|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张瑞雪.论先秦儒家理想人格的三个层次[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2005,7(03):67-71.
　ZHANG Rui-xue.Introduction on three strata of pefrect personalities from Confucianism before the Qin dynasty[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2005,7(03):67-71.
点击复制

论先秦儒家理想人格的三个层次 (PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第7卷
期数:
2005年03期
页码:
67-71
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2005-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Introduction on three strata of pefrect personalities from Confucianism before the Qin dynasty
作者:
张瑞雪
西北大学思想文化研究所,陕西西安710069
Author(s):
ZHANG Rui-xue
Department of Thought, Northwest University, Xian 710069, China
关键词:
哲学; 中国哲学; 先秦儒家; 理想人格; 层次
Keywords:
philosophy;  Chinese philosophy;  Confucianism before the Qin dynasty;  perfect personality;  hierarchy
分类号:
B222
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
先秦儒家对理想人格进行了系统的设计和论述,他们肯定每一个体都有完善自我人格的潜 在因素和现实能力,但又非众生皆平,不同的政治阶层具有不同的理想人格,自下而上分别是君子、 贤人、圣人。这种层次性是现实等级秩序的反映,君子、贤人、圣人既是先秦儒家对庶民以上的各阶 层提出的做人要求,又是为他们划定的“成人”界限。
Abstract:
Confucianism before the Qin dynasty had systemically designed and discussed perfect personality. They affirmed that everybody had the potential diathesis and the realistic potent to consummate his perfect personality. But the potent between them was not equal. Different estate had their own perfect personality, which was respectively Man of honor, Wisdom and Sage. The stratification reflected the real-life rating. Man of honor, Wisdom and Sage were Confucian demands to each estate of how to behave, as well as the limits between every estate.

参考文献/References:

[1]　杨伯峻.春秋左传注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[2]　邬国义,胡果文,李晓路.国语译注[M].上海:上海古 籍出版社,1997.
[3]　孙希旦.礼记集解[M].北京:中华书局,1989.
[4]　杨伯峻.论语译注[M].上海:中华书局,1980.
[5]　章诗同.荀子简注[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1974.
[6]　杨伯峻.孟子译注[M].北京:中华书局,1960.
[7]　王　肃.孔子家语[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1984.
[8]　高　亨.周易大传今注[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1989.
[9]　孙希旦.礼记集解[M].北京:中华书局,1989.
[10]　黄怀信.逸周书汇校集注[M].上海:上海古籍出版 社,1995.
[11]　陈鼓应.庄子今注今译[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[12]　贾　谊.贾谊集[M].上海:上海人民出版社.1976.

相似文献/References:

[1]王国良.中国哲学的四个传统及其现代价值[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2014,16(04):81.
[2]樊小贤.张载哲学中的生态智慧探析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(01):66.
　FAN Xiao-xian.Analysis of Zhang Zais ecological philosophy[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):66.
[3]胡义成.二战后的建筑文化思潮[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(04):1.
　HU Yi-cheng.Tendencies of architectural culture after the Second World War[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):1.
[4]付粉鸽.老子生命观的形上学追问[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(02):61.
　FU Fen-ge.Metaphysical exploration on Laozis view of life[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(03):61.
[5]郭明俊.智慧与哲学智慧[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(04):68.
　GUO Ming-jun.Wisdom and philosophic wisdom[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(03):68.
[6]葛荣晋.道家哲学智慧与企业家的潇洒人生[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2005,7(03):55.
　GE Rong-jin.Taoist philosophic wisdom and entrepreneurs’ unrestrained life[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2005,7(03):55.
[7]李明.儒家“天人合一”观之价值意蕴的多重性[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(01):61.
　LI Ming.Multiple value implications of Confucian oneness of Heaven and Man[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(03):61.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2005-03-16
作者简介:张瑞雪(1978-),女,山东荷泽人,西北大学思想文化研究所博士生,主要从事中国思想史的研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2005-09-20