|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]袁新岭,徐海成,卫俊良.非封闭式收费公路逃费的博弈分析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2008,10(01):35-37.
 YUAN Xin-ling,XU Hai-cheng,WEI Jun-liang.Game analysis for dodging toll on unclosed toll road[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2008,10(01):35-37.
点击复制

非封闭式收费公路逃费的博弈分析(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第10卷
期数:
2008年01期
页码:
35-37
栏目:
交通运输经济与管理
出版日期:
2008-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Game analysis for dodging toll on unclosed toll road
作者:
袁新岭徐海成卫俊良
长安大学 经济与管理学院,陕西 西安 710064
Author(s):
YUAN Xin-ling XU Hai-cheng WEI Jun-liang
School of Economics and Management, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
交通运输管理 非封闭式收费公路 收费标准 逃费
Keywords:
transportation management unclosed toll road toll standard dodging toll
分类号:
F540
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为揭示非封闭式收费公路逃费的本质原因,规避逃费行为,运用博弈理论和期望矩阵模型对逃费现象进行分析。分析认为:在现有约束条件下,逃费者和参与逃费的村民、管理者在相互博弈中共谋逃费是其利益的最优选择。分析结果表明,治理逃费的根本途径在于降低公路收费标准,深化监管体制改革,科学布局公路收费站点。
Abstract:
Dodging toll on unclosed road is very difficult to control. It has seriously damaged the interests of investors and the development of China's road transport. To reveal the reasons for dodging and avoid it, this paper analyzes the phenomena of dodging the toll through game theory and game expectation matrix. The authors believe that in the current restrictions, dodging toll is the optimal selection in mutual game among the users, the villagers and managers.Therefore, the authors believe that reducing the toll standard, reforming the supervising and management system and setting up toll booth reasonably are the basic ways to solve this problem.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周国光.利用非国有资本加快高速公路建设的理论探索[J].长安大学学报:社会科学版,2007,9(1):1-5.
[2] 张丽娟,唐文峻.高速公路计重收费货车逃费现象分析及对策[J].青海交通科技,2005,18(5):24-26.
[3] 郭晓泽.逃费车辆作弊的几种类型以及防范和应对建议[J].交通财会,2006,21(9):46-47.
[4] 于信举.机动车偷逃交通规费的原因与控制对策[J].黑河科技,2002,24(4):53-54.
[5] 谢识予.经济博弈论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1997.
[6] 李丽青,师 萍.企业中介机构串谋财务舞弊的博弈模型与实证分析[J].长安大学学报:社会科学版,2004,6(4):29-32.
[7] 刘 儒,周丽涛.机动车超载行为的博弈分析及治理措施[J].长安大学学报:社会科学版,2005,7(3):9-19.
[8] 张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
[9] 潘雷驰.中国税收征管方式的博弈分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2006,26(1):24-28.
[10] 陶 虎.证券监管者寻租行为的博弈分析[J].山东经济,2006,23(1):71-73.

相似文献/References:

[1]周 伟.燃油税费改革对交通运输业发展的影响与机遇[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2009,11(01):1.
 ZHOU Wei.Reform of fuel tariff rate on traffic industry development[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2009,11(01):1.
[2]董 治,李林波,王艳丽.城市交通管理公众参与机制的要素[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2009,11(01):38.
 DONG Zhi,LI Lin-bo,WANG Yan-li.Elements in public participation mechanism of urban traffic management[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2009,11(01):38.
[3]孙传姣,周 伟,王元庆,等.基于网络分析法的快速公交系统方案选择[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2008,10(01):25.
 SUN Chuan-jiao,ZHOU Wei,WANG Yuan-qing,et al.Alternatives for bus rapid transit from analytic network process[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2008,10(01):25.
[4]郗恩崇,王家明.城市综合公共交通系统的构建[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2008,10(02):1.
 XI En-chong,WANG Jia-ming.Establishment for integrated transit system[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2008,10(01):1.
[5]霍忠义,李宏伟,韩东方.博弈理论在道路运输行政处罚中的应用[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2008,10(02):120.
 HUO Zhong-yi,LI Hong-wei,HAN Dong-fang.Application of game theory for administrative punishment in road transportation[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2008,10(01):120.
[6]雷孟林.卡普的经营性质[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2008,10(03):83.
 LEI Meng-lin.Analysis on profitability of carpool[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2008,10(01):83.
[7]雷孟林.论免费公交车运输行为的性质[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(04):30.
 LEI Meng-lin.Behavior characteristics of free public transportation[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(01):30.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2007-09-18 作者简介:袁新岭(1979-),男,河南夏邑人,工学博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2008-03-20