|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]魏红珊,卢衍鹏.文艺学的学科身份重建[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(03):78-82,94.
　WEI Hong-shan,LU Yan-peng.Reconstruction for cultural identity of literature and art[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):78-82,94.
点击复制

文艺学的学科身份重建 (PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第9卷
期数:
2007年03期
页码:
78-82,94
栏目:
文学研究
出版日期:
2007-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reconstruction for cultural identity of literature and art
作者:
魏红珊1; 卢衍鹏2
1.四川省社会科学院文学研究所,四川成都　610071; 2.枣庄学院中文系,山东枣庄　277160
Author(s):
WEI Hong-shan1;  LU Yan-peng2
1. Institute of Chinese Literature, Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610071, Sichuan, China; 2. Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang 277160, Shandong, China
关键词:
文学; 文艺学; 学科反思; 文化身份; 本质主义; 反本质主义
Keywords:
literature;  literature and art;  reconsidering of discipline;  cultural identity;  essential principle;  counter-essential principle
分类号:
I01
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
文化研究语境下的文艺学身份重建,存在本质主义与反本质主义两种思维方式。本质主义 坚持文艺学中的元理论、科学性、经典化;反本质主义重新定义文学性、文学自主性,并在日常生活 审美化的语境下反思文艺学的学科性。在重建文艺学的思路上,一派主张在文艺学内部进行调整, 拉近与现实的关系;另一派主张从文艺学外部重建历史化、地方化的文艺学。前者的优势在于拥有 体制性的确认和多年的学科底蕴,劣势在于守成有余而创新不足,对日新月异的文学、文化现象反 应迟钝,与社会现实、大众实际的文化活动、文艺实践等之间存在明显的脱节;后者的
Abstract:
The cultural identity of literature and art is being reconstructed under linguistic environment of cultural studies.Reconsideration of discipline on literature and art has already become a prolonged academic hot spot. There are two thinking modes:essential principle and the counter-essential one. The essential principle insists on a intrinsic theory, the scientific nature and the classics, while the counter-essential principle redefines the literature and the literature independency. Moreover, the literature and art discipline is reconsidered under esthetic linguistic environment in the daily life. In the reconstruction of literature and art, some advocate adjustment of the interior of literature and art to make it closer with the reality relations, and some insist on reconstructing history and localization of literature and art from exterior. The advantage of the former is that it has the confirmation of system and years discipline. The inferior position is slow in reacting,and is disjointed with society reality. Literature and art practice obviously run adrift of actual culture of masses. The latter advantage lies in keeping abreast of society and the times. The version has ultra-strong sensitiveness to western new culture, and is expert in the analysis in carrying out the version. The inferior position is that it lies on western theory, but its theoretical innovation is excessively insufficient. So it is not able to reinstate new structure of literature and its cultural identity.

参考文献/References:

[1]　 Jonathan Friedman. Cultural identity and global process[M].London:Sage Publications,1994.
[2]陶家俊.文化身份的嬗变[M].北京:中国社会科学 出版社,2003.
[3]罗　蒂.后哲学文化[M].黄　勇,译.上海:上海译 文出版社,1992.
[4]十四院校.文学理论基础[M].上海:上海文艺出版 社,1985.
[5]程　革.走向对话和开放的文学研究[J].文学评论, 2006,51(3):203-205.
[6]张　杰.高新技术时代经典艺术的命运[J].社会科 学辑刊,2003,29(3):154-161.
[7]和　磊.文化研究语境中文学经典的建构与重构 [J].文艺研究,2005,22(9):155-157.
[8]盖　生.文学的文化研究退潮与经典化文艺学重建 的可能[J].文艺理论与批评,2004,22(4):130-137.
[9]周小仪.西方文化关键词[M].北京:外语教学与研 究出版社,2006.
[10]陶东风.文学理论基本问题[M].北京:北京大学出 版社,2004.
[11] Jacques Derrida.This strange instiution called litera- ture:An interview with Jacques Derrida[M].Lon- don:Routledge Press,1992.
[12]陶东风.文学的祛魅[J].文艺争鸣:理论评论版, 2006,22(1):6-22.
[13]托多罗夫·巴赫金.对话理论及其他[M].蒋子华, 张　萍,译.天津:百花文艺出版社,2001.
[14]董　馨.论“文学性”的意识形态功能[J].东岳论坛, 2005,26(3):120-122.
[15]杜书瀛.新时期文艺学反思录[J].文学评论,1998, 51(5):77-88.
[16]陶东风,徐艳蕊.当代中国的文化批评[M].北京:北 京大学出版社,2006.
[17]钱中文.正视中国文学理论的危机[J].社会科学, 2006,39(1):95-98. 94长安大学学报(社会科学版)　　　　　　　　　　　　　　2007年

相似文献/References:

[1]陈志华.文艺学学科建设中的问题意识与学科意识之辨[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(01):131.
　CHEN Zhi-hua.Question and subject awareness in the subject construction of literature and art[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(03):131.
[2]张卫宏.南朝文化名士张融思想与创作的时代气息[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(01):87.
　ZHANG Wei-hong.Thought and creation of Zhang Rong[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):87.
[3]杨建国.多元文化语境下的海外华裔文学[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(02):83.
　YANG Jian-guo.Overseas Chinese literature in pluralistic cultural environment[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):83.
[4]杨琦,芮海田.新时期新闻传媒的功能和发展路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(02):91.
　YANG Qi,RUI Hai-tian.Function and developing path of news media in the new period[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):91.
[5]黄建国,关锋,马遥.文学艺术与和谐社会[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(03):83.
　HUANG Jian-guo,GUAN Feng,MA Yao.Literature& arts and harmonious society[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):83.
[6]李早霞,罗勇,刘蓉.田纳西·威廉姆斯的 《热铁皮屋顶上的猫》意象评析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(03):86.
　LI Zao-xia,LUO Yong,LIU Rong.Symbols of cat on a hot tin roof by Tennessee Williams[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):86.
[7]张秀见.论《最蓝的眼睛》中身体破损意象的双重性[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(03):90.
　ZHANG Xiu-jian.Dual implications of the physically broken images in the bluest eye[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):90.
[8]韩理洲,张争光,韩绪耀.唐代诗文中“华胥国”意象及其内涵[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(04):38.
　HAN Li-zhou,ZHANG Zheng-guang,HAN Xu-yao.Images and connotations of“Huaxu State” in poems and prose of Tang Dynasty[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):38.
[9]闫艳.美国文学分期探源[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(04):41.
　YAN Yan.Origin of American literature historical divisions[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):41.
[10]桦桢.文学意识形态社会系统[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(04):51.
　HUA Zhen.Literary ideological social system[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):51.
[11]张炜,马纯静.绘画艺术构思[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(01):91.
　ZHANG Wei,MA Chun-jing.Conception of Brushwork Art[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(03):91.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2006-12-26
基金项目:国家社会科学规划西部项目(06XZW006)
作者简介:魏红珊(1966-),女,四川成都人,副研究员,文学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2007-09-20