|Table of Contents|

Reconstructing administrative review as the mandatory pre-procedure(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2008年04期
Page:
63-69
Research Field:
法学
Publishing date:
2008-12-20

Info

Title:
Reconstructing administrative review as the mandatory pre-procedure
Author(s):
ZHOU Lan-ling
Judicial Administration Institute of the Ministry of Justice, Beijing 100125, China
Keywords:
administrative review;  administrative litigation;  mandatory pre-procedure;  litigational procedure
PACS:
DF31; DF74
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to rationalize the relationship between administrative review and administrative litigation and to make administrative litigation easier to run, China's should streamline the relationship between administrative review and administrative litigation in the legislation. The relationship between administrative review and administrative litigation should be in line with China's traditional cultural basis, the social function of the executive power, rights and interests of people, and the need to improve the court's efficiency. The use of administrative review as the mandatory pre-procedure for administrative litigation has far more advantages than the disadvantages. It can rationalize different systems and make their respective functions to maximization.

References:

[1] 应松年,杨伟东.中国行政法学20年研究报告[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008.
[2]弗里德里希·卡尔·冯·萨维尼.论立法与法学的当代使命[M].许章润,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
[3]H·W·埃尔曼.比较法律文化[M].贺卫方,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2002.
[4]费孝通.乡土中国生育制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
[5]彼得·斯坦,约翰·香德.西方社会的法律价值[M].王献平,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2004.
[6]亚历山大·汉密尔顿,约翰·杰伊,詹姆斯·麦迪逊.联邦党人文集[M].程逢如,在 汉,舒 逊,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[7]廖义男.行政诉讼法对诉愿审理之影响[R].台北:台北市政府诉愿审议委员会,2004.
[8]马怀德.司法改革与行政诉讼制度的完善[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[9]A·J·M·米尔恩.人的权利与人的多样性[M].夏 勇,张志铭,译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1995.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2008-12-20