|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈海明,仲 霞.国际组织的投票表决与协商一致决策机制[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2012,14(01):80-84.
　CHEN Hai-ming,ZHONG Xia.Decision-making mechanism of international organizations[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2012,14(01):80-84.
点击复制

国际组织的投票表决与协商一致决策机制(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第14卷
期数:
2012年01期
页码:
80-84
栏目:
法学
出版日期:
2012-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Decision-making mechanism of international organizations
作者:
陈海明1; 仲 霞2
1. 厦门理工学院 外语系,福建 厦门 361024; 2. 厦门大学 人文学院,福建 厦门 361005
Author(s):
CHEN Hai-ming1;  ZHONG Xia2
1. Department of International Languages, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, Fujian, China; 2. School of the Humanities, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China
关键词:
国际组织;  决策机制;  表决制;  协商一致原则
Keywords:
international organization;  decision-making mechanism;  voting system;  consensus principle
分类号:
D813.3
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为加深对国际组织各种决策机制的认识,促进国际社会的合作和国际法律秩序的发展,运用比较研究方法对国际组织投票表决制的类型与利弊以及协商一致决策机制的特征与利弊作了细致的分析。分析认为,投票表决制包括平权表决制和加权表决制,有利于发挥主权原则,促进高效合作,但是容易导致集团对抗和牺牲公平; 协商一致决策机制具有兼容并包和多赢互利的优点,但是由于时间较长而容易陷入僵局,只有综合采纳各种决策机制才能取得最佳效果。
Abstract:
In order to deepen the understanding of different decision-making mechanisms of inter-national organizations, and to promote the cooperation of international community and the development of international legal system, this paper analyzes, with a comparative method, different categories of voting system and the consensus mechanism, and their respective advantages and disadvantages. The analysis shows that as the voting system contains equality and weighting features, it is good for sovereign principle and can promote efficient cooperation, but may easily lead to confrontation and unequality among the participants while the consensus mechanism can get rid of the former problems but usually take a longer period of time, resulting in deadlock. Therefore, it is better to combine the two in the decision making to avoid the potential disadvantages.

参考文献/References:

[1] Sabel R.Procedure at international conferences[M].New York:Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[2]Vladimir D.A guide to the practice of international conferences[M].Washington D C:Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,1945.
[3]Abba E.The new diplomacy, international affairs in the modern age[M].New York:Random House,1983.
[4]IMF.IMF quotas[EB/OL].(2011-09-13)
[2011-09-29].http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/quotas.htm.
[5]IMF.IMF members' quotas and voting power,and IMF board of governors[EB/OL].(2011-09-10)
[2011-09-28].http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.htm.
[6]Wikipedia.Consensus decision-making[EB/OL].(2012-01-28)
[2012-02-12].http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making.
[7]Daniel V.Will the third conference on the Law of Sea Work according to the consensus rule?[J].AJIL,1975,69:120.
[8]Jens E.Working methods and procedures in the Third United Nations conference on the Law of Sea[J].RCADI,1986,199(IV):486.
[9]Barry B.Negotiating by consensus:developments in technique at the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea[J].AJIL,1981,75:326.
[10]Alan B,Christine C.The making of International Law[M].London:Oxford University Press,2007.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2011-12-15 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC820006); 厦门理工学院高层次人才项目(YSK11006R) 作者简介:陈海明(1975-),男,江西赣州人,讲师,法学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-03-20