|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周念利,吴希贤,焦婕.基于DEPA探究亚太地区数字贸易治理前景[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2022,(02):14-21.
 ZHOU Nianli,WU Xixian,JIAO Jie.Exploring the prospects of digital trade governance in the Asia-Pacific region based on DEPA[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2022,(02):14-21.
点击复制

基于DEPA探究亚太地区数字贸易治理前景(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
14-21
栏目:
国际经济与贸易
出版日期:
2022-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Exploring the prospects of digital trade governance in the Asia-Pacific region based on DEPA
文章编号:
1671-6248(2022)02-0014-08
作者:
周念利1吴希贤12焦婕1
(1. 对外经济贸易大学 中国世界贸易组织研究院,北京 100029; 2. 对外经济贸易大学 北京对外开放研究院,北京 100029)
Author(s):
ZHOU Nianli1 WU Xixian12 JIAO Jie1
(1. China Institute for WTO Studies, University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029, China; 2. Beijing Open Economy Research Institute, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)
关键词:
数字贸易治理 《数字经济伙伴关系协定》 中美博弈 亚太地区 《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》 《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》 中小经济体
Keywords:
digital trade governance Digital Economy Partnership Agreement(DEPA) Sino-US game Asia-Pacific region Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP) Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership(CPTPP) small and medium-sized economy
分类号:
F744; F49
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
随着全球数字贸易的迅猛发展,当前WTO多边框架下数字贸易规则存在缺失,使得数字贸易治理呈现出区域化趋势。为探究亚太地区数字贸易治理前景,预判亚太经济体参与数字贸易治理的可能路径,基于《数字经济伙伴关系协定》(DEPA),采用文献分析、规则文本对比、逻辑推演等研究方法,对亚太地区数字贸易治理的议题广度和深度、谈判模式、模块特征、关注焦点及竞争格局进行全面系统的分析研判。研究认为,未来亚太数字贸易治理主要呈现以下趋向:数字贸易治理将涵盖更多新兴技术领域,传统议题也会趋于更高标准; 专门协定的高效率将驱使数字贸易议题逐渐与传统议题相剥离,协定的框架形式也将采取开放、灵活、包容的“主题模块”形式。数字包容性发展、数字便利化等议题将是亚太数字贸易治理的焦点议题; 亚太数字贸易治理的大国博弈将以中美两国为中心,中小经济体也会以“联合抱团”来争取某些议题的话语权。
Abstract:
With the rapid development of global digital trade and the lack of digital trade rules under the WTO multilateral framework, digital trade governance has shown a regionalization trend. In order to explore the prospects of digital trade governance in the Asia-Pacific region and predict the possible paths for Asia-Pacific economies to participate in digital trade governance, based on the Digital Economy Partnership Agreement(DEPA), this paper uses the research methods such as literature analysis, rule-text comparison, and logical deduction to conduct a comprehensive and systematic analysis and judgment on the breadth and depth of issues, negotiation modes, module characteristics, focus of attention and competition landscape of digital trade governance in the Asia-Pacific region. The research believes that the future Asia-Pacific digital trade governance will mainly show the following trends. Digital trade governance will cover more emerging technology fields, while traditional issues will tend to require a higher standard. The high efficiency of the special agreement will drive the digital trade issue to be gradually separated from the traditional issue, and the framework form of the agreement will also adopt an open, flexible and inclusive thematic module. In addition, issues such as digital inclusive development and digital facilitation will be the focus of Asia-Pacific digital trade governance. The big-power game of Asia-Pacific digital trade governance will be centered on China and the United States, but it is not ruled out that small and medium-sized economies will also “join together” to fight for the right to speak on certain issues.

参考文献/References:

[1] UNCTAD.Trade data for 2020 confirm growing importance of digital technologies duringCOVID-19[EB/OL].(2021-10-27)[2022-01-22].https://unctad.org/news/trade-data-2020-confirm-growing-importance-digital-technologies-during-covid-19.
[2]周念利,吴希贤.美式数字贸易规则的发展演进研究——基于《美日数字贸易协定》的视角[J].亚太经济,2020(2):44-51.
[3]BURRI,MIRA.Towards a new treaty on digital trade[J].Journal of worldtrade,2021,55(1):77-100.
[4]赵旸頔,彭德雷.全球数字经贸规则的最新发展与比较——基于对《数字经济伙伴关系协定》的考察[J].亚太经济,2020(4):58-69.
[5]杨泽瑞.DEPA对亚太合作意味着什么[J].世界知识,2020(23):68-69.
[6]ATKINSON C,SCHUBERT N.Augmenting MSME participation in trade with policy digitalization efforts:Chile's contribution to ‘an internet of rules'[J].Trade,law and development,2021,13(1):80-111.
[7]全毅.后茂物时代亚太地区大国博弈与区域合作前景[J].国际贸易,2021(10):13-20.
[8]彭扬.中国申请“入群” 数字经济如何发展至今[J].科学大观园,2021(22):16-19.
[9]邵育群.从拜登政府全球战略看美国印太战略的主要特点和发展趋势[EB/OL].(2021-07-14)[2022-01-22].http://www.siiss.org.cn/newsinfo/1700266.html.
[10]周念利,孟克.美国拜登政府的数字贸易治理政策趋向及我国应对策略[J].太平洋学报,2021,29(10):55-63.
[11]吴力.申请入“群”,中国为何倾心DEPA?[N].国际商报,2021-12-02(2).
[12]SOPRANA M.The digital economy partnership agreement(DEPA):assessing thesignificance of the New Trade Agreement on the block [J].Trade law and development,2021(1):143-169.
[13]孙晓.DEPA与全球数字经济治理[J].中国金融,2021(23):79-80.
[14]石静霞.数字经济背景下的WTO电子商务诸边谈判:最新发展及焦点问题[J].东方法学,2020(2):170-184.
[15]梅冠群.全球数字服务贸易发展现状及趋势展望[J].全球化,2020(4):62-77.
[16]刘毅群,章昊渊,吴硕伟.美欧数字贸易规则的新主张及其对中国的启示[J].学习与实践,2020(6):49-56.
[17]竺彩华,刘让群.中美博弈对国际经贸规则体系重构的影响[J].太平洋学报,2021,29(4):1-14.
[18]裘莹,袁红林,戴明辉.DEPA数字贸易规则创新促进中国数字价值链构建与演进研究[J].国际贸易,2021,(12):34-42.
[19]中国商务新闻网.中国亟需关注《数字贸易伙伴关系协定(DEPA)》[EB/OL].(2021-09-18)[2022-01-22].http://www.comnews.cn/article/zjgd/202109/202
10900086563.shtml.
[20]周密.中国加入DEPA:推动全球数字经济创新合作[J].世界知识,2021(22):62-63.
[21]尹童.东盟的数字经济发展[J].国际研究参考,2021(10):17-22.
[22]邱静.欧美数字治理合作的影响因素及前景分析[J].国际论坛,2022,24(1):44-61.
[23]孙冰岩.2020年美国大选:决胜因素、选举特点与政治困局[J].国际关系研究,2021(1):82-109.
[24]盘和林.中国为什么申请加入《数字经济伙伴关系协定》[J].小康,2022(4):22-23.
[25]CGGT.东南亚数字经济:马来西亚《2030年共享繁荣愿景》为中企带来数字基础设施建设机遇[EB/OL].(2019-12-25)[2022-01-22].https://www.sohu.com/a/362762048_610982.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈寰琦,陆锐盈.DEPA数据安全规则解析及对中国的启示 ——基于和CPTPP/USMCA/RCEP的比对[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2022,(02):22.
 CHEN Huanqi,LU Ruiying.Analysis on data security rules in DEPA and its implication to China——based on comparison withCPTPP/USMCA/RCEP[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2022,(02):22.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-01-10
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目(19AGJ012); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(ZD3-07); 对外经济贸易大学北京对外开放研究院研究生智库课题资金资助项目(2022YJS02)
作者简介:周念利(1977-),女,湖北安陆人,教授,博士研究生导师,经济学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-05-20