|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张 典.海德格尔对尼采永恒复返思想的解读[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2011,13(03):62-66.
 ZHANG Dian.Heidegger's explanation on Nietzsche's the eternal recurrence of the same[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2011,13(03):62-66.
点击复制

海德格尔对尼采永恒复返思想的解读(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第13卷
期数:
2011年03期
页码:
62-66
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2011-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Heidegger's explanation on Nietzsche's the eternal recurrence of the same
作者:
张 典12
1. 苏州科技学院 人文学院,江苏 苏州 215009; 2. 复旦大学 哲学学院,上海 200433
Author(s):
ZHANG Dian12
1. School of Humanities,Suzhou College of Science & Technology,Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China; 2. School of Philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
关键词:
尼采 海德格尔 柏拉图 永恒复返思想
Keywords:
Nietzsche Heidegger Plato the eternal recurrence of the same
分类号:
B516.47
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从尼采的谱系学角度分析海德格尔解读尼采永恒复返学说存在的局限性,具体分析尼采与西方形而上学传统的复杂关系。分析认为,海德格尔批判尼采缺少了德国乡土的向度,实际上这个向度相对化了; 海德格尔看重形而上学问题,并依此批判尼采的缺失,而尼采哲学的根本问题不在此; 尼采对于理解欧洲虚无主义问题具有重要性。
Abstract:
This paper analyzes the existing limitations for Heidegger's explanation on Nietzsche's eternal recurrence of the same from Nietzsche's genealogy, mainly for the complex relationship between Nietzsche and westerner's metaphysics. The analysis shows that when Heidegger criticized Hietzsche. He lacked the Germany rural dimension and this dimension is too relative. Heidegger stressed metaphysics so as to believe the lack of it in Nietzsche's, and actually the main problem of Nietzsche was not there, but of great significance to the understanding of the European nihilism.

参考文献/References:

[1] 尼采.看哪这人:尼采自述[M].张念东,凌素心,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2005.
[2]尼采.快乐的知识[M].黄明嘉,译.北京:中央编译出版社,1999.
[3]尼采.权力意志:重估一切价值的尝试[M].张念东,凌素心,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2000.
[4]海德格尔.尼采[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002.
[5] Friedrich N.Selected letters of Friedrich Nietzsche [M].Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1969.

相似文献/References:

[1]原 雪.尼采哲学中酒神精神的美学阐释[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2009,11(01):107.
 YUAN Xue.Aesthetic review on Nietzsche's dionysian spirit[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2009,11(03):107.
[2]李晓侠.论劳伦斯小说艺术创作观念的思想渊源[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(04):46.
 LI Xiao-xia.Discussion on the ideological sources of Lawrences novels[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):46.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2011-04-25 基金项目:中国博士后第三批特别资助项目(201003252) 作者简介:张 典(1970-),男,湖北天门人,苏州科技学院副教授,复旦大学博士后。
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-09-20