|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈寰琦,陆锐盈.DEPA数据安全规则解析及对中国的启示 ——基于和CPTPP/USMCA/RCEP的比对[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2022,(02):22-31.
 CHEN Huanqi,LU Ruiying.Analysis on data security rules in DEPA and its implication to China——based on comparison withCPTPP/USMCA/RCEP[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2022,(02):22-31.
点击复制

DEPA数据安全规则解析及对中国的启示 ——基于和CPTPP/USMCA/RCEP的比对(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
22-31
栏目:
国际经济与贸易
出版日期:
2022-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on data security rules in DEPA and its implication to China——based on comparison withCPTPP/USMCA/RCEP
文章编号:
1671-6248(2022)02-0022-10
作者:
陈寰琦陆锐盈
(广东外语外贸大学 经济贸易学院,广东 广州 510006)
Author(s):
CHEN Huanqi LU Ruiying
(School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China)
关键词:
数字贸易规则 区域贸易协定 数据安全规则 《数字经济伙伴关系协定》 《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》 《美墨加协定》 《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》
Keywords:
digital trade rule regional trade agreement data security rule Digital Economy Partnership Agreement(DEPA) Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership(CPTPP) United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement(USMCA) Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP)
分类号:
F744; F49
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
构建数据安全规则是推进全球数字贸易治理的重要关切,中国申请加入《数字经济伙伴关系协定》(DEPA)后,需要在RTAs框架下,基于数据安全视角对DEPA 进行规则解析。采用自然语言识别法梳理DEPA数据安全规则体系,针对数据安全核心议题——跨境数据自由流动、数据存储非强制本地化、个人信息保护等,结合“特定规则”和“一般性规则”分析,通过文本比较评析DEPA和CPTTP、USMCA、RCEP等既有协定在这些议题上的覆盖范围、承诺深度的趋同和分歧。研究认为,DEPA针对跨境数据自由流动和数据存储非强制本地化所构建的规则,在推动数据流动自由化和保留自主监管空间两方面都处于中游水平; DEPA的个人信息保护覆盖范围比较广泛,特别强调数据保护可信任标志的使用。中国申请加入DEPA能够推动中国和DEPA在数据流动等议题上进一步确定和磋商,推进中国参与国际层面规则构建的进程、完善国内法律法规的有关规制,对中国申请加入CPTPP乃至其他RTAs协议的谈判都有积极作用,能够提高中国在数字贸易治理中的国际影响力。
Abstract:
Establishing data security rules is an important concern for advancing global digital trade governance. After China has applied to join the Digital Economy Partnership Agreement(DEPA), it is necessary to analyze the rules of DEPA from the perspective of data security under the framework of RTAs. Therefore, the natural language recognition method is used to sort out the DEPA data security rule system. Focusing on the core data security issues including “free flow of cross-border data”, “unforced data storage localization” and “personal information protection”, text comparison based on the study on “specific rules” and “general rules” is used to analyze the convergence and divergence of commitment coverage and depth between DEPA and existing agreements including CPTTP, USMCA and RCEP. According to this research, the DEPA rules on “free flow of cross-border data” and “unforced data storage localization” are in the middle level in promoting the liberalization of data flow and preserving the space for autonomous regulation. The scope of DEPA's “personal information protection” is relatively broad, with special emphasis on the use of the “data protection trust mark”. China's application to join DEPA can promote China and DEPA to further determine and negotiate on issues such as data flow, promote the construction of China's international rules and improve the relevant regulations of domestic laws and rules, exert a positive effect on China's application to join the CPTPP and even on the negotiation of other RTAs, and can enhance China's international influence in digital trade governance.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王中美.跨境数据流动的全球治理框架:分歧与妥协[J].国际经贸探索,2021,37(4):98-112.
[2]赵旸頔,彭德雷.全球数字经贸规则的最新发展与比较——基于对《数字经济伙伴关系协定》的考察[J].亚太经济,2020(4):58-69,149.
[3]杨泽瑞.DEPA对亚太合作意味着什么[J].世界知识,2020(23):68-69.
[4]FAY F,CIURIAK D.The Digital Economic Partnership Agreement:should Canada join?[EB/OL].(2021-01-08)[2022-01-03].https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3875736.
[5]ELMS D.Advancing digital trade in Asia[EB/OL].(2020-10-15)[2022-01-03].https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GFC_Advancing_Digital_Trade_in_Asia_2020.pdf.
[6]SOPRANA M.The Digital Economy Partnership Agreement(DEPA):assessing the significance of the New Trade Agreement on the Block[J].Trade,law and development,2021,13(1):143-169.
[7]AARONSON S A.Transatlantic priorities:data governance[J].Intereconomics:review of european economic policy,2021,56:59-60.
[8]马光.FTA数据跨境流动规制的三种例外选择适用[J].政法论坛,2021,39(5):14-24.
[9]刘瑛.信用视角下的数据安全法律规制[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,44(1):79-93.
[10]赵精武,周瑞珏.隐私计算技术:数据流动与数据安全的协同保护规则构建[J].信息通信技术与政策,2021(7):53-58.
[11]许可.自由与安全:数据跨境流动的中国方案[J].环球法律评论,2021(1):22-37.
[12]洪延青.数据竞争的美欧战略立场及中国因应——基于国内立法与经贸协定谈判双重视角[J].国际法研究,2021(6):69-81.
[13]冯洁菡,周蒙.跨境数据流动规制:核心议题、国际方案及中国因应[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,38(4):88-97.
[14]陈寰琦,周念利.从USMCA看美国数字贸易规则核心诉求及与中国的分歧[J].国际经贸探索,2019,35(6):104-114.
[15]周念利,姚亭亭,黄宁.数据跨境流动壁垒对数字服务贸易二元边际影响的经验研究[J].国际经贸探索,2022,38(2):4-21.
[16]ELMS D.China applies to join DEPA[EB/OL].(2021-11-04)[2021-11-23].http://asiantradecentre.org/talkingtrade/china-applies-to-join-depa.
[17]白洁,张达,王悦.数字贸易规则的演进与中国应对[J].亚太经济,2021(5):53-61.
[18]王燕.跨境数据流动治理的国别模式及其反思[J].国际经贸探索,2022,38(1):99-112.
[19]BURRI M.Approaches to digital trade and data flow regulation across jurisdictions[J].The journal of world investment & trade,2021,22:1-18.
[20]石静霞,韩天竹,杨幸幸.WTO服务贸易法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2021.
[21]张新宝.《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》释义[M].北京:人民出版社,2021.
[22]张光,宋歌.数字经济下的全球规则博弈与中国路径选择——基于跨境数据流动规制视角[J].学术交流,2022(1):96-113,192.
[23]曹杰,王晶.跨境数据流动规则分析——以欧美隐私盾协议为视角[J].国际经贸探索,2017,33(4):107-116.
[24]AARONSON S A.Data is disruptive:how data sovereignty is challenging data governance[EB/OL].(2021-08-05)[2021-11-23].https://datagovhub.elliott.gwu.edu/2021/08/05/data-is-disruptive-how-data-sovereignty-is-challenging-data-governance.
[25]AARONSON S A,Struett T,Zable A.Comprehensive approach to data governance[EB/OL].(2021-11-01)[2021-12-05].https://sites.tufts.edu/digitalplanet/files/2021/11/DataGovHub-Paradigm-for-a-Comprehensive-Approach-to-Data-Governance-Y1.pdf.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-01-09
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(21CGJ044); 广州市哲学社会科学规划项目(2021GZQN01)
作者简介:陈寰琦(1987-),女,广东广州人,讲师,经济学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-05-20