|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周辉宇,张晨燕,李红昌.基于出行者选择的城市公交和共享单车竞合关系影响因素研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2020,22(02):48-61.
　ZHOU Huiyu,ZHANG Chenyan,LI Hongchang.Influencing factors on the coopetition relationship between public bus and bike sharing based on traveler’s choice[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2020,22(02):48-61.
点击复制

基于出行者选择的城市公交和共享单车竞合关系影响因素研究()
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第22卷
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
48-61
栏目:
交通运输
出版日期:
2020-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influencing factors on the coopetition relationship between public bus and bike sharing based on traveler’s choice
文章编号:
1671-6248(2020)02-0048-14
作者:
周辉宇; 张晨燕; 李红昌
 （北京交通大学 经济管理学院，北京100044）
Author(s):
ZHOU Huiyu; ZHANG Chenyan;  LI Hongchang
(School of Economics and Management,Beijng Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)
关键词:
城市公交; 共享单车; MNL模型; 可持续发展; 通勤效率; 北京
Keywords:
public bus; shared bike; MNL model; sustainable development; commuting efficiency; Beijing
分类号:
F572
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 

 摘要：为了更好地便利交通并促进城市地面交通系统可持续发展，基于出行者行为选择，从竞合关系视角研究共享单车对公交的影响，以共享单车对公交影响的相关文献为案例进行研究，包括北美、欧洲、大洋洲和亚洲的城市，并总结归纳相关影响因素；对北京市出行者进行了SP问卷调查，利用MNL模型定量分析了各种因素对出行者公交、共享单车选择的影响，采用二元logit模型估计组合模式选择的影响机制。研究认为，共享单车作为独立个体或接驳公共交通的新模式，与地面公交交通模式间竞争与合作并存，可骑行距离、道路基础设施以及出行者的心理因素都会导致共享单车和公交之间的竞争；相反，公交换乘站之间的距离、出行端点与站点的间距均会影响二者的合作模式。城市交通管理者应合理配置公交和共享单车的数量，鼓励市区出行者根据自己的需求选择不同的出行模式以快速接驳轨道交通，提倡竞争性并行，促进公交和共享单车在综合交通系统中的合作与协调发展。

Abstract:
In order to better facilitate transports and promote the sustainable development of the entire urban transport system on the ground, this paper mainly aims at studying the impact of shared bikes on the public bus based on the traveler’s behavior choice from both competitive and cooperative perspectives. First, this paper studies the related literature on the influence of shared bikes on the public bus, including in cities in North America, Europe, Oceania, and Asia,and summarizes the relevant influencing factors. Second, an SP questionnaire survey has been conducted on travelers in Beijing and the MNL model is adopted to quantitatively analyze the effect of various factors on travelers’ modal choices between bus and shared bikes, and the binary logit model is adopted to estimate the influence mechanism on their choice of combination. The results of this study show that there is coopetition between the ground transport mode of public bus and the shared bikes, which are a new mode on its own or a mode interfacing with the public transport. The distance that can be covered by bike, the road infrastructure, and the travelers’ psychological factors all suggest a competition between the public bus and shared bikes. On the other hand, the distance between bus transfer stations, and the distance between starting point or destination and the bus station will also influence the mode of cooperation between the two choices. The urban transport administrators should allocate a reasonable number of public buses and shared bikes, encourage downtown travelers to choose different modes of traveling based on their needs in order to quickly connect with the rail transit, advocate the competition among different modes of transport, and promote the cooperation and coordinated development of public bus and shared bikes in the integrated transport system.Key words:

参考文献/References:

 ［1］Shaheen S A.Mobility and the sharing economy［J］. Transport Policy, 2016, 51:141142.
［2］Greg G, Ipek S.Planning for bike share connectivity to rail transit［J］. Journal of Public Transportation, 2016, 19(2):1-22.
［3］ElAssi W,Mahmoud M S,Habib K N.Effects of built environment and weather on bike sharing demand: a station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto［J］. Transportation, 2017, 44(3):589-613.
［4］Hu L,Schneider R J.Shifts between automobile, bus, and bicycle commuting in an urban setting ［J］.Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 2014, 141(2):1-16.
［5］Jppinen S, Toivonen T, Salonen M.Modelling the potential effect of shared bicycles on public transport travel times in Greater Helsinki: an open data approach ［J］. Applied Geography, 2013, 43:13-24.
［6］Nikitas A.Understanding bike sharing acceptability and expected usage patterns in the context of a small city novel to the concept: a story of "Greek Drama"［J］.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2018, 56:306-321.
［7］Martin E W, Shaheen S A.Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: a tale of two U.S. cities［J］.Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 41:315-324.
［8］Campbell K B,Brakewood C.Sharing riders: how bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City ［J］.Policy and Practice, 2017,100:264-282
［9］Sun Y,Mobasheri A,Hu X, et al.Investigating impacts of environmental factors on the cycling behaviour of bicyclesharing users［J］.Sustainability,2017,9(6):1060.
［10］Riggs W. Painting the fence: social norms as economic incentives to nonautomotive travel behaviour［J］. Travel Behaviour & Society, 2017, 7:26-33.
［11］Chang A, MirandaMoreno L, Cao J, et al. The effect of BRT implementation and streetscape redesign on physical activity:a case study of Mexico City［J］.Transportation Research Part A Policy & Practice,2017,100:337-347.
［12］BachandMarleau J, Lee B H Y, ElGeneidy A M.Better understanding of factors influencing likelihood of using shared bicycle systems and frequency of use［J］. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012, 2314:66-71.
［13］Vedel S E, Jacobsen J B, SkovPetersen H.Bicyclists’ preferences for route characteristics and crowding in Copenhagen—a choice experiment study of commuters［J］. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 100:53-64.
［14］Haustein S, Thorhauge M, Cherchi E. Commuters’ attitudes and norms related to travel time and punctuality:a psychographic segmentation to reduce congestion［J］. Travel Behaviour & Society, 2018, 12:41-50.
［15］Brjesson M, Fung C M, Proost S, et al. Do buses hinder cyclists or is it the other way around?optimal bus fares, bus stops and cycling tolls ［J］.Transportation Research Part A Policy & Practice, 2018,111:326-346.
［16］Bejarano M, Ceballos L M, Maya J.A usercentred assessment of a new bicycle sharing system in Medellin ［J］. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 2017, 44:145-158.
［17］Ye R, Titheridge H.Satisfaction with the commute: The role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes［EB/OL］.(2016-06-11)［2019-10-08］. http://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=3e777e26ee3b02df7ccdf384ba5119fa&site=xueshu_se.
［18］Zhu J, Fan Y.Commute happiness in Xi’an, China:effects of commute mode, duration, and frequency［J］. Travel Behaviour & Society, 2018, 11:43-51.
［19］Nair R,MillerHooks E,Hampshire R C,et al. Largescale vehicle sharing systems: analysis of vélib’［J］. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2013, 7(1):85-106.
［20］Saberi M, Ghamami M,Gu Y,et al.Understanding the impacts of a public transit disruption on bicycle sharing mobility patterns:a case of tube strike in London ［J］. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018, 66:154-166.
［21］Pucher J,Buehler R.Integrating bicycling and public transport in North America［J］.Journal of Public Transportation, 2009, 12(3)：79-104.
［22］BachandMarleau J, Larsen J, ElGeneidy A M.Muchanticipated marriage of cycling and transit how will it work?［J］. Transportation Research Record ：Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011（1）:109-117.
［23］Martens K. The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries［J］. Transportation Research Part D： Transport & Environment,2004,9(4):281-294.
［24］Yang X H,Cheng Z,Chen G, et al.The impact of a public bicyclesharing system on urban public transport networks［J］.Transportation Research Part A： Policy & Practice, 2018, 107：246-256.
［25］Yang L,Li C,Wang Y.Bikeandride behaviour study in economic and technological development zone in Xi’an［J］.Procedia  Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2014, 138:168-173.
［26］Lotan T.Effects of familiarity on route choice behavior in the presence of information［J］.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 1997, 5(3/4):225-243.
［27］Watkins K E,Ferris B,Borning A, et al.Where is my bus? impact of mobile realtime information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders［J］. Transportation Research Part A, 2011, 45(8):840-848.
［28］Tang Y,Pan H,Fei Y.Research on users’ frequency of ride in Shanghai Minhang bikesharing system［J］.Transportation Research Procedia, 2017, 25:4983-4991.
［29］艾瑞咨询.2017年中国共享单车行业研究报告［EB/OL］.(2017-03-23) ［2019-03-09］. http://www.199it.com/archives/574440.html?source=1.
［30］Kahn M E. Areview of travel by design: the influence of urban form on travel［J］.Regional Science & Urban Economics, 2004, 32(2):275-277.
［31］Munshi T.Built environment and mode choice relationship for commute travel in the city of Rajkot, India［J］.Transportation Research Part D：Transport & Environment, 2016, 44:239-253.
［32］Keijer M J N, Rietveld P.How do people get to the railway station? the Dutch experience［J］.Transportation Planning and Technology, 2000,23:215-235.

相似文献/References:

[1]周建高. 共享单车爆棚与中国城市空间结构问题[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):20.
　ZHOU Jian-gao.The boom of sharing bicycles and Chinese urban spatial structure[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):20.
[2]王光荣.共享单车发展问题系统探究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):30.
　Wang Guang-rong. Systematic research on Bicycle-sharing development[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):30.
[3]丁诺舟. 日本共享单车的历史、现状与启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):36.
　Ding Nuozhou. History, current situation and enlightenment of Japanese bicycle-sharing[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):36.
[4]欧国立,王冬雪.共享单车经济属性及其发展探析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(04):25.
　OU Guo-li,WANG Dong-xue.Research on economic attributes and development of bicycle sharing[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):25.
[5]王小芳,张文秀.共享单车行业发展的若干问题探析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(04):31.
　WANG Xiao-fang,ZHANG Wen-xiu.Analysis on some problems in the development of shared bicycle industry[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):31.
[6]卢文捷.共享单车运营立法规制管窥[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(04):39.
　LU Wen-jie.Restriction of legislative regulation of the operation of bicycle sharing[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):39.
[7]黄文成,帅斌.中小城市公交运营现状调研方法及结果分析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(06):26.
　HUANG Wen-cheng,SHUAI Bin.Research methods and results analysis on the current situation of 〖JP〗public transport in small and mediumsized cities[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):26.
[8]张新文,戴芬园.共享单车的外部性及其治理[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(02):22.
　ZHANG Xin-wen,DAI Fen-yuan.Externalities of sharing bicycles and their governance[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(02):22.
[9]夏芸,玉琦彤,林子立.共享单车需求评估及调度方案设计[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(02):32.
　XIA Yun,YU Qi-tong,LIN Zi-li.Needs assessment and scheduling scheme of shared bicycles[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(02):32.
[10]洪萍,张霞娅,余帅栋.共享单车押金管理问题与对策[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(05):24.
　HONG Ping,ZHANG Xiaya,YU Shuaidong.Problem and solution on the management of deposits for shared bicycle[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(02):24.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

基金项目：中央高校专项资金资助项目（2019JBW008）作者简介：周辉宇（1985-），男，湖南岳阳人，副教授，硕士研究生导师，工学博士。



更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-25