|Table of Contents|

Distribution of proof liability in unjustified benefits case(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2010年03期
Page:
87-91
Research Field:
法学
Publishing date:
2010-09-20

Info

Title:
Distribution of proof liability in unjustified benefits case
Author(s):
MIN Lei
School of Civil, Commercial and Economic Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
Keywords:
unjustified benefit;  burden of proof;  negative fact;  legal requirement
PACS:
D923.1
DOI:
-
Abstract:
There are many negative facts involved in the case of unjustified benefits, which are distinctive features in comparison with other cases. In the cases of unjustified benefits, the burden of proof should be specified in terms of different types, and even in every legal requirement. In the current legislative system of China, the claimant or applicant who brings the case has the burden to prove that his or her claim is a good one, but sometimes does not have to cling to the principle in terms of the particulars. An example of the latter is when some negative facts are proved; the judge often makes a different distribution of the burden of proof in those cases. Therefore, it is necessary to seek theoretical statements to make it clear.

References:

[1] 李 维.试论举证责任的分配[J].法学杂志,2002,23(1):47-48.
[2]陈荣宗.举证责任分配与民事程序法[M].台北:三民书局有限公司,1984.
[3]肖建华,肖建国,金殿华,等.民事证据规则与法律适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2005.
[4]张卫平.民事证据制度研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
[5]江 平.民法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007.
[6]李 浩.民事证据的若干问题:兼评最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的司法解释》[J].法学研究.2002,24(3):63-76.
[7]叶自强.民事证据研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.
[8]毕玉谦.民事证明责任研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[9]江 伟.民事诉讼法学案例教程[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007.
[10]汉斯·普维庭.现代证明责任问题[M].吴 越,译.北京:法律出版社,2000.
[11]张永泉.民事证据采信制度研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
[12]毕玉谦.民事证据原理与实务研究[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2004.
[13]韩象乾.民事证据理论新探[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2006.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2010-09-20