An Empirical Study on Appraisal of the Academic Paper in Scientific Research Evaluation System(PDF)
《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]
- Issue:
- 2017年02期
- Page:
- 58-63
- Research Field:
- 经济与管理
- Publishing date:
Info
- Title:
- An Empirical Study on Appraisal of the Academic Paper in Scientific Research Evaluation System
- Author(s):
- CHEN Feng1; CHEN Xiaojiang2; YANG Xiao3
- Northwest University
- Keywords:
- ; Research Evaluation; Top Conferences’Papers; SCI Journal papers; Computer Science
- PACS:
- G321
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- To solve the problem that there are certain limitations to the appraisal of the academic paper in scientific research evaluation system, this paper took the appraisal of academic papers concerned with computer science as example and chose one university’s scientific research evaluation criteria and indicators for performance appraisal as case to study relevant issues of academic papers appraisal. The results show that the key point of determining the value and orientation of top conference papers and SCI journal papers lies in whether to insist on correct guidance in scientific management evaluation system. In computer science, most symbolic achievements are published on the papers of international top conferences while Chinese scientific research evaluation system still puts focus on SCI journal papers, which leads to the low participation and quality of Chinese scholars’ published papers at international computer science conferences. It puts forward some suggestions, such as top conference papers should be stressed in Chinese scientific research evaluation system, the weight of different evaluation indicators should be balanced, the difference between different disciplines should be considered, quality evaluation grade of conference papers should be raised, the guidance role of evaluation system should be played, a new scientific evaluation indicators should be formulated, and the management system of scientific research evaluation should be improved. A university formulated a scientific research evaluation system which considered the difference of disciplines and specified different evaluation indicators. It also listed the journals and conferences for different disciplines, which are recognized by experts and professionals, and gave specification for quantitative indicators of journal papers and conference papers to comprehensively determine the academic and documentary values of academic papers, which made great achievements in the internationalization of academic research.
Last Update: 2017-05-23