|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]高海青.重释马尔库塞单向度理论的逻辑[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2011,13(03):67-72.
　GAO Hai-qing.Reexplanation for the logic of Marcuse's theory of one-dimension[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2011,13(03):67-72.
点击复制

重释马尔库塞单向度理论的逻辑(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第13卷
期数:
2011年03期
页码:
67-72
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2011-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reexplanation for the logic of Marcuse's theory of one-dimension
作者:
高海青
中共中央党校 研究生院,北京 100091
Author(s):
GAO Hai-qing
School of Graduate, Party School of the Central Committee of C.P.C., Beijing 100091, China
关键词:
马尔库塞;  法兰克福学派;  单向度;  技术理性
Keywords:
Marcuse;  Frankfurt school of thought;  one-dimension;  technical rationality
分类号:
B512.5
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
重释马尔库塞的单向度理论具有深刻的现实意义,从历史的、整体的视角审视从形式合理性批判到技术理性批判再到艺术审美的演变逻辑,发现马尔库塞的单向度理论不仅是对各种理论的整合,而且更是对马克思主义和韦伯主义两大理论体系的综合。单向度理论通过对技术理性的深刻批判揭示了发达工业社会的压抑性,马尔库塞最终走向浪漫和悲观的艺术审美解放路线,但是无法真正实现人类解放的路线。
Abstract:
Through reexplanation for the logic of Marcuse's theory of one-dimension, the author intends to survey the evolutive logic from the critique of formal rationality to the critique of technical rationality and then to esthetics from the historical and holistic perspectives. The research finds that the theory of one-dimension is a type of integration of several theories and also a type of integration of theoretical systems of Marxism and Weberism. The theory of one-dimension opens the oppression of developed industry society through profoundly criticizing the technical rationality. However, Marcuse finally tends towards the liberation strategy of romantic and pessimistic esthetics which can not really and truly realize the social liberation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思以后的马克思主义[M].余其铨,赵常林,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1986.
[2]M·洛威,张伯霖.法兰克福学派:理性的马克思主义[J].哲学译丛,1984,56(2):23-31.
[3]Marx W.Economy and society[M].Pasadena:Press of California University,1978.
[4]马尔库塞.现代文明与人的困境:马尔库塞文集[M].李小兵,译.上海:上海三联书店,1989.
[5]Martin J.The dialectical imagination[M].Pasadena:Press of California University,1996.
[6]傅永军.马尔库塞“发达工业社会批判理论”评析[J].山东大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1999,61(1):69-73.
[7]Andrew F.Heidegger and Marcuse:the catastrophe and redemption of history [M].New York:Routledge Press,2005.
[8]Andrew Feenberg.Questioning technology[M].New York: Routledge Press,2005.
[9]马尔库塞.单向度的人:发达工业社会意识形态研究[M].张 峰,吕世平,译.重庆:重庆出版社,1988.
[10]凯尔勒.马尔库塞的遗产[J].北京科技大学学报:社会科学版,1999,25(1):14-17.
[11]Andrew F.Marxism and the critique of social rationality:from surplus value to the politics of technology[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,2009,24(3):10-16.
[12]马尔库塞.审美之维[M].李小兵,译.北京:三联书店,1989.
[13]马尔库塞.工业社会和新左派[M].任 立,译.北京:商务印书馆,1982.
[14]马尔库塞.现代美学析疑[M].绿 原,译.北京:文化艺术出版社,1987.

相似文献/References:

[1]张晓立.美国当代流行文化批判[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(04):74.
　ZHANG Xiao-li.Critical review of modern American popular culture[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(03):74.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2011-06-01 作者简介:高海青(1983-),男,山东滨州人,哲学博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-09-20