|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]姜永志,陈中永.心理学中国化研究的学术分歧与立场[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(05):118-124.
 JIANG Yong-zhi,CHEN Zhong-yong.Academic disagreement and standpoint of the study of sinicization of psychology[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(05):118-124.
点击复制

心理学中国化研究的学术分歧与立场(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
118-124
栏目:
心理学
出版日期:
2018-01-03

文章信息/Info

Title:
Academic disagreement and standpoint of the study of sinicization of psychology
作者:
姜永志12陈中永2
1.内蒙古民族大学教育科学学院, 内蒙古通辽028000; 2.内蒙古师范大学教育科学学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特010010
Author(s):
JIANG Yong-zhi12CHEN Zhong-yong2
1. School of Educational Sciences, Inner Mongolia University for the Nationalities,Tongliao 028000,Inner Mongolia,China; 2. School of Educational Sciences, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010010,Inner Mongolia,China
关键词:
心理学心理学中国化学术立场科学观范式适度原则
Keywords:
psychology sinicization of psychology academic standpoint view of science paradigm moderate principle
分类号:
B84
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
心理学中国化研究议题是中国心理学未来发展不可回避的问题,中国心理学早期在学习、模仿和跟随西方心理学研究过程中初步形成了较为完善的学科体系,但早期对西方心理学的过度借鉴,导致中国心理学逐渐失去对中国人民心理本真的研究,学术界在心理学中国化研究过程中出现学术分歧。通过西方和中国心理学发展脉络对比分析,对心理学中国化研究中的科学观、研究范式、研究内容、实证资料等进行研究。研究认为,中国心理学研究者要在学术立场上形成统一认识,构建心理学本土化研究的学术传统:在科学观方面,心理学中国化应该以大科学观统摄小科学观,注重对心理规律实体性和心理规律精神性的研究,弱化方法中心论的倾向,强化问题中心论的立场;在研究范式方面,对待客观研究范式与主观研究范式应该采取“适度原则”,保持研究的科学性、有效性;合理性,从多维视角开展心理学中国化研究;在研究内容方面,以本土文化传统为根基,突破对自然科学模式或人文科学模式的依赖,改变过于强调外在形式的观念,注重对中国本土文化中的心理现象开展具有现实解释力和价值引导力的研究;在实证资料方面,在实证资料积累的基础上逐渐加强理论反思与坚守能力,使基于本土文化的心理学研究用来指导实践和服务学术发展。
Abstract:
The issue of the research on sinicization of psychology is an unavoidable problem in the future development of Chinese psychology. In the early stages of learning, imitating and following the study of western psychology, Chinese psychology has formed a relatively perfect discipline system. But the excessive reference of western psychology in the early stage has led to the gradual loss of Chinese psychological research on the Chinese people’s psychology and academic disagreement in the research process of sinicization of psychology in the academic circle. Based on the comparative analysis of psychological development in Western and Chinese psychology, the view of science, research paradigm, research content and empirical data in the study of sinicization of psychology were studied. The research suggests that Chinese psychological researchers should form a unified understanding on the academic standpoint and establish the academic tradition of the localization of psychology: in terms of the view of science, sinicization of psychology should use the view of great science to govern the view of small science, pay attention to the study of psychonomic entity and psychonomic spirit, weaken the tendency of the method centrism, and strengthen the standpoint of the problem centrism; In terms of research paradigm, the moderate principle for objective research paradigm and subjective research paradigm should adopted so as to maintain the scientificity, effectiveness and rationality of research, and the study of sinicization of psychology is carried out from a multidimensional perspective; in therms of research content, based on local cultural tradition, dependence on the natural science model or human science model should be broken through. The idea of overemphasizing the external form should be changed, and the study of psychological phenomena in Chinese native culture with realistic explanatory power and value guidance should be paid attention to; in terms of empirical data, the reflection of theory and the ability to adhere to it should be gradually strengthened based on the accumulation of empirical data, so that psychological research based on local culture can be used to guide the practice and service to the academic development.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]姜永志,白晓丽.心理学发展多样性与心理学科学化的追求[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(04):120.
 Diversity development and scientific pursuit of psychology.Diversity development and scientific pursuit of psychology[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(05):120.
[2]姜永志,张海钟.社会认同的区域文化心理研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2009,11(04):111.
 JIANG Yong-zhi,ZHANG Hai-zhong.Psychological research on regional culture of social identity[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2009,11(05):111.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(15XJC840003)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-01-04