|Table of Contents|

Reconstruction for cultural identity of literature and art(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2007年03期
Page:
78-82,94
Research Field:
文学研究
Publishing date:
2007-09-20

Info

Title:
Reconstruction for cultural identity of literature and art
Author(s):
WEI Hong-shan1;  LU Yan-peng2
1. Institute of Chinese Literature, Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610071, Sichuan, China; 2. Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang 277160, Shandong, China
Keywords:
literature;  literature and art;  reconsidering of discipline;  cultural identity;  essential principle;  counter-essential principle
PACS:
I01
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The cultural identity of literature and art is being reconstructed under linguistic environment of cultural studies.Reconsideration of discipline on literature and art has already become a prolonged academic hot spot. There are two thinking modes:essential principle and the counter-essential one. The essential principle insists on a intrinsic theory, the scientific nature and the classics, while the counter-essential principle redefines the literature and the literature independency. Moreover, the literature and art discipline is reconsidered under esthetic linguistic environment in the daily life. In the reconstruction of literature and art, some advocate adjustment of the interior of literature and art to make it closer with the reality relations, and some insist on reconstructing history and localization of literature and art from exterior. The advantage of the former is that it has the confirmation of system and years discipline. The inferior position is slow in reacting,and is disjointed with society reality. Literature and art practice obviously run adrift of actual culture of masses. The latter advantage lies in keeping abreast of society and the times. The version has ultra-strong sensitiveness to western new culture, and is expert in the analysis in carrying out the version. The inferior position is that it lies on western theory, but its theoretical innovation is excessively insufficient. So it is not able to reinstate new structure of literature and its cultural identity.

References:

[1]　 Jonathan Friedman. Cultural identity and global process[M].London:Sage Publications,1994.
[2]陶家俊.文化身份的嬗变[M].北京:中国社会科学 出版社,2003.
[3]罗　蒂.后哲学文化[M].黄　勇,译.上海:上海译 文出版社,1992.
[4]十四院校.文学理论基础[M].上海:上海文艺出版 社,1985.
[5]程　革.走向对话和开放的文学研究[J].文学评论, 2006,51(3):203-205.
[6]张　杰.高新技术时代经典艺术的命运[J].社会科 学辑刊,2003,29(3):154-161.
[7]和　磊.文化研究语境中文学经典的建构与重构 [J].文艺研究,2005,22(9):155-157.
[8]盖　生.文学的文化研究退潮与经典化文艺学重建 的可能[J].文艺理论与批评,2004,22(4):130-137.
[9]周小仪.西方文化关键词[M].北京:外语教学与研 究出版社,2006.
[10]陶东风.文学理论基本问题[M].北京:北京大学出 版社,2004.
[11] Jacques Derrida.This strange instiution called litera- ture:An interview with Jacques Derrida[M].Lon- don:Routledge Press,1992.
[12]陶东风.文学的祛魅[J].文艺争鸣:理论评论版, 2006,22(1):6-22.
[13]托多罗夫·巴赫金.对话理论及其他[M].蒋子华, 张　萍,译.天津:百花文艺出版社,2001.
[14]董　馨.论“文学性”的意识形态功能[J].东岳论坛, 2005,26(3):120-122.
[15]杜书瀛.新时期文艺学反思录[J].文学评论,1998, 51(5):77-88.
[16]陶东风,徐艳蕊.当代中国的文化批评[M].北京:北 京大学出版社,2006.
[17]钱中文.正视中国文学理论的危机[J].社会科学, 2006,39(1):95-98. 94长安大学学报(社会科学版)　　　　　　　　　　　　　　2007年

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2007-09-20