|Table of Contents|

Reflection and reshaping on prohibition of analogy in criminal law(PDF)

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2010年03期
Page:
92-96,112
Research Field:
法学
Publishing date:
2010-09-20

Info

Title:
Reflection and reshaping on prohibition of analogy in criminal law
Author(s):
YU Xiao-hai
School of Graduate, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
Keywords:
prohibition of analogy analogical interpretation amplified interpretation the human rights
PACS:
D924.1
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The view of the prohibition of analogy and permission of analogy is carried out at different positions, which correspond the possibility and impossibility of distinction between analogical interpretation and amplified interpretation in different contexts. It can not distinguish between the analogical interpretation and amplified interpretation in the face of specific problems. In modern society, the reference of prohibition of analogy only has an abstract symbol function, what prohibition of analogy really prohibits is the analogical interpretation which has no need for punishment, infringes and threats the human rights.

References:

[1] 张明楷.刑法分则的解释原理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[2]陈兴良.刑法哲学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[3]周 密.罪刑法定还是法律类推[J].法学研究,1980(5):23-29.
[4]高铭暄,马克昌.刑法学[M].2版,北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[5]杜 宇.刑法上之“类推禁止”如何可能?——一个方法论上的悬疑[J].中外法学,2006,19(4):407-425.
[6]赵秉志.刑法基本理论专题研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2005.
[7]张明楷.刑法学[M].3版.北京:法律出版社,2007.
[8]马克昌.刑法学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
[9]许发民,徐光华.罪刑法定视野下的禁止类推解读[C]//李明发.安徽大学法律评论:第1辑.合肥:安徽大学出版社,2008.
[10]沈 琪.刑事裁判中类推思维的作用及其运用:一种基于方法论意义的思考[J].政法论坛,2007,25(6):114-125.
[11]黎 宏.“禁止类推解释”之质疑[J].法学评论,2008,1(5):45-50.
[12]许 浩.刑法解释的基本立场:对实用主义法律解释观的论证[J].东方法学,2008,1(6):137-148.
[13]周少华.“类推”与刑法之“禁止类推”原则:一个方法论上的阐释[J].法学研究,2004(5):58-70.
[14]刘明祥.论刑法学中的类推解释[J].法学家,2008(2):61-68.
[15]陈兴良.罪刑法定司法化研究[J].法律科学,2005,23(4):38-48.
[16]刘志远.刑法解释的限度:合理的扩大解释与类推解释的区分[J].国家检察官学院学报,2002,10(5):18-24.
[17]吴丙新.扩张解释与类推解释之界分:近代法治的一个美丽谎言[J].当代法学,2006,20(6):48-53.
[18]高铭暄.中华人民共和国刑法的孕育和诞生[M].北京:法律出版社,1981.
[19]胡云腾.废除类推及刑法科学化[J].法学研究,1995(5):55-69.
[20]陈兴良.组织男性从事同性性交易行为之定性研究:对李宁案的分析[J].国家检察官学院学报,2005,13(1):119-127.
[21]最高人民法院刑事审判第一庭,最高人民法院刑事审判第二庭.刑事审判参考:第3集[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[22]考夫曼.法律哲学[M].刘幸义,等,译.北京:法律出版社,2005.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2010-09-20