|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]熊昌锟.清代民间舆论对洋银流通的认知与因应[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(05):87-96.
 XIONG Changkun.Public’s cognition and response on the inflow of foreign silver dollars in Qing dynasty[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(05):87-96.
点击复制

清代民间舆论对洋银流通的认知与因应(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
87-96
栏目:
历史学
出版日期:
2018-11-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Public’s cognition and response on the inflow of foreign silver dollars in Qing dynasty
文章编号:
1671-6248(2018)05-0087-10
作者:
熊昌锟
中国社会科学院 经济研究所,北京100836
Author(s):
XIONG Changkun
Institute of Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100836,China
关键词:
清代洋银自铸银元改革币制整顿圜法
Keywords:
Qing dynasty foreign silver dollarmonetary reform monetary reform regulation reorganize monetary
分类号:
F822.9
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
明末清初,外国机制标准化的银元开始大量进入东南沿海商埠,逐渐成为对外贸易的结算货币,内陆及边疆地区亦行用日广。对社会各界的关注重点进行文献梳理和分析总结,发现当时民间舆论对洋银流入的认知和应因大致可分为3个层面,首先是从流通传播层面介绍洋银的形制及其在不同区域的使用情形,其次从认知接受层面展现时人对洋银流通的看法,最后是从应对行动层面来看洋银流通引发的问题、各省自铸银元的实践和清廷币制改革的过程。舆论对洋银流入的种种反应,呈现出社会层面对外来货币的认知逐步加深,并提出仿铸以取而代之,实现货币主权的迫切希望。总体来看,随着对洋银流入这一货币现象认识的加深,舆论的焦点也从通货本身逐渐延伸到货币制度改革的讨论。事实上,舆论的高涨对清廷中央和地方政府出台应对举措起到了重要的影响,因为从清季政府行动层面来看,几乎都围绕着禁止或仿铸之争、自铸银元、改革币制而展开。
Abstract:
In the late Ming and early Qing dynasty, large amounts of foreign machinemade standardized silver dollars began to enter commercial ports along China’s southeast coast, and gradually became widely used settlement currencies in foreign trades, and later the usage and circulation of which gradually expanded to the northern and inland boarder areas. This paper researched and analyzed the public attention and reaction to the inflow of silver dollars at that time and found that public resignation and response can be summarized in three levels: firstly in terms of circulation, it introduced the shape and casting of foreign silver dollars and usage; secondly in terms of recognition and acceptation, it demonstrated people’s view on circulation of these silver dollars; thirdly in terms of response and reactions, it discussed the problems caused by these circulating silver dollars and the practice of some provinces casting their own silver dollars and the currency reform in Qing dynasty. The opinions and reactions of the public to the inflow of foreign silver dollars reflected the deepening of understanding to foreign currencies as well as the urge to get hold of monetary sovereignty by replicating foreign casting methods. Overall, along with the deepening of understanding on inflow of foreign dollars, the public shifted from focus on inflation to discussion on currency reforms. In fact, the escalating public attention did have important impact on the central and local governments in Qing dynasty since the governments’ action mostly revolved around banning the competition on replicating dollars, selfcasting dollars and monetary reforms.

参考文献/References:

[1]郑光祖.一斑录[M].北京:中国书店,1990.

[2]诸畮香.明斋小识[O].上海进步书局印行本.
[ 3]薛福成.薛福成日记稿本[O].光绪五年八月廿二日影印本,1879.
[4]何乔远.闽书[O].四库全书本.
[5]张燮.东西洋考[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[6]何乔远.镜山全集[M].张家庄,陈节,点校.福建省文史研究馆,整理.福州:福建人民出版社,2015.
[7]顾炎武.天下郡国利病书[M].黄坤,校点.上海:上海古籍出版社,2012.
[8]屈大均.广东新语[M].北京:中华书局,2010.
[9]《清代诗文集汇编》编纂委员会编.清代诗文集汇编:309[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[10]慕天颜.请开海禁疏[C]//贺长龄.皇朝经世文编:26[M].上海宏文阁铅印本,1898.
[11]沈复.浮生六记[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2000.
[12]邓淳.岭南丛述[O].道光庚寅本,1830.
[13]梁绍壬.两般秋雨盦随笔[M].上海文明书局印行本,1923.
[14]周腾虎.铸银钱说[C]//盛康.皇朝经世文续编:卷58.光绪二十三年思补楼刊行本,1897.
[15]佚名.洋钱考[J].中国教会新报,1871(163):910.
[16]邹弢.三借庐笔谈[O].上海进步书局印行本,1934.
[17]盛大士.泉史[O].道光十四年本,1834.
[18]苏富源.新增银论[O].同治十三年广东省城刊本,1874.
[19]魏源.海国图志[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2004.
[20]徐继畲.瀛寰志略[M].北京:文物出版社,2007.
[21]王庆云.石渠余记[M].北京:北京古籍出版社,1983.
[22]汪辉祖.病榻梦痕录[O].续修四库全书本.
[23]许瑶光.谈浙[O].光绪十四年刻本,1888.
[24]包世臣.安吴四种[M].台北:文海出版社,1968.
[25]汤震.危言[C]//郑观应,汤震,邵作舟.危言三种. 邹振环,整理.上海:上海古籍出版社, 2013:253-416.
[26]林则徐.林文忠公政书[O].光绪二年福州林氏刊本,1876.
[27]佚名.论通商之益[C]//邵之棠.皇朝经世文统编:卷47.光绪辛丑年上海宝善齐石印本,1901.
[28]佚名.中国整顿商务策[C]//陈忠倚.皇朝经世文三编:卷32.光绪壬寅年上海书局印本,1902.
[29]佚名.自造银币利弊论[N].申报,1890-12-14(1).
[30]郑观应.盛世危言[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.
[31]佚名.中国急宜收回利权说[C]//邵之棠.皇朝经世文统编:卷106.光绪辛丑年上海宝善齐石印本,1901.
[32]汤成烈.治赋篇六[C]//盛康.皇朝经世文续编:卷34.光绪二十三年思补楼刊行本,1897.
[33]魏源.钱漕更弊议[C]//盛康.皇朝经世文续编:卷36.光绪二十三年思补楼刊行本,1897.
[34]郭嵩焘.致李鸿章:光绪三年三月[C]//梁小进.郭嵩焘全集:13.长沙:岳麓书社,2012:271277.
[35]中国第一历史档案馆编.嘉庆朝上谕档[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2008.
[36]丁履恒.钱币议[C]//盛康.皇朝经世文续编:卷58.光绪二十三年思补楼刊行本,1897.
[37]中国人民银行总行参事室金融史料组.中国近代货币史资料:第一辑清政府统治时期(1840~1911)[M].北京:中华书局,1964.
[38]佚名.论东洋新铸大小银钱铜钱事[N].申报,1872-02-26(1).
[39]佚名.论自铸银钱之便[N].申报,1876-11-07(1).
[40]佚名.中国富强策[C]//何良栋.皇朝经世文四编:卷2.光绪壬寅年上海书局石印本,1902.
[41]佚名.论鼓铸银圆诚为便民之举[N].申报,1895-11-19(1).
[42]陈炽.铸银条陈[C]//麦仲华.皇朝经世文新编:卷11.光绪辛丑年上海日新社石印本,1901.
[43]佚名.推广龙圆说[C]//何良栋.皇朝经世文四编:卷21.光绪壬寅年上海书局石印本,1902.
[44]佚名.自造银币利弊论[C]//何良栋.皇朝经世文四编:卷21.光绪壬寅年上海书局石印本,1902.
[45]佚名.通商论[C]//何良栋.皇朝经世文四编:卷23.光绪壬寅年上海书局石印本,1902.
[46]朱云表.商务议[C]//求是斋.皇朝经世文编五集:卷18.光绪壬寅年上海宜今室石印本,1902.
[47]佚名.论银贱钱贵之可骇异[C]//甘韩,杨凤藻.皇朝经世文新编续集:卷11.光绪壬寅年商绛雪斋书局本,1902.
[48]沈毓桂.铸银币得失说[C]//南开大学古籍与文化研究所编.清文海:80.北京:国家图书馆出版社, 2010:451-456.
[49]佚名.通行银元八议[C]//陈忠倚.皇朝经世文三编:卷33.光绪壬寅年上海书局印本,1902.
[50]林则徐.江苏奏稿[C]//林文忠公政书,上海:商务印书馆影印本,出版年不详:13-96.
[51]冯桂芬.校邠庐抗议[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2002.
[52]康祖诒.上皇帝书第二[C]//陈忠倚.皇朝经世文三编:卷16.光绪壬寅年上海书局印本,1902.
[53]佚名.论中国亟宜整顿圜法[N].申报,1897-11-09(1).
[54]汪康年.论今日当以知懼知耻为本[C]//陈忠倚.皇朝经世文三编:卷13.光绪壬寅年上海书局印本,1902.
[55]叶昌炽.缘督庐日记[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,2002.
[56]孟森.上度支部论铸银币书[J].东方杂志,1908,5(3):1-8. [57]王瑬.钱币刍言[O].道光十七年本,1837.
[58]佚名.行钞法以补制钱之缺论[C]//何良栋.皇朝经世文四编:卷22.光绪壬寅年上海书局石印本,1902.
[59]佚名.论行钞票以济钱之不足[C]//何良栋.皇朝经世文四编:卷22.光绪壬寅年上海书局石印本,1902.
[60]佚名.纵论时事[C]//邵之棠.皇朝经世文统编:卷102.光绪辛丑年上海宝善齐石印本,1901.
[61]佚名.铸造银元重一两与七钱二分之解决[J].广益丛报,1908(167):1-2.
[62]中国第一历史档案馆编.宣统朝上谕档[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2008. [63]蓝鼎元.鹿洲初集[M].台北:文海出版社, 1977.

相似文献/References:

[1]车冬梅.清代“汉宋之争”的政治因素与学术态势[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2012,14(04):112.
 CHE Dong-mei.Political factors and academic trend in “Contention between Han and Song” in Qing Dynasty[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2012,14(05):112.
[2]黄 伟,赵立文.清代宋学、汉学之争的实质及其影响[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2010,12(03):67.
 HUANG Wei,ZHAO Li-wen.Essence of the dispute between Han school and Song school in Qing Dynasty and its influence[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2010,12(05):67.
[3]赵红军,章韬,萧凌波.气候冲击、海外白银输入与社会动乱——来自清代华北平原的经验证据[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(05):72.
 ZHAO Hongjun,ZHANG Tao,XIAO Lingbo.Climate shock, overseas silver inflow and social revolt——empirical evidences from the North China Plain in the Qing dynasty[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(05):72.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家社会科学基金项目(17CZS028)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-15