«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:

期数:

2025年02期

页码:

67-85

栏目:

国际经济与贸易

出版日期:

2025-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:

Analysis of the impact of low-carbon city pilot policies on corporate carbon emission performance——empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

文章编号:

1671-6248(2025)02-0067-19

作者:

李光勤¹; 李佳欣¹; 刘毛桃²

(1. 安徽财经大学 国际经济贸易学院,安徽 蚌埠 233030; 2. 上海财经大学 公共经济与管理学院,上海 200433)

Author(s):

LI Guangqin¹;  LI Jiaxin¹;  LIU Maotao²

(1. School of International Trade & Economics, Anhui University of Finance & Economics,Bengbu 233030, Anhui, China; 2. School of Public Economics and Administration,Shanghai University of Finance & Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

关键词:

低碳城市;  企业碳排放绩效;  绿色创新;  环境治理投资

Keywords:

low-carbon city;  corporate carbon emission performance;  green innovation;  investment in environmental governance

分类号:

F49

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

为了探究在“双碳”目标背景下,低碳城市试点政策的实施对企业碳排放绩效的影响问题,利用2003—2020年中国上市公司数据,采用多时点双重差分模型,从实证层面系统考察城市低碳转型对企业碳排放绩效的影响,进一步借助中介效应模型分析低碳城市试点政策对企业碳排放绩效的影响机制,并采用联合固定效应、倾向得分匹配、Heckman模型以及剔除样本等方法进行稳健性检验。研究认为,低碳城市试点政策实施显著提高了企业的碳排放绩效; 低碳城市试点的政策效应在企业所有权、行业碳排放强度和创新度、企业地区之间有所差异; 低碳城市试点政策主要通过促进城市绿色创新和企业环境治理投资两个途径以促进企业碳排放绩效的提升。研究表明,低碳城市试点政策是实现“双碳”目标的助推器,政府应当继续鼓励低碳城市试点政策的实施,进一步扩大试点地区,引导更多的城市实现低碳转型,同时引导企业参与绿色低碳转型,鼓励企业进行绿色技术创新和参与环境治理投资,助力实现“双碳”目标,加速推动经济的绿色转型进程。

Abstract:

This study investigates the implementation impact of low-carbon city pilot policies on corporate carbon emission performance in the context of China's “dual carbon” goals. Using data from Chinese listed companies between 2003 and 2020, a multi-period difference-in-differences model was employed to empirically and systematically examine how urban low-carbon transformations influence corporate carbon emissions. Additionally, a mediation model was used to analyze the underlying mechanisms through which these policies affect corporate carbon emission performance. Robustness checks were conducted using methods such as joint fixed effects, propensity score matching, the Heckman model, and sample elimination. The results show that low-carbon city pilot policies significantly improve corporate carbon emission performance. The impact varies depending on corporate ownership structure, industry carbon emission intensity, innovation capacity, and regional factors. The policies primarily enhance corporate carbon emission performance by promoting urban green innovation and increasing corporate investments in environmental governance. These findings suggest that low-carbon city pilot policies are boosting factors in achieving China's “dual carbon” goals. The government is encouraged to continue expanding the implementation of these pilot policies and the pilot region, guide more cities and enterprises in transitioning to low-carbon practices, and promote corporate participation in green technological innovation and investment in environmental governance to facilitate the achievement of “dual carbon” goals and expedite the green transformation of China's economy.

参考文献/References:

[1] SINHA R K,CHATURVEDI N D.A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits[J].Renewable & sustainable energy reviews,2019,114(10):1-14.
[2]BAI C,DU K,YU Y,et al.Understanding the trend of total factor carbon productivity in the world:Insights from convergence analysis[J].Energy economics,2019,81(6):698-708.
[3]张兵兵,周君婷,闫志俊.低碳城市试点政策与全要素能源效率提升——来自三批次试点政策实施的准自然实验[J].经济评论,2021(5):32-49.
[4]郭炳南,唐利,张浩.城市低碳治理对生态效率的影响——基于低碳城市试点政策的准自然实验[J].华东经济管理,2023,37(8):82-90.
[5]王锋,葛星.低碳转型冲击就业吗——来自低碳城市试点的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):81-99.
[6]张亚连,刘巧.企业碳绩效指标体系构建及测算[J].统计与决策,2020,36(12):166-169.
[7]IOANNOU I,LI S X,SERAFEIM G.The effect of target difficulty on target completion:the case of reducing carbon emissions[J].Social science electronic publishing,2016,91(5):1467-1492.
[8]潘雄锋,袁赛.企业碳披露、绿色创新与碳绩效[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2023,33(1):112-123.
[9]周志方,李祎,肖恬,等.碳风险意识、低碳创新与碳绩效[J].研究与发展管理,2019,31(3):72-83.
[10]闫华红,蒋婕,吴启富.基于产权性质分析的碳绩效对财务绩效的影响研究[J].数理统计与管理,2019,38(1):94-104.
[11]SHAHBAZ M,HYE Q,TIWARI A.Economic growth,energy consumption,financialdevelopment,international trade,and CO₂ emissions in Indonesia[J].Renewable andsustainable energy reviews,2013,25(9):109-121.
[12]何玉,唐清亮,王开田.碳绩效与财务绩效[J].会计研究,2017(2):76-82,97.
[13]熊广勤,方扶星.低碳城市建设提升了绿色全要素生产率吗?——基于278个地级市的实证研究[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2022,367(12):101-114.
[14]邓思远,杨湘浩,叶旭.低碳城市试点政策对企业技术创新的影响研究——基于断点回归设计的实证分析[J].产业经济评论,2022(6):71-85.
[15]王贞洁,王惠.低碳城市试点政策与企业高质量发展——基于经济效率与社会效益双维视角的检验[J].经济管理,2022,44(6):43-62.
[16]黄寰,何广,肖义.低碳城市试点政策的碳减排效应[J].资源科学,2023,45(5):1044-1058.
[17]DIMARIA C,LANGE I,EDWIN V.Should we be worried about the green paradox? announcement effects of the Acid Rain Program[J].European economic review,2014,69(7):143-162.
[18]KLEMETSEN M E,BYE B,RAKNERUD A.Can direct regulations spur innovations in environmental technologies? a study on firm-levelpatenting[J].The Scandinavian journal of economics,2018,120(2):338-371.
[19]LIU B,SUN P Y,ZENG Y.Employee-related corporate social responsibilities and corporate innovation:evidence from China[J].International review of economics & finance,2020,70(8):357-372.
[20]GREENSTONE M,HANNA R.Environmental regulations,air and water pollution,andinfant mortality in India[J].American economic review,2014,104(10):3038-3072.
[21]WANG F,SUN J,LIU Y S.Institutional pressure,ultimate ownership,and corporate carbon reduction engagement:evidence from China[J].Journal of business research,2019,104(11):14-26.
[22]CHENG J H,YI J H,DAI S.Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth?evidence from China's pilot low-carbon city initiative[J].Journal of cleaner production,2019,231(9):1158-1170.
[23]YI M,WANG Y,YAN M,et al.Government R&D subsidies,environmental regulations,and their effect on green innovation efficiency of manufacturing industry:evidence from the Yangtze River economic belt of China[J].International journal of environmental research and public health,2020,17(4):1330.
[24]ZINGALES L.2000,In search of new foundations[J].Journal of finance,2000,55(4):1623-1653.
[25]王晗,何枭吟,许舜威.创新型城市试点对绿色创新效率的影响机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(4):105-114.
[26]柳卸林,杨博旭.多元化还是专业化? 产业集聚对区域创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].中国软科学,2020(9):141-161.
[27]POTER M E,LINDE C.Toward a new conception of the environment competitivenessrelationship[J].The Journal of economic perspectives,1995,9(4):97-118.
[28]MA S,DAI J,WEN H.The influence of trade openness on the level of human capital inChina:on the basis of environmental regulation[J].Journal of cleaner production,2019,225(7):340-349.
[29]李婉红,李娜.绿色创新、数字化转型与高耗能企业碳减排绩效[J].管理工程学报,2023,37(6):66-76.
[30]BU M,QIAO Z,LIU B.Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China[J].Economic modelling,2020(89):10-18.
[31]MEULEMAN M,DE MAESENEIRE W.Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs' access to external financing?[J].Research policy,2012,41(3):580-591.
[32]齐绍洲,林屾,崔静波.环境权益交易市场能否诱发绿色创新?——基于我国上市公司绿色专利数据的证据[J].经济研究,2018,5(12):129-143.
[33]崔也光,周畅,王肇.地区污染治理投资与企业环境成本[J].财政研究,2019(3):115-129.
[34]RAMBACHAN A,ROTH J.A more credible approach to parallel trends[J].Review of economic studies,2023,90(5):2555-2591.
[35]许文立,孙磊.市场激励型环境规制与能源消费结构转型——来自中国碳排放权交易试点的经验证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(7):133-155.
[36]GOODMAN-BACON A.Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing[J].Journal of econometrics,2021,225(2):254-277.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2024-06-24
基金项目:安徽省哲学社会科学基金项目(AHSKY2022D050)
作者简介:李光勤(1979-),男,四川泸县人,教授,硕士研究生导师,经济学博士。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-30