|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]魏红征.中国社会转型视域下的“民生”价值意蕴[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(01):84-89，96.
　WEI Hong-zheng.Value implication of the people's livelihood from perspective of social transition in China[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(01):84-89，96.
点击复制

中国社会转型视域下的“民生”价值意蕴(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2013年01期
页码:
84-89，96
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2013-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value implication of the people's livelihood from perspective of social transition in China
作者:
魏红征
东莞理工学院 政法学院,广东 东莞 523808
Author(s):
WEI Hong-zheng
School of Political Science and Law, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, China
关键词:
社会转型;  民生;  收入分配;  价值路径
Keywords:
social transition;  people's livelihood;  income distribution;  value path
分类号:
C912
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探析中国社会转型期改善民生的基本内涵、价值理念及价值路径,在对“民生”内涵溯源与梳理的基础上,采用规范与实证相结合的方法对转型期改善民生的价值路径展开分析。分析认为:当代中国“民生”不仅具有“民生在勤”和“国计民生”的内涵,还应包含“以民为本”、“以人为本”和“主权在民”的价值理念; 改善民生的价值路径应以追求社会财富分配公平合理为出发点,实施“民富国强”的治国理念,建立公平合理的收入分配制度,防范陷入“国富民穷”、贫富差距悬殊等社会转型陷阱。
Abstract:
To explore the basic connotation, value ideas and value path of improving the people's livelihood during social transition in China, based on tracing to the source of the people's livelihood connotation and combing its development, the article adopted norms and empirical combination method to analyze the value path of improving people's livelihood. According to analysis, “the people's livelihood” not only has “the people's livelihood lies in diligence” and “national economy and the people's livelihood” connotation, but also has the “regarding the people as the foundation”, “people oriented” and “popular sovereignty” value ideas. The value path of improving the people's livelihood should make the pursuit of social fair and reasonable wealth distribution as the starting point,following the administrative philosophy of “the people rich then the country strong”, and guarding against falling into the social transition traps such as “the country strong but the people poor”, polarization of the gap between the rich and the poor and so on.

参考文献/References:

[1] 胡锦涛.扎扎实实提高社会管理科学化水平 建设中国特色社会主义管理体系[N].人民日报,2011-02-20(1).
[2]侯 华.解决民生问题是构建和谐社会的关键[J].理论前沿,2007(18):41-42.
[3]杨京宁.中国“吏治”的困境及其应对之道:试从公共权力的异化及对其有效制约角度分析[J].陕西行政学院学报,2010,24(3):60-64.
[4]王玉灵,霍有光.民主民本民生理念辨析及理论构建[J].北京行政学院学报,2011(6):6-9.
[5]孙中山.孙中山选集[M].北京:人民出版社,1981.
[6]John T H.Neoliberalism,Neoclassicism and economic welfare [J].Journal of Economic Issues,2010,44(2):359-368.
[7]黄仁宇.中国大历史[M].北京:三联书店,2008.
[8]李林林.论商鞅的强国弱民思想[J].现代商贸工业,2011(24):64-65.
[9]郭欣根.苏联解体原因的几种主要观点述评[J].社会主义研究,2003(2):11-15.
[10]Cottarelli C.Sovereign debt crisis:why in Europe and not elsewhere?[J].Intereconomics,2012,47(2):74-75.
[11]陈柳钦.中国:从“国强民富”到“民富国强”的新历程[EB/OL].(2011-06-08)
[2011-07-10].http://www.qstheory.cn/jj/jjggyfz/201106/t20110608_85372.htm.
[12]谢文斗.国家发展迅速居民收入偏低:简析改革开放30年中国经济发展和居民收入状况[EB/OL].(2010-09-28)
[2011-10-10].http://www.unicornblog.cn/user1/unicornblog/25964.html.
[13]闫 坤.对我国财政收入高速增长的深层原因分析[N].经济参考报,2008-04-25(4).
[14]Benedek W.Human security and human rights interaction[J].International Social Science Journal,2008(59):7-17.
[15]李 实.中国收入分配中的几个主要问题[J].探索与争鸣,2011(4):8-12.
[16]李 实.对基尼系数估算与分解的进一步说明:对陈宗胜教授评论的再答复[J].经济研究,2002(5):84-87.
[17] 新华社调研小分队.我国贫富差距正逼近容忍“红线”[J].理论参考,2010(7):37-38.
[18] 丛亚平,李长久.收入分配四大失衡带来经济社会风险[N].经济参考报,2010-05-21(8).
[19]鄢烈山.“不患寡而患不均”正义[N].江南时报,2004-11-02(3).
[20]杨 帆.权力资本化:腐败的根源[J].决策与信息,2001(5):27-28.
[21]邓小平.邓小平文选:第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1993.
[22]李 实.和谐社会与社会公平[C]//北京师范大学,北京市社会科学界联合会.前沿 创新 发展:学术前沿论坛十周年纪念文集(2001 ～ 2010).北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011:129-135.

相似文献/References:

[1]王平,石磊,张玲赟.双重理性视阈下近代中国嬗变轨迹与逻辑理路[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2019,21(05):65.
　WANG Ping,SHI Lei,ZHANG Lingyun.Revolution path and development logic of modern China under the perspective of dual rationalities[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2019,21(01):65.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2012-10-12 基金项目:西安市社会科学规划基金重点项目(12S26); 东莞理工学院创新人才计划项目(J201134) 作者简介:魏红征(1978-),男,陕西西安人,讲师,管理学硕士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-03-20