|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]石现明.国际商事仲裁一裁终局的相对性[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2009,11(04):55-60.
　SHI Xian-ming.Relativities of finality of arbitral award of international commercial arbitration[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2009,11(04):55-60.
点击复制

国际商事仲裁一裁终局的相对性(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第11卷
期数:
2009年04期
页码:
55-60
栏目:
法学
出版日期:
2009-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relativities of finality of arbitral award of international commercial arbitration
作者:
石现明
云南财经大学 法学院,云南 昆明 650221
Author(s):
SHI Xian-ming
School of Law, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, Yunnan, China
关键词:
国际商事仲裁;  《中华人民共和国仲裁法》;  一裁终局;  相对性
Keywords:
international commercial arbitration;  The Arbitration Act of China;  finality of award;  relativity
分类号:
DF974
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
鉴于国内学术界普遍视一裁终局为国际商事仲裁的主要优点并将其绝对化,《中华人民共和国仲裁法》第9条规定仲裁实行绝对的一裁终局制度,运用比较分析法考察世界上主要国家和地区的国际商事仲裁立法及国际商事仲裁机构的仲裁规则。分析认为,当争议标的额较大而裁决又有错误时,以效率为价值取向的一裁终局制度会给当事人带来难以承受的损失; 世界上许多国家和地区的仲裁立法以及一些国际仲裁机构的仲裁规则都在规定仲裁裁决终局性的同时,允许当事人作出相反的约定和安排。分析结果表明,《中华人民共和国仲裁法》应当在涉外商事仲裁中摈弃绝对的一裁终局制度。
Abstract:
In Chinese academic circle, finality of awards is commonly and absolutely reputed as the most virtue and fundamental principle of international commercial arbitration, and The Arbitration Act of China stipulate that finality of arbitral award be absolutely observed in arbitration. Through analysis, this paper holds that when the stake of dispute is huge and the award is erroneous, the efficiency-oriented regime of finality of arbitral award may cause unendurable losses for the parties the legislation on arbitration in many countries and areas in the world and the arbitration rules of some international arbitration institutions allow the parties to make otherwise agreements and arrangements while stipulating finality of arbitral awards. This paper suggests that The Arbitration Act in China should abolish the absolute regime of finality of arbitral awards.

参考文献/References:

[1] 石现明.国际商事仲裁价值取向之检讨:以当事人的价值追求为视角[J].学术论坛,2007,30(9):133-139.
[2]乔 欣.比较商事仲裁[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[3]韩 健.现代国际商事仲裁法的理论与实践[M].修订本.北京:法律出版社,2000.
[4]林一飞.国际商事仲裁法律与实务[M].北京:中信出版社,2005.
[5]William H K,Noah D R.Betting the farm on international arbitration:is it time to offer an appeal option?[J].The American Review of International Arbitration,2002,11(4):531-577.
[6]Thomas J K.The transnational arbitration of high-tech disputes[R].Dallas:The Seventh Annual Transnational Commercial Arbitration Workshop,1996.
[7]Martin Hunter.International commercial dispute resolution:the challenge of the twenty-first century[J].Arbitration International,2000,16(4):379-392.
[8]Neil Kaplan.Arbitration in Asia:developments and crisis[J].Journal of International Arbitration,2002,19(2):160-181.
[9]CPR Institute.CPR Arbitral Appellate Procedures[S].
[10]施米托夫.国际贸易法文选[M].赵秀文,译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1993.
[11]陈治东.国际商事仲裁法[M].北京:法律出版社,1998.
[12]Amy J S.Ending a mud bowl:defining arbitration's finality through functional analysis[J].Georgia Law Review,2002,37:123-204.
[13]魏艳茹.ICSID仲裁撤销制度研究[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2007.
[14]ICSID secretariat.Possible improvements of the framework for ICSID arbitration[R].Washington DC:The World Bank,2004.
[15]David A G.An appellate mechanism for review of arbitral decisions in investor-state disputes:prospects and challenges[M].Berkeley:The Berkeley Electronic Press,2008.
[16]肖永平.内国、涉外仲裁监督机制之我见:对《中国涉外仲裁监督机制评析》一文的商榷[J].中国社会科学,1998,19(2):94-97.
[17]万鄂湘,于喜富.再论司法与仲裁的关系:关于法院应否监督仲裁实体内容的立法与实践模式及理论思考[J].法学评论,2004,25(3):60-69.
[18]陈 安.再论中国涉外仲裁的监督机制及其与国际惯例的接轨:兼答肖永平先生[J].仲裁与法律通讯,1998,5(1):45-48.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2009-06-17 基金项目:云南财经大学科学研究课题(80025092009) 作者简介:石现明(1968-),男,四川南充人,副教授,法学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2009-12-20