|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]杨守戎,陆建华.生命的归宿 ——以老子“复归其根”为中心[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2010,12(02):69-72.
　YANG Shou-rong,LU Jian-hua.The life home to return to ——take Laozi “regression its” as a center[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2010,12(02):69-72.
点击复制

生命的归宿 ——以老子“复归其根”为中心(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第12卷
期数:
2010年02期
页码:
69-72
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2010-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The life home to return to ——take Laozi “regression its” as a center
作者:
杨守戎1; 陆建华2
1.安徽工商职业学院 公共教学部,安徽 合肥 230041; 2. 安徽大学 哲学系,安徽 合肥 230039
Author(s):
YANG Shou-rong1;  LU Jian-hua2
1. Department of the Public Courses, Anhui Business Vacational College, Hefei 230041, Anhui, China; 2. Department of Philosophy, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, Anhui, China
关键词:
老子;  道;  生命;  归宿
Keywords:
Laozi;  Tao;  life;  home to return to
分类号:
B223.1
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了探讨老子的生命观,从道的无物状态、有物状态入手,运用诠释学方法对老子的“复归其根”进行了新的解读。分析认为,生命属于道的有物状态,生命的本原是道,生命的归宿也是道; 在此意义上,生命归于道即是“复归其根”,亦即生命从道出发,在离道而去的同时,又向道而归,并以生命之“死”的方式完成向道而归。分析结果表明,从“物”的意义上说,“复归其根”就是构成生命的“物”由道之外回到道的有物状态、有物之道,并由道外之物转化为道中之物; 但是从根本的意义上说,“复归其根”就是为生命寻找死之“无限”。
Abstract:
To further discuss the concept of the life of Laozi, the authors, starting from Tao's nothing state, explain Laozi's “thing should return to its origin” through the hermeneutic method. The authors think that the life from Tao sends, while leaves which goes, also turns over to, and “dies” by life. In this significance, the life belongs to Tao's “regression its”, i.e. the life from Tao sends, while leaves which goes, also turns over to, and “dies” by life. Therefore, from “thing” in the significance, it is said that “regression its” constitutes the life “the thing” to return to by Tao outside to have the thing condition, to have Tao of the thing, and by Tao outside thing transformation for Tao in thing. But from the basic significance, “regression its” seeks for the life dies it “infinite”.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陆建华.道之两种状态与物之两种形态:兼及道物关系[J].安徽大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2006,30(6):5-6.
[2]任继愈.老子新译[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985.
[3]陈鼓应.老子注译及评介[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[4]陆建华.生命的超越:从“复归于婴儿”到“死而不亡”[J].安徽大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2009,33(2):6-9.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨选德.老子的社会理想及其历史嬗变[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2014,16(03):110.
　YANG Xuan-de.LAO Zi’s social ideal and its historical evolution[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2014,16(02):110.
[2]刘学智.民族精神家园:历史的回顾与当代重建[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2012,14(04):8.
　LIU Xue-zhi.National spiritual home:its historical retrospect and current reconstruction[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2012,14(02):8.
[3]郭明俊.传统文化中“和”的价值意蕴[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2010,12(03):53.
　GUO Ming-jun.Value of “harmony” in Chinese traditional culture[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2010,12(02):53.
[4]田义勇.老子与黑格尔的比较[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2010,12(04):43.
　TIAN Yi-yong.Comparative study between Lao Tzu and Hegel[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2010,12(02):43.
[5]付粉鸽.老子生命观的形上学追问[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(02):61.
　FU Fen-ge.Metaphysical exploration on Laozis view of life[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(02):61.
[6]孙以楷.超越与和谐 ——老子玄同论解读[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2002,4(02):10.
　SUN Yi-kai.Surpass and Harmony —— Understanding Lao Zi's Metaphysics[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2002,4(02):10.
[7]王慰.从老子的伦理观论人对自然的伦理责任[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2000,2(02):6.
　WANG Wei.On the moral responsibility for nature from Laozi′s point of view on morals[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2000,2(02):6.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2010-03-18 基金项目:安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2009sk031zd) 作者简介:杨守戎(1963-),男,安徽肥东人,副教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 2010-06-20