|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李江辉.刘师培的黄帝明堂研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):12-15.
　LI Jiang-hui.LIU Shipei’s research on Huang Emperors Mingtang classi[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(03):12-15.
点击复制

刘师培的黄帝明堂研究(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2016年03期
页码:
12-15
栏目:
长安学研究暨黄帝文化会议专题
出版日期:
2016-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
LIU Shipei’s research on Huang Emperors Mingtang classi
作者:
李江辉
西北大学 中国思想文化研究所，陕西 陕西 710069
Author(s):
LI Jiang-hui
Institute of Chinese Ideology and Culture, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
 ; 晚清; 刘师培; 黄帝; 明堂
Keywords:
late Qing Dynasty;  LIU Shi-pei;  Huang Emperor;  Mingtang classic
分类号:
K092
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
鉴于黄帝明堂制度在中国文化转型中的意义和作用，以及有关学者的不同见解，从典型案例刘师培的观点及其源流出发，深入分析黄帝明堂制度。分析认为，明堂制度萌芽于神农时代，正式形成于黄帝时代；黄帝明堂存在名异实同现象；明堂的功能主要是教化万民，虽然当时已从明堂中分化出承担类似功能的学校，但是仍然以明堂为主；黄帝明堂形制历来有五室、九室十二堂之分，体现了不同学派的思想。
Abstract:
Huang Emperor’s Mingtang classic has great significance and effects in Chinese cultural transition, and many scholars hold different opinions about it. Because of that, this paper analyzed Huang Emperors Mingtang classic from LIU Shi-pei’s ideas and the origin of Huang Emperors Mingtang classic. The results show that Huang Emperors Mingtang classic stemmed from the era of Shennong, came into being in the era of Huang Emperor, which has different names but similar contents. The major function of Mingtang classic is to educate the masses. Although some schools having similar function had branched from Mingtang classic, Mingtang classic still occupied an most important part. The disputes about Mingtang classic’s divisions reflects different schools opinions.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]孙董霞.周人之“德”为“明德”论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(02):1.
　SUN Dong xia.Research on “light De” of Zhou — the differences between the Shang’s “De” and Zhou’s “De”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(03):1.
[2]刘固盛.中国传统文化中的自由精神与现代启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):16.
　LIU Gu-sheng.Spirit of freedom and modern enlightenment in Chinese traditional culture[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(03):16.
[3]陈国庆,徐晓霞.试论晚清汉学与宋学之关系[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2004,6(01):1.
　CHEN Guo-qing,XU Xiao-xia.Discussion on the relationship between scholarships of Han and Song in the late Qing dynasty[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2004,6(03):1.
[4]许门友. 文化自信的学理与增强路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):13.
　XU Men-you.Several issues on cultural self-confidence[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):13.
[5]潘小慧.“安”可否作为儒家伦理实践的判准？——从“女安则为之”谈起[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):7.
　Pan Xiaohui.Can “Feeling at ease” be regarded as Confucian ethical practice?——from the perspective of “doing it with feeling at ease”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):7.
[6]周建高. 共享单车爆棚与中国城市空间结构问题[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):20.
　ZHOU Jian-gao.The boom of sharing bicycles and Chinese urban spatial structure[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):20.
[7]王光荣.共享单车发展问题系统探究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):30.
　Wang Guang-rong. Systematic research on Bicycle-sharing development[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):30.
[8]丁诺舟. 日本共享单车的历史、现状与启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):36.
　Ding Nuozhou. History, current situation and enlightenment of Japanese bicycle-sharing[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):36.
[9]杜向民,赵成威. 社会转型期公共部门行政伦理失范及其矫正路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):44.
　DU Xiang-min,ZHAO Cheng-wei. Administrative ethical anomie and rectification approach of public sectors in social transformation period[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):44.
[10]王平,孙豪,余文砚. 微信投票乱局与治道变革[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):50.
　WANG Ping,SUN Hao,YU Wen-yan. WeChat voting chaos and governance transform[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):50.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-14