|Table of Contents|

Promoting the effective improvement in quality and reasonable growth in quantity in the economy(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2023年01期
Page:
53-59
Research Field:
马克思主义理论研究
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Promoting the effective improvement in quality and reasonable growth in quantity in the economy
Author(s):
CHAO Xiaojing1; 2;  WANG Can1
(1. School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127,Shaanxi, China; 2. Institute of Western China Economic Development, Northwest University,Xi'an 710127, Shaanxi, China)
Keywords:
quality of economic development;  economic growth;  high-quality development;  Chinese path to modernization;  common prosperity
PACS:
F015
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that we should “promote the effective improvement in quality and reasonable growth in quantity in the economy”. With the outstanding achievements of China's economic development in the new era and the changes in the current domestic and foreign economic situation, improving the quality of economic development has entered a new stage. It is necessary to put forward higher goals and tasks, promote more substantive measures, and form a more effective evaluation method. To achieve common prosperity of a huge population in the world, we need to have a larger economic volume as the basis, maintain a certain economic growth rate and set scientific and reasonable economic growth targets. The transformation from development in quantity to quality and then to the unity of development both in quantity and quality indicates that China has entered a new stage of promoting high-quality economic development. Reasonable growth in quantity lays a solid foundation for effective improvement in quality, and effective improvement in quality in turn provides the driving force for reasonable growth in quantity. High-quality economic development is the combined result of effective improvement in quality and reasonable growth in quantity, and is also the essential requirement of the Chinese path to modernization.

References:

[1] 杨耀武,张平.中国经济高质量发展的逻辑、测度与治理[J].经济研究,2021,56(1):26-42.
[2]黄群慧.新时代中国经济发展的历史性成就与规律性认识[J].当代中国史研究,2022,29(5):23-35,156-157.
[3]张占斌,毕照卿.经济高质量发展[J].经济研究,2022,57(4):21-32.
[4]中国式现代化研究课题组,高培勇,黄群慧.中国式现代化的理论认识、经济前景与战略任务[J].经济研究,2022,57(8):26-39.
[5]张军.大国经济:中国如何走好下一程[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2022.
[6]刘鹤.必须实现高质量发展[N].人民日报,2021-11-24(6).
[7]汤铎铎,刘学良,倪红福,等.全球经济大变局、中国潜在增长率与后疫情时期高质量发展[J].经济研究,2020,55(8):4-23.
[8]任保平.新时代中国经济从高速增长转向高质量发展:理论阐释与实践取向[J].学术月刊,2018,50(3):66-74,86.
[9]程名望,贾晓佳,仇焕广.中国经济增长(1978—2015):灵感还是汗水?[J].经济研究,2019,54(7):30-46.
[10]李静,刘霞辉,楠玉.提高企业技术应用效率 加强人力资本建设[J].中国社会科学,2019(6):63-84,205.
[11]刘志彪,凌永辉.结构转换、全要素生产率与高质量发展[J].管理世界,2020,36(7):15-29.
[12]高培勇,袁富华,胡怀国,等.高质量发展的动力、机制与治理[J].经济研究,2020,55(4):4-19.
[13]郭晗,任保平.中国式现代化进程中的共同富裕:实践历程与路径选择[J].改革,2022(7):16-25.
-------
---NEXT MATCH---
[1] 姚鹏,叶振宇.中国区域协调发展指数构建及优化路径分析[J].财经问题研究,2019(9):80-87.
[2]常冉,杨来科,张皞.中国八大区域供需双循环与双重价值链分工——利用IRIOT-WIOT投入产出表的价值链分析[J].西部论坛,2021,31(1):32-47.
[3]习近平.推动形成优势互补高质量发展的区域经济布局[EB/OL].(2019-12-15)[2022-10-29].http://www.qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/2019-12/15/c_1125346157.htm.
[4]安同良,杨晨.互联网重塑中国经济地理格局:微观机制与宏观效应[J].经济研究,2020(2):4-19.
[5]李俊杰,姬浩浩.“东数西算”驱动西部地区经济增长的内在机理与对策[J].中州学刊,2022(9):23-30.
[6]刘志彪,孔令池.从分割走向整合:推进国内统一大市场建设的阻力与对策[J].中国工业经济,2021(8):20-36.
-------
---NEXT MATCH---
[1] 庄贵阳,徐成龙,薄凡.新发展格局下增强现代化经济体系韧性的策略[J].经济纵横,2021(4):52-61.
[2]张学俊,尹训飞,马甜.着力提升供应链弹性与产业链韧性[J].中国经济评论,2021(2):46-49.
[3]杨继军,金梦圆,张晓磊.全球供应链安全的战略考量与中国应对[J].国际贸易,2022(1):51-57,96.
[4]沈小平.我国供应链脆弱性缓释与自主可控策略研究[J].当代经济管理,2021(10):17-23.
[5]宋华,杨雨东.中国产业链供应链现代化的内涵与发展路径探析[J].社会科学文摘,2022(2):48-50.
[6]刘婧怡.供应链中断:成因、后果及对策——供应链治理视角下的文献述评[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2022(4):130-144.
[7]王静.数字化供应链转型升级模式及全链路优化机制研究[J].经济学家,2022(9):59-68.
[8]曲永义.产业链链长的理论内涵及其功能实现[J].中国工业经济,2022(7):7-26.
[9]易宇,陈曦.我国制造业布局现状与优化升级[J].宏观经济管理,2022(9):8-13.
[10]王中美.欧美供应链韧性战略的悖论与中国应对[J].太平洋学报,2022(1):36-50.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-03-01