|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张茂泽.论司马迁的黄帝观[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2019,21(04):51-59.
　ZHANG Maoze.SIMA Qian’s view of the Huang Emperor[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2019,21(04):51-59.
点击复制

论司马迁的黄帝观(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
51-59
栏目:
长安学
出版日期:
2019-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
SIMA Qian’s view of the Huang Emperor
作者:
张茂泽
西北大学 中国思想文化研究所，陕西 西安 710069
Author(s):
ZHANG Maoze
Institute of Chinese Ideology and Culture, Northwest University，Xi’an 710069, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
司马迁; 黄帝; 黄帝观; 《史记》; 汉武帝; 道德史观; 中华民族共同体; 民族共同体意识
Keywords:
SIMA Qian;  Huang Emperor;  view of the Huang Emperor;  Historical Records;  Martial emperor of Han dynasty;  historical view on morality;  community of Chinese nation;  awareness of national community
分类号:
I207.5
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
司马迁撰写《史记》，以黄帝为首，其中体现的黄帝观影响后世深远，值得专门研究。学界研究黄帝，多以司马迁的记载为基本材料，但目前尚未见到专门研究司马迁黄帝观的论著。根据司马迁《史记》文本，从材料出发，用历史学方法归纳、概括司马迁黄帝观的内容，分析和揭示其背后的历史背景和条件，有助于今人科学认识历史上的黄帝观。研究认为，在司马迁之前，黄帝只是神话传说，司马迁一变而为正史实录，从根本上改变了中华文明起源的书写形式，完善了中华文明史系统；从司马迁描写的黄帝看，黄帝实有其人，有家有业，有家人，有后裔，而且有生有死，“黄帝崩，葬桥山”，传说中的人物由此变成了客观存在的历史人物.而和司马迁同时的汉武帝却惑于神仙方术，相信黄帝铸鼎飞升；司马迁的黄帝观以理性的描述内容，抑制了当时一些人神秘化历史人物的消极倾向.司马迁在描述中还隐含了道德史观在内，在他看来，黄帝之所以做出了杰出历史贡献，是因为黄帝“修德”；所以，司马迁表彰黄帝就在“彰明德”。这一观念，延续了西周以来的道德史观传统，更加凸显了道德在历史上的作用。
Abstract:
SIMA Qian wrote the Historical Records, in which the Huang Emperor was considered the most important ancestor, and the concept of the Huang Emperor has a farreaching impact on future generations and deserves dedicated research. Academic circles mostly use SIMA Qian’s records as basic materials to study the Huang Emperor, but so far there have been no works specializing in SIMA Qian’s view of the Huang Emperor. According to the text and based on the materials of SIMA Qian’s Historical Records, this paper uses historical methods to generalize and summarize the content of SIMA Qian’s view of the Huang Emperor, and analyses and reveals the historical background and conditions behind the view, which is helpful for people today to scientifically understand the view of the Huang Emperor in history. It is found that before SIMA Qian, the Huang Emperor was only a myth and legend. SIMA Qian changed the myth into an official historical record, which fundamentally reformed the writing form of the origin of Chinese civilization and improved the system of the history of Chinese civilization. From SIMA Qian’s description of the Huang Emperor, we can see that the Huang Emperor was a real person with residence, land, family and descendants, and that he had actually lived and died. “The Huang Emperor passed away, and was buried in Qiaoshan”. A legendary figure thus became an objective historical figure. Martial emperor of Han dynasty in the same era as SIMA Qian, however, was obsessed with immortal magic and believed that the Huang Emperor had casted a tripod and flown up to heaven. SIMA Qian’s view of the Huang Emperor suppressed the negative tendency of some mystifying historical figures at that time with a rational description. His description also implies the concept of moral history. In his view, the reason of the Huang Emperor made outstanding historical contributions was that the Huang Emperor “cultivated morality”. Therefore, SIMA Qian praised the Huang Emperor in that he “promoted and exhibited morality”. This concept inherited the tradition of moral history since the Western Zhou dynasty and highlighted the role of morality in history.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]张华.从《史记 五帝本纪》看司马迁的学术研究方法[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2014,16(02):20.
[2]何炳武,党 斌.黄帝时代的物质生活[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2010,12(03):14.
　HE Bing-wu,DANG Bin.Material life in the imperial time[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2010,12(04):14.
[3]霍彦儒.陕西黄帝陵“国祭”地位的形成[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):6.
　HUO Yan-ru.Formation of the position of Shaanxi Huang Emperor Mausoleum “national worshipping ceremony”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(04):6.
[4]李江辉.刘师培的黄帝明堂研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):12.
　LI Jiang-hui.LIU Shipei’s research on Huang Emperors Mingtang classi[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(04):12.
[5]卓希惠.司马迁与欧阳修传世观论评[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(01):1.
　ZHUO Xi-hui.Review of SIMA Qian and OUYANG Xiu’s concept of inheritance[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(04):1.
[6]霍彦儒.黄帝陵祭祀与中华文化自信[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(05):1.
　HUO Yan-ru.Sacrifice of Huangdi Mausoleum and confidence of Chinese culture[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(04):1.
[7]高强.黄帝文化与中华民族伟大复兴[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(03):12.
　GAO Qiang.Yellow Emperor culture and the great rejuvenation of Chinese nation[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(04):12.
[8]高强.炎黄文化的滥觞与中华文明的起源[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2019,21(04):60.
　GAO Qiang.Beginning of Yan Huang culture and origin of the Chinese civilization[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2019,21(04):60.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介：张茂泽（1965-），男，四川广安人，教授，博士研究生导师，历史学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-25