|Table of Contents|

Review of SIMA Qian and OUYANG Xiu’s concept of inheritance(PDF)

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2017年01期
Page:
1-8
Research Field:
长安学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Review of SIMA Qian and OUYANG Xiu’s concept of inheritance
Author(s):
ZHUO Xi-hui
School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, China
Keywords:
SIMA Qian OUYANG Xiu concept of inheritance praising the good recording big events and neglecting small events
PACS:
I206
DOI:
-
Abstract:
SIMA Qian and OUYANG Xiu have innumerable links in their concepts of inheritance which are extremely famous and immortal. Centering on SIMA Qian’s Shiji and OUYANG Xiu’s New History of the Five Dynasties and other epitaph inscription proses, this paper reviewed their ideology, writing purpose, creation methods and so on. The results show that SIMA Qian and OUYANG xiu inherit the longcherished ideal of their fathers, with strong sense of duty of carrying forward the family culture and common psychology of pursuing immortality. Both of them attach great importance to the cultivation of moral character of gentlemen, and advocate the writing purpose of praising the good. They also have the literary talent ability to spread immortality for themselves and others. SIMA Qian narrates historical events and people mainly through his masterpiece Shiji, while OUYANG Xiu writes numerous outstanding epitaph inscriptions of relatives, friends, celebrities, great ministers and people with lofty ideals as well as New History of the Five Dynasties. Both of them practice the immortal concept of inheritance with their creations. Based on the principle of objectivity and faithfulness, SIMA Qian and OUYANG Xiu adopt the creation methods such as selecting big events for recording and highlighting the theme to make the values of their works immortal. SIMA Qian can faithfully state the historical facts; he describes the historical events which are informative and accurate. About rulers, he doesn’t record their imaginary events and conceal their evil events. And OUYANG Xiu’s writing is also on the premise of sticking to the facts.

References:

[1]班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,2007. [2]张宗友.左传[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,2010. [3]张燕婴.论语[M].北京:中华书局,2006. [4]洪本健.欧阳修继承了司马迁的哪些精神[C]//刘德清,欧阳明.欧阳修研究.上海:学林出版社,2008:442452. [5]裘汉康.试论欧阳修《新五代史》的写作特色[J].中山大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1986(2):8992. [6]张新科,任竞泽.褒贬祖《春秋》,叙述祖《史记》——欧阳修《新五代史》传记风格探微[J].陕西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2012,41(2):3140. [7]祝尚书.传史迁之风神,能出神而入化——论欧阳修碑志文的文学成就[C]//宋代文学探讨集.郑州:大象出版社, 2007:347361. [8]洪本健.论欧阳修碑志文的创作[J].井冈山师范学院学报:哲学社会科学,2004,25(2):513. [9]陈晓芬.论欧阳修对散文特质的阐发[J].江西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2008,41(4):3642,36. [10]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,2006. [11]李逸安.欧阳修全集[M].北京:中华书局,2001. [12]鲁迅.汉文学史纲要[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2013. [13]叶盛.水东日记[M].北京:中华书局,1997. [14]曾巩.曾巩集[M].北京:中华书局,1984. [15]孔凡礼.苏轼文集[M].北京:中华书局,1986. [16]王安石.临川先生文集[M].北京:中华书局,1959. [17]徐一夔.始丰稿校注[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2008. [18]高海夫.唐宋八大家文钞校注集评[M].西安:三秦出版社,1998. [19]陈衍.陈石遗集[M].福州:福建人民出版社,2001. [20]欧阳修.新五代史[M].北京:中华书局,1974. [21]曾枣庄,刘琳.全宋文[M].成都:巴蜀书社,1990. [22]梁启超.要籍解题及其读法[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2010. [23]蒋彤.丹棱文钞[O].丛书集成续编本. [24]沈德潜.唐宋八家文读本[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1998. [25]茅坤.唐宋八大家文钞?庐陵文钞[O].文渊阁四库全书本.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-03-07