|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]艾伦·海玛特.话语诠释学:跨多学科的探索[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(03):85-95.
 Allen Amrollah Hemmat.Hermeneutics of discourse:a multidisciplinary exploration of Elements for constructive communication[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):85-95.
点击复制

话语诠释学:跨多学科的探索(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
85-95
栏目:
新闻传播学
出版日期:
2017-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Hermeneutics of discourse:a multidisciplinary exploration of Elements for constructive communication
文章编号:
1671-6248(2017)03-0085-11
作者:
艾伦·海玛特
北京大学 西亚系
Author(s):
Allen Amrollah Hemmat
Department of West Asian, Peking University
关键词:
伽达默尔海德格尔哈贝马期话语分析诠释学学术话语建设性话语
Keywords:
Hans-Georg Gadamer Heidegger Habermas discourse analysis hermeneutics academic discourse constructive discourse
分类号:
B516
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
话语在其最广泛的意义上包括了交流的不同层面,从人际到国际,甚至不同文明间的对话。当代世界的不同文明之间迫切需要建设性的对话和话语。为探寻那些可以引向积极和建设性话语的哲学与文化假设,探索促进富有建设性和积极性的话语原则,将当代哲学、与话语相关的思想及其实践应用结合起来分析,并对某些不同学科领域里的理论假设及其实际影响做了一个简要回顾。分析认为,后结构主义的传播方式倾向于将语言看成是非此即彼,由支配关系构成的话语,或是有着几乎无限的模糊性,可提供机会通过颠覆意义来抵抗被支配;诸如伽达默尔和哈贝马斯所提出的诠释学方法提供了达成相互理解、建立共识以及团结的途径。
Abstract:
Discourse in its broadest meaning encompasses various levels of communication, from interpersonal to international and even to the dialogue between different civilizations. It’s urgent to need constructive dialogue and discourse between different civilizations in contemporary world. To explore the philosophical and cultural assumptions that can lead to positive and constructive discourse, and the constructive and positive discourse principles, this paper analyzed contemporary philosophy, the ideas related to discourse based on practical application, and reviewed the theoretical assumptions of different disciplines and their influence. The results show that the communication approaches of poststructuralist tend to regard language as either this or that in terms of discourse constituted by relations of domination, or in terms of a virtually unlimited ambiguity that offers opportunities to resist domination mainly through subversion of meaning. Hermeneutic approaches such as those offered by Gadamer and Habermas provide paths to mutual understanding, consensus building, and solidarity.

参考文献/References:

[1]Barker C.Cultural studies theory and practice[M].London:Sage Publications,2000.
[2]Michelfelder D P,Palmer R E.Dialogue and deconstruction,the GadamerDerrida encounter[M].New York:State University of New York Press,1989.
[3]Gadamer H G.Truth and method[M].New York:Continuum,2006.
[4]Ess C. The political computer: democracy, CMS, and Habermas[C]//Ess C.Philosophical perspectives on computer mediated communication.Albany:State University of New York Press,1996:197-230.
[5]Finlayson J G.Habermas:a very short introduction[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005.
[6]Bahabha H K.The location of culture[M].New York:Routledge,2004.
[7]Huntington S P.The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order[M].New York:Simon and Schuster,1996.
[8]Barker C.Cultural studies theory and practice[M].London:Sage Publications.2000.
[9]Miller A I.Insights of genius, imagery and creativity in sciences and art[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press,2000.
[10]董宏乐.科学语篇的隐喻性[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2005.
[11]Zohar D.The quantum self human nature and consciousness defined by new physics[M].New York:Morrrow,1989.
[12]Gardner P.Hermeneutics,history and memory[M].New York:Routledge,2010.
[13]Becker A L.Beyond translation essays toward a modern philosophy[M].Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press,2000.
[14]Burke K.Permanence and change:an anatomy of purpose[M].Berkeley and Los Angles:University of California Press,1984.
[15]Winters J.Communicative interaction:relating habermasian universalism to Baha’i consultation[D].Toronto:University of Toronto,1996.
[16]MuellerVollmer K.The hermeneutics reader:texts of the German tradition from the Enlightenment to the present[M].New York:Continuum Publishing,1990.
[17]Jon S G.Towards wave rhetoric for scholarly communication in human sciences[J].Advances in the History of Rhetoric,2011,14(2):207-219.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
艾伦·海玛特(1946-),男,北京大学西亚系访问学者、客座教授,美国南佛罗里达大学传播学博士
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-11