|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]谢兴龙,师萍,李晓峰,等.国际直接投资和经济增长的关联度 ———基于三个经济转型国家的比较研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2005,7(04):39-45.
　XIE Xing-long,SHI Ping,LI Xiao- feng,et al.Correlation degree between FDI and economic growth ——— Based on comparison of three economic transitional countries[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2005,7(04):39-45.
点击复制

国际直接投资和经济增长的关联度 ———基于三个经济转型国家的比较研究 (PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第7卷
期数:
2005年04期
页码:
39-45
栏目:
交通运输与经济
出版日期:
2005-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Correlation degree between FDI and economic growth ——— Based on comparison of three economic transitional countries
作者:
谢兴龙1; 2; 师萍1; 李晓峰2; 潘胜利2
1.西北大学经济管理学院,陕西西安　710069; 2.西安理工大学工商管理学院,陕西西安　710048
Author(s):
XIE Xing-long1; 2;  SHI Ping1;  LI Xiao- feng2;  PAN Sheng-li2
1. School of Economic Management, Northwest University, Xian 710069, China; 2. School of Business Administration, Xian University of Technology, Xian 710048, China
关键词:
经济学; 经济增长; 经济转型; 吸收能力; 外国直接投资; 投资
Keywords:
economics;  economic growth;  transitional economy;  absorptive capacity;  direct foreign investment;  investment
分类号:
K217
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
使用计量经济学模型,考察在中国、印度和巴西这3个经济转型国家的国际直接投资 (FDI)对经济增长的作用和功能以及它们之间的因果关系。FDI对经济增长的作用和影响从大到 小的顺序是中国、印度和巴西。实证结果表明,印度的吸收能力最好,巴西最差,中国位于二者之 间。流入印度的FDI只有中国的1/13. 8,是巴西的1/3. 4。但其经济增长率达到5. 5%,大大高于 巴西,较好的吸收能力是其重要原因。此外,不同类型的FDI对这3个国家的经济增长起不同的 作用。中国吸收的FDI是资本密集型,技术含量不是很高,技术
Abstract:
The paper employs the econometric approach to explore the contributions that FDI has made to economic growth in the three transitional economies:China,India and Brazil,finding out that in China FDI makes the greatest contribution, second in India, and last in Brazil. The empirical evidence discovers that India is the best in absorptive ability for FDI, next is China and last is Brazil. FDI flowing into India is only 1/13. 8 of that in China, 1/3. 4 of that in Brazil, but the growth rate is higher than that in Brazil, topping at 5. 5%(8. 5% in Chinese mainland). This fully shows the fine absorptiveness in India. In addition, different type of FDI have performed different function on the economic growth of the three countries. In China most FDIs are capital- intensified, lack of highly sophisticated modern technology. In Brazil FDI is mainly from mergering and acquisition, and it increases current assets but can not transform it into productivity. FDI in India is technologically intensified and concentrates on information sector,but due to its small scale its effect on economy on the whole is not obvious. At last, only through good cultivation of humen capitals, a rapid increase of absorptiveness and improvement of technical innovation, the three countries with transitional economy can enjoy FDI externalities and spillovers of FDL to promote their sustainable development.

参考文献/References:

[1]　孟　亮.国外FDI技术溢出效应实证研究综述[J].外 国经济与管理,2004,(6):26-29.
[2]　唐正康.国内外对跨国公司直接投资技术溢出效应的 分析[J].南阳师范学院学报(社会科学版),2003,(4): 25-31.
[3]　刘玉珂.经济增长模式比较[M].北京:经济科学出版 社,1999.
[4]　Johan Ericsson.On the causality between foreign direct investment and output[J]. The International Trade Journal,2001,(1):2-5.
[5]　王志鹏,王子奈.外商直接投资与内生经济增长[J].世 界经济文汇,2004,(3):28-29.
[6]　杨先明.国际直接投资、技术转移与中国技术发展 [M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
[7]　唐正康,廖克平.国际直接投资技术溢出效应的限制因 素分析[J].科技情报开发与经济,2003,(8):85-86.
[8]　袁　诚,陆　挺.外商直接投资与管理知识溢出效应 [J].经济研究,2005,(3):78-80.
[9]　GlaucoArbix,Mariano Laplane.Stagnation,liberaliza- tion and foreign investment in Latin America[J].Com- petition& Chance,2003,(7):119-121.

相似文献/References:

[1]李红昌,Linda Tjia,胡顺香,等.高速铁路与经济增长的因果关系[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(04):31.
　LI Hong chang,Linda Tjia,HU Shun xiang,et al.Causality relationship between high speed railway and economic growth[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(04):31.
[2]王升,吴群琪.基础设施建设的社会效用[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(01):42.
　WANG Sheng,WU Qun-qi.Social utility of infrastructure construction[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(04):42.
[3]王升,吴群琪.收入分配的效用研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(02):32.
　WANG Sheng,WU Qun-qi.Research on the utility of revenue allocation[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(04):32.
[4]梁薇,刘铮.金融资产管理公司的渐进转型研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(02):37.
　LIANG Wei,LIU Zheng.Gradual transition of China's asset management companies[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(04):37.
[5]丁华,戴宏.澳门主要旅游客源市场分析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(02):41.
　DING Hua,DAI Hong.Analysis on tourist market in Macao[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(04):41.
[6]姚广宁,吴辉凡.国有商业银行贷款风险控制滞后的原因[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(02):46.
　YAO Guang-ning,WU Hui-fan.Reasons for risk control lagging in loaning from state-owned commercial banks[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(04):46.
[7]陈柳钦.专业化分工下的产业集群演进[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(03):1.
　CHEN Liu-qin.Evolution of industrial groups under the situation of specialized division[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(04):1.
[8]谢军占,吕常影.亚当·斯密的公路经济理论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(03):30.
　XIE Jun-zhan,LV Chang-ying.Adam Smiths research on the highway economic theories[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(04):30.
[9]刘毅,何炼成.软件价值效用论与软件资本流通[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(03):42.
　LIU Yi,HE Lian-cheng.Labor value creation and capital circulation of the software[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(04):42.
[10]李方舟,李瑞娥.保险市场的产权结构、交易模式与寻租的普遍性[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(03):45.
　LI Fang-zhou,LI Rui-e.Structure of property right and way of transaction and rent- seeking in the insurance industry[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(04):45.
[11]陈国辉,李湛.基础设施对西安经济增长的影响[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(01):47.
　CHEN Guo-hui,LI Zhan.Infrastructure affect the economic growth in Xian[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(04):47.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2005-05-20
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70473073)
作者简介:谢兴龙(1968-),男,四川彭州人,西北大学经济管理学院博士生,西安理工大学工商管理学院讲师,主要从事国际贸易、国际经济研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2005-12-20