|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]黄 伟,赵立文.清代宋学、汉学之争的实质及其影响[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2010,12(03):67-71.
　HUANG Wei,ZHAO Li-wen.Essence of the dispute between Han school and Song school in Qing Dynasty and its influence[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2010,12(03):67-71.
点击复制

清代宋学、汉学之争的实质及其影响(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第12卷
期数:
2010年03期
页码:
67-71
栏目:
历史学
出版日期:
2010-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Essence of the dispute between Han school and Song school in Qing Dynasty and its influence
作者:
黄 伟1; 赵立文2
1. 南开大学 哲学院,天津 300071; 2. 河北大学 文学院,河北 保定 071002
Author(s):
HUANG Wei1;  ZHAO Li-wen2
1. School of Philosophy, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; 2. School of Literature, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China
关键词:
清代;  宋学;  汉学;  儒学道统
Keywords:
Qing Dynasty;  Song school;  Han school;  Confucian orthodoxy
分类号:
K249.105
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从道统的角度审视清代宋学、汉学之争的实质和影响。分析认为,清代宋学和汉学之争的实质是儒学和皇权的道统之争:顺治、康熙等以宋学的名义逐渐从儒学士人手中夺取儒学道统,清代宋学在皇权面前集体失语; 然而,儒学士人的道统情怀及其惯性使得清代汉学家另辟蹊径,尝试建构新学统,以重获对儒学圣道和经典解释的话语权,重塑儒学新道统; 只是清代汉学家狭隘的学术视野、怀疑作风和排斥思想的方法不仅未能完成重塑道统的使命,还从内部瓦解了儒学价值及其载体; 在欧美文化的强势冲击下,儒学变得日益支离破碎,加剧了近代中国思想的贫困。
Abstract:
The review of the dispute between Han school and Song school in Qing Dynasty from the traditional angle can fully reveal its essence and influence. The analysis shows that the essence of the dispute between them is actually the one between the Confucianism and the authority. Shunzhi and Kangxi, after taking the name of Song school, gradually transform Confucians to the Confucian orthodoxy so that Song school in Qing Dynasty lost their chances to speak. In this case, a lot of Confucians of Han school had to look for new approach and open up new learning so that they could have their position before the authority and their new orthodoxy. However, their narrow scope in learning and the way of repelling anything and distrusting anybody resulted in the failure of their expectation and also the breakdown of themselves. With the great impact of European and American cultures, they were disintegrated step by step and became weaker in the contemporary idealogy.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘师培.清儒得失论:刘师培论学杂稿[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[2]徐复观.两汉思想史[M].台北:学生书局,1979.
[3]钱 穆.中国学术思想史论丛[M].台北:东大图书公司,1980.
[4]朱维铮.清学史:汉学与反汉学一页[J].复旦大学学报:社会科学版,1993,59(5):23-26.
[5]梁启超.中国近三百年学术史[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[6]徐世昌.清儒学案[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[7]朱维铮,江 藩,方东树.汉学师承记:外二种[M].北京:三联书店,1998.
[8]王德昭.清代科举制度研究[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[9]陆德阳.道统学说的创建和重建:韩愈和荻生徂徕比较之三[J].华东师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2001,33(3):57-63,127.
[10]姜 鹏.北宋经筵中的师道实践[J].学术研究,2009,52(7):114-121.
[11]徐复观.中国思想史论集[M].台北:学生书局,1993.
[12]梁启超.清代学术概论[M].北京:东方出版社,1996.

相似文献/References:

[1]车冬梅.清代“汉宋之争”的政治因素与学术态势[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2012,14(04):112.
　CHE Dong-mei.Political factors and academic trend in “Contention between Han and Song” in Qing Dynasty[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2012,14(03):112.
[2]赵红军,章韬,萧凌波.气候冲击、海外白银输入与社会动乱——来自清代华北平原的经验证据[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(05):72.
　ZHAO Hongjun,ZHANG Tao,XIAO Lingbo.Climate shock, overseas silver inflow and social revolt——empirical evidences from the North China Plain in the Qing dynasty[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(03):72.
[3]熊昌锟.清代民间舆论对洋银流通的认知与因应[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(05):87.
　XIONG Changkun.Public’s cognition and response on the inflow of foreign silver dollars in Qing dynasty[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(03):87.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2010-03-18 作者简介:黄 伟(1978-),男,河北保定人,哲学博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2010-09-20