|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]芮海田,吴群琪.哲学视域下城市交通发展的新理念[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(06):54-61.
 RUI Hai-tian,WU Qun-qi.Study on the new concept of urban traffic development from the perspective of philosophy[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(06):54-61.
点击复制

哲学视域下城市交通发展的新理念(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2017年06期
页码:
54-61
栏目:
交通运输经济与管理
出版日期:
2018-02-07

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the new concept of urban traffic development from the perspective of philosophy
作者:
芮海田吴群琪
长安大学 经济与管理学院,陕西 西安 710064
Author(s):
RUI Hai-tianWU Qun-qi
School of Economics and Management,Chang’an University,Xi’an 710064,Shaanxi,China
关键词:
城市交通交通哲学最少受惠者功利主义程序正义建构理性主义进化理性主义公共理性
Keywords:
urban traffic traffic philosophy the least beneficiaries utilitarianism procedural justice constructivist rationalism evolutionary rationalism public rationality
分类号:
U121
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
城市交通问题在一定程度上制约和障碍了城市经济发展、社会可持续发展、城市文化繁荣,然而当前的研究成果对于解决中国城市交通中存在的技术异化问题存在一定的局限性。从哲学角度出发,提出了当下城市交通发展所需的新理念:关注最少受惠者出行利益,城市交通发展应当是符合每一位城市居民的出行利益,尤其是城市中弱势或困难个人和群体的出行利益,即最少受惠者的利益;坚持程序正义原则,现实生活中大家的关注点已经由实体正义过渡到程序正义,城市交通中任何一项制度和规范的制定、执行必须符合程序正义;坚持以建构主义为前提的进化理性主义,建构理性主义则处于优先地位,进化理性主义应该占据主要地位;坚持公共理性原则,通过合理的制度供给、合程序的制度运行,达到个体理性与公共理性相统一的目标。
Abstract:
To a certain extent, Urban traffic problems have restricted and hindered urbaneconomic development, social sustainable development and urban cultural prosperity. However, the current research achievements have some limitations to solve the problem of technology alienation existing inurban traffic in China. From the perspective of philosophy, the new concept that is needed in the current development of urban traffic was put forward: Focusing on the travel benefits of the leastbeneficiaries, the development of urban traffic should be in line with the travel benefits of each urban resident, especially the travel benefits of the disadvantaged individuals and groups in urban areas, that is, the interests of the least beneficiaries; insisting on the principle of procedural justice, everyone’s concerns in real life has transformed from substantive justice to procedural justice, the formulation and implementation of any systems and norms in urban traffic must comply with procedural justice; insisting on evolutionary rationalism that takes constructivism as a prerequisite, constructivist rationalism is a priority, and evolutionary rationalism should occupy the main position; adhering to the principle of public rationality, the goal on the unification of individual rationality and public rationality is achieved through a reasonable system of supply and procedural system of operation.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]宋顺锋,王家庭.中国交通拥挤收费的理论分析、经验借鉴与初步构想[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2014,16(04):22.
 SONG Shun-feng,WANG Jia-ting.Theoretical analysis, experience reference and preliminary conception of traffic congestion pricing in China[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2014,16(06):22.
[2]李都厚,赵志宏.对城市交通需求管理的理论分析与实现对策[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2005,7(04):10.
 LI Du-hou,ZHAO Zhi-hong.Theoretical analysis and realizing measures for urban TDM[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2005,7(06):10.
[3]石琼,吴群琪.拥挤收费为主导缓解城市交通 拥挤可行性研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2004,6(03):38.
 SHI Qiong,WU Qun-qi.Feasibility research on congestion pricing for our urban traffic congestion[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2004,6(06):38.
[4]王光荣.共享单车发展问题系统探究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):30.
 Wang Guang-rong. Systematic research on Bicycle-sharing development[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(06):30.
[5]卢文捷.共享单车运营立法规制管窥[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(04):39.
 LU Wen-jie.Restriction of legislative regulation of the operation of bicycle sharing[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(06):39.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
中央高校基本科研业务费(人文社科)专项资金项目(2014G6503015)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-02-07