|Table of Contents|

Political changes in the Tang and Song Dynasties and the evolution of the perceptive geographical imagery(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2019年03期
Page:
59-68
Research Field:
长安学研究暨黄帝文化会议专题
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Political changes in the Tang and Song Dynasties and the evolution of the perceptive geographical imagery
Author(s):
 MA Qiang
 School of History and Culture，Southwest University
Keywords:
 ; tang and song dynasties;  guanzhong;  chang’an;  poetry;  geographical symbol
PACS:
K928.6
DOI:
-
Abstract:
 To study the political changes in Tang and Song dynasties and the evolution of perceptive geographical imagery, this article uses literature review method to systematically studies the changes in cultural images of Guanzhong and Qinling area in poetry of Tang and Song dynasties. Study shows that the Guanzhong area in the Tang and Song Dynasties experienced great political changes from the imperial capital to the "previous capital". The geographical image of Guanzhong in Tang and Song poetry also revealed a different cultural perception. Chang’an in Tangdu was not only the capital of the empire, but also the destination of countless literati to realize their political dreams. Therefore, there were poems of Chang’s generation titled Chang’an. The poems of Chang’an and Guanzhong played a considerably important role, which depicted and admired the magnificent atmosphere of the area. In the Song Dynasty, the capital was moved eastward, and Chang’an-Guanzhong lost its status as a national political center. The large number of historical relics of the Zhou, Qin, Han and Tang Dynasties in the Guanzhong Plain triggered the sorrow in many souls of the Song Dynasty. The Chang’an visits to ancient poems in the Song Dynasty always left people mourning about the vicissitudes. In the Tang and Song poems, the Qinling mountain was considered the career watershed of the scholar-officials in the Tang Dynasty. It was a symbol of hermit culture in the Northern Song Dynasty. While in the Southern Song Dynasty, it became a geographic symbol for the patriots to conduct Northern Expedition and the restoration of the Central Plains. The analysis of the changes of the Guanzhong and Qinling cultural images in the Tang and Song poems is undoubtedly of great significance for understanding the historical status and cultural significance of a traditional political center with important political and geographical significance.

References:

［1］阙维民.历史地理学的观念：叙述、复原、构想［M］.杭州：浙江大学出版社，2000.
［2］张伟然.湖北历史文化地理研究［M］.武汉:湖北教育出版社,2000.
［3］左鹏.原型空间初论——以白居易的江州诗为例［J］.历史地理,2002,18:206-281.
［4］左鹏.唐代曲江空间意义的透视［J］.历史地理,2003,19:325-349.
［5］左鹏.论唐诗中的江南意象［J］.江汉论坛,2004(3):95-98.
［6］潘晟.感受与事实之间——宋人诗文所记汉水中下游河流景观及其解释［J］.中国历史地理论丛,2002(2):38-44,157.
［7］张伟然.唐人心目中的文化区域及地理意象［C］//李孝聪.唐代地域结构与运作空间.北京:上海辞书出版社,2003:307-325.
［8］马强.唐宋时期中国西部地理认知研究［M］.北京：人民出版社，2009.
［9］马强.论唐宋黔中诗的历史地理意象及其意义［J］.长江师范学院学报,2013,29(2):8-12.
［10］刘昫.旧唐书［M］.北京:中华书局,1996.
［11］彭定求.全唐诗［M］.北京：中华书局,1960，年版.
［12］邵博.邵氏闻见后录［M］.北京:中华书局,1983.
［13］陆游.老学庵笔记［M］.北京:中华书局,1979.
［14］张礼.游城南记［M］.史念海,曹尔琴,校注.西安:三秦出版社,2003.
［15］李昉.文苑英华［M］.北京：中华书局，1966.
［16］孟浩然.孟浩然诗集［M］.扬州：广陵书社，2016.
［17］白居易.白氏长庆集［M］.长春：吉林出版集团，2005.
［18］王禹偁.小畜集［M］.长春：吉林出版集团，2005.
［19］杨亿,韩琦.武夷新集［M］.长春：吉林出版集团，2005.
［20］文同.丹渊集、竹友集［M］.长春：吉林出版集团，2005.
［21］陆游.剑南诗稿［M］.长春：吉林出版集团，2005.
［22］汪元量.增订湖山类稿［M］.李一氓,校订.北京：中华书局,1984.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-08-23