|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]丁华,李竹蔚,马雪瑶,等.丝绸之路新疆段古驿站交旅融合开发潜力及发展模式识别[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2025,(03):64-76.
　DING Hua,LI Zhuwei,MA Xueyao,et al.Development potential and development model identification for transportation-tourism integration of ancient stations along the Xinjiang section of the Silk Road[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2025,(03):64-76.
点击复制

丝绸之路新疆段古驿站交旅融合开发潜力及发展模式识别(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
期数:
2025年03期
页码:
64-76
栏目:
交通运输·交通文化研究
出版日期:
2025-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Development potential and development model identification for transportation-tourism integration of ancient stations along the Xinjiang section of the Silk Road
文章编号:
1671-6248(2025)03-0064-13
作者:
丁华1; 2; 3; 李竹蔚1; 2; 3; 马雪瑶1; 2; 3; 代笠1; 2; 3; 苗帅1; 2; 3
(1. 长安大学 建筑学院,陕西 西安 710061; 2. 长安大学 陕西省黄河科学研究院,陕西 西安 710054; 3. 长安大学 旅游规划设计研究所,陕西 西安 710054)
Author(s):
DING Hua1; 2; 3; LI Zhuwei1; 2; 3;  MA Xueyao1; 2; 3;  DAI Li1; 2; 3;  MIAO Shuai1; 2; 3
(1. School of Architecture, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China; 2. Yellow River Scientific Research Institute of Shaanxi Province, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China; 3. Research Institute of Tourism Planning and Design, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China)
关键词:
丝绸之路;  新疆段;  古驿站;  交旅融合;  开发潜力评价
Keywords:
Silk Road;  Xinjiang section;  ancient stations;  transportation-tourism integration;  development potential evaluation
分类号:
F592
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
聚焦交通文化遗产保护利用和交旅融合发展的客观需求,以丝绸之路新疆段古驿站为研究对象,借助GIS空间分析和数理统计方法,构建交旅融合开发潜力评价体系、划定潜力类型并提出未来发展模式,以期为交旅融合的科学发展提供支撑。研究认为,新疆段218处古驿站呈“中线稠密、南北稀疏,一主多次、带状延伸”的非随机聚集空间格局; 开发潜力评分区间为[0.215,0.833],五类潜力类型的标准差椭圆总体呈西南—东北走向,与天山走廊基本一致,但空间分布存在差异; 卡方检验表明,潜力类型在线路归属(χ2=31.960,p<0.001)与驿站类型(χ2=48.114,p<0.001)中均具极显著差异,Kruskal-Wallis H非参数检验进一步揭示,3条线路间驿站资源禀赋差异极显著(p<0.001),3种驿站类型间环境适宜价值、旅游市场强度、驿站资源禀赋差异极显著(p<0.001),仅在城镇型与军事设施型间存在旅游交通联动差异(p=0.012)。基于此,提出“全域统筹-线路深化-驿站提质”的古驿站交旅融合未来发展模式,宏观上应构建“一核一带双环”的全域发展格局,基于自然断点法识别出3条优先开发线路,并针对不同线路与潜力类型古驿站制定差异化开发策略。
Abstract:
Focusing on the practical need for the protection and utilization of transportation cultural heritage and the integrated development of transportation and tourism, this study takes the ancient stations along the Xinjiang section of the Silk Road as its subject. By employing GIS spatial analysis and statistical methods, it constructs an evaluation system for development potential in transportation-tourism integration, categorizes potential types, and proposes future development models, aiming to support the scientific advancement of such integration. The study finds that the 218 ancient stations in the Xinjiang section exhibit a non-random clustered spatial pattern characterized by “dense in the central route, sparse in the north and south, with one primary and multiple secondary lines extending linearly.” Development potential scores range from [0.215, 0.833]. The standard deviation ellipses of the five potential categories generally follow a southwest—northeast orientation, aligning with the Tianshan Corridor, though spatial variations exist. Chi-square tests indicate highly significant differences in potential types across route affiliations(χ2=31.960, p<0.001)and station types(χ2=48.114, p<0.001). Kruskal-Wallis H nonparametric tests further reveal highly significant differences in resource endowments among the three routes(p<0.001), and in environmental suitability, tourism market strength, and resource endowments among the three types of stations(p<0.001). A significant difference in tourism-transportation linkage is observed only between urban-type and military facility-type stations(p=0.012). Based on these findings, the study proposes a future development model for the transportation-tourism integration of ancient stations, structured around the principles of “regional coordination-route deepening-station upgrading”. At the macro level, a comprehensive “one core, one belt, two loops” regional development pattern should be constructed. Using the natural breaks method, three priority development routes are identified, and differentiated development strategies are suggested for stations along different routes and of different potential types.

参考文献/References:

[1] 国务院关于印发“十四五”旅游业发展规划的通知(国发〔2021〕32号)[EB/OL].(2021-12-22)[2025-02-10].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2022-01/20/content_5669468.htm.
[2] 新华社.中共中央 国务院印发《交通强国建设纲要》[EB/OL].(2019-09-19)[2025-02-11].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-09/19/content_5431432.htm.
[3] 张萍.丝绸之路交通地理定位与道路网络复原研究[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):33-40.
[4] 陈程钰,崔睿玲,李靖汐,等.古今丝绸之路驿站选址的影响因素研究[J].中国储运,2023(3):95.
[5] 苏全有,陈自豪.中国邮驿史研究的回顾与反思[J].北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2010(5):58-66.
[6] 闫国疆.蒙元初期的丝绸之路与国家治理[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(2):81-87,91.
[7] 闫敏.杂剧《西游记》对元代丝绸之路文化的艺术呈现[J].四川戏剧,2022(9):27-30.
[8] 王姣娥,李涛.交通强国背景下中国交旅融合研究进展与展望[J].中国生态旅游,2022(1):1-15.
[9] 詹斌,苏健,张艳秋.高质量发展背景下交旅融合优度的评价研究[J].公路,2022(3):211-217.
[10] 王超,雷婷,孟晓莎,等.“交旅”融合下旅游经济与高速交通协调发展分析——以关中平原城市群为例[J].干旱区地理,2024(6):1015-1025.
[11] 郭向阳,穆学青,明庆忠,等.旅游地快速交通优势度与旅游流强度的空间耦合分析[J].地理研究,2019(5):1119-1135.
[12] 刘宏,李滨杉,蒲方成,等.基于数字孪生场景的久马高速公路沿线动态景观评价[J].公路,2024(9):205-213.
[13] 王兆建,郑育彬.基于有序Logit模型的交旅融合服务区出行意愿研究[J].公路,2024(5):350-355.
[14] 温美雪,余青.交旅融合道路类标准的量化分析与评估[J].公路交通科技,2024(1):195-206.
[15] 祁娟,王伯礼.“连点成线,交旅融合”让新疆交通文化遗产焕发新活力[J].交通建设与管理,2021(2):42-45.
[16] 董红玲.“文化润疆”视域下新疆古驿道历史文化遗产的保护和利用——以丝绸之路北道为例[J].昌吉学院学报,2022(4):52-58.
[17] 何吉成,王李轩,李小刚,等.生态文明视角下陕西黄河流域古代交通文化遗产的保护与开发[J].交通建设与管理,2022(4):104-107.
[18] 保继刚,楚义芳.旅游地理学[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2012.
[19] 王思超.新疆重点培育丝路古道精品线路[N].中国旅游报,2022-04-19(2).
[20] 胡宇蒙,晏波,张萍.两汉丝绸之路交通数据集[J].中国科学数据(中英文网络版),2018(3):37-44.
[21] 徐雪强,张萍.唐代丝绸之路东中段交通线路数据集(618—907年)[J].中国科学数据(中英文网络版),2018(3):23-29.
[22] 叶鹏,王曙,陈培,等.中国八批5058处重点文物保护单位空间分布数据集[J].全球变化数据学报(中英文),2023(4):362-368,465-471.
[23] 白洋,路雯,艾克拜尔·尼牙孜,等.新疆长城遗产资源旅游开发适宜性评价及发展模式[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2023(2):24-32.
[24] 赵静,谈国新.滇西北文旅融合业态开发潜力评价与谱系识别[J].经济地理,2023(11):208-219.
[25] 傅为忠,储刘平.长三角一体化视角下制造业高质量发展评价研究——基于改进的CRITIC-熵权法组合权重的TOPSIS评价模型[J].工业技术经济,2020(9):145-152.
[26] 张赫,陈阳,徐莉,等.陕南秦巴山区传统村落旅游潜力评估及开发格局构建[J].现代城市研究,2023(7):36-42.
[27] 刘逸,卢展晴,陈欣诺.避暑旅游气候舒适度模型构建与应用[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2019(3):22-31.
[28] 解智涵,刘敏,闫旭纲,等.黄河流域重要地质遗迹空间格局及地质旅游开发潜力评价[J].中国沙漠,2024(3):128-139.
[29] 王伟,张佳莹,彭东慧,等.中国区域旅游发展潜力演变格局与影响因素分析[J].干旱区地理,2019(4):953-960.
[30] 陈炜.西南地区佛教文化遗产旅游开发适宜性评价指标体系[J].社会科学家,2014(12):81-86.

相似文献/References:

[1]王永莉.丝绸之路河西走廊段赛神风俗的时空分布与文化意蕴[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2014,16(03):14.
　WANG Yong-li.Temporal spatial distribution and cultural implications of ?Sai Shen custom in Hexi Corridor of Silk Road[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2014,16(03):14.
[2]王春泉.辖域、解域与古代丝绸之路书写的新航线[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(01):124.
　WANG Chun-quan.Scope, solution domain and new courses written in the ancient Silk Road[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(03):124.
[3]喻忠杰.古代丝绸之路文学概述[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(03):132.
　YU Zhong-jie.Summary of the ancient Silk Road literature[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(03):132.
[4]朱士光.关于丝绸之路历史文化研究的几点见解[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(04):1.
　ZHU Shi-guang.Views on the history and culture of the Silk Road[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(03):1.
[5]谢雨阳.西安大唐西市产业链开发研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(02):33.
　XIE Yu-yang.Industry chain development of Xian Tang West Market[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(03):33.
[6]韩春鲜,肖爱玲.丝绸之路天山南部东段交通线路的历史变迁[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2019,21(03):69.
　HAN Chunxian,XIAO Ailing.Traffic routechange of the Silk Road in east part of southern Tianshan mountain in historic times[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2019,21(03):69.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2025-03-10
基金项目:交通运输战略规划政策项目(211434240122)
作者简介:丁华(1973-),女,四川安岳人,教授,博士研究生导师,理学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-06-30