|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]史澎海. 二战时期美国对日本的心理战研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):138-146.
　SHI Peng-hai. Studies of the U.S. psychological warfare on Japan during World War II[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):138-146.
点击复制

 二战时期美国对日本的心理战研究(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
138-146
栏目:
心理学
出版日期:
2017-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Studies of the U.S. psychological warfare on Japan during World War II
文章编号:
1671-6248(2017)02-0138-09
作者:
 史澎海
 长安大学 外国语学院，陕西 西安 710065
Author(s):
 SHI Peng-hai
 School of Foreign Languages, Chang’an University Xi’an 710065, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
 ; 二战时期; 心理战; “白色”宣传; 心理威慑; 心理宣传
Keywords:
 ; the Second World War;  the U.S.;  psychological warfare;  Japan
分类号:
K721.54
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 太平洋战争爆发后，以美军为首的盟国军队用心理战从精神层面打击日军问题，在历史唯物主义的指导下，借助历史学以及其他学科的研究理论和方法，对二战时期美国对日本的心理战战略计划、心理战手段、心理战的成绩及特点等进行研究。研究认为，日本士兵在接受军国主义教育后有“效忠天皇”“皇军不可战胜”等信念，狂热信奉“进功精神”和“武士道”精神；对此，美国在大战略背景下确定了对日本心理战的目标是以揭露法西斯主义的本质和危害性为核心，使日本士兵和民众相信，日本政府发动的侵略战争注定要失败的，并相信美国的宣战和胜利将给日本带来民主自由，同时维护日本天皇的尊严，将发动战争的罪行归于日本军国主义政府，并尽可能减少日本士兵和民众遭受不必要的生命和财产损失；心理战具体的措施有正面的“白色”宣传，一是对日本军队进行广播宣传或阵前喊话，二是向日本军队占领的岛屿或前沿阵地投放传单，还有讲假话的“黑色”或“灰色”宣传，其基本手法是制造和传播假消息和假情报来扰乱日军士兵的心理，再利用日本战俘向原先部队宣传美军优待俘虏政策，向美国投降是“名誉停战”等；为了让心理战术的效果更明显，美军将心理战行为与军事行为相互配合，用空袭和投放原子弹等对日军士兵造成心理威慑，用真假情报信息迷惑日军士兵，使得日军士兵士气低落，抵抗意志逐渐减弱，“跳蛙”战术和心理战攻势节节胜利，心理战在打败日本法西斯战争中发挥了“第四种战争”的重要作用。
Abstract:
 After the outbreak of the Pacific War, allied forces headed by the U.S attacked Japanese troops with psychological warfare. Guided by historical materialism as well as research theories and methods of history and other disciplines, this paper studied the psychological strategic planning, means, and characteristics of the U.S. during World War II. The results show that Japanese soldiers have the beliefs of loyalty to the Emperor of Japan and imperial army being undefeatable after receiving militarism education, who believe in offensive spirit and Bushido spirit. In this case, the U.S. determined the target of psychological warfare on Japan, which is to reveal the essence and risks of Fascism, trying to make Japan soldiers and masses think that aggressive war started by Japanese government is doomed to fail and that the war-declaration and victory of the U.S. would bring democracy and freedom for Japan. In addition, they maintain the respect of the Emperor of Japan, blame the guilt of starting the War to Japanese militarism government, and try to reduce unnecessary lives and property losses for Japanese troops and masses. The specific measures of psychological warfare have the characteristic of positive “White” propaganda, which are broadcasting or yelling at Japanese troops and throwing leaflets in the island occupied by Japanese troops or in front of camp. It also contains “Black” or “Grey” propaganda, producing and spreading false news and false information to disturb Japanese soldiers’ psychological state and then making use of Japanese prisoners of war to promote the policy of giving special treatment to prisoners of war. In order to give full play of psychological warfare on Japan, the U.S. troops combined psychological warfare and military action together, making psychological threat to Japanese soldiers by means of air attack and atomic bomb and using true and false information to perplex Japanese soldiers, which make Japanese soldiers in a low morale and weaken their resistance will. The strategy of Jumping Frogs and psychological warfare go from victory to victory. In a word, psychological warfare plays a very important role of the fourth kind of war in the war of defeating the Japanese fascist.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]孙董霞.周人之“德”为“明德”论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(02):1.
　SUN Dong xia.Research on “light De” of Zhou — the differences between the Shang’s “De” and Zhou’s “De”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(02):1.
[2]李江辉.刘师培的黄帝明堂研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):12.
　LI Jiang-hui.LIU Shipei’s research on Huang Emperors Mingtang classi[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(02):12.
[3]刘固盛.中国传统文化中的自由精神与现代启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):16.
　LIU Gu-sheng.Spirit of freedom and modern enlightenment in Chinese traditional culture[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(02):16.
[4]许门友. 文化自信的学理与增强路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):13.
　XU Men-you.Several issues on cultural self-confidence[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):13.
[5]潘小慧.“安”可否作为儒家伦理实践的判准？——从“女安则为之”谈起[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):7.
　Pan Xiaohui.Can “Feeling at ease” be regarded as Confucian ethical practice?——from the perspective of “doing it with feeling at ease”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):7.
[6]周建高. 共享单车爆棚与中国城市空间结构问题[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):20.
　ZHOU Jian-gao.The boom of sharing bicycles and Chinese urban spatial structure[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):20.
[7]王光荣.共享单车发展问题系统探究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):30.
　Wang Guang-rong. Systematic research on Bicycle-sharing development[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):30.
[8]丁诺舟. 日本共享单车的历史、现状与启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):36.
　Ding Nuozhou. History, current situation and enlightenment of Japanese bicycle-sharing[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):36.
[9]杜向民,赵成威. 社会转型期公共部门行政伦理失范及其矫正路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):44.
　DU Xiang-min,ZHAO Cheng-wei. Administrative ethical anomie and rectification approach of public sectors in social transformation period[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):44.
[10]王平,孙豪,余文砚. 微信投票乱局与治道变革[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):50.
　WANG Ping,SUN Hao,YU Wen-yan. WeChat voting chaos and governance transform[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):50.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2017-01-25
基金项目：国家社会科学研究基金项目（15BSS022）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（人文社科）项目（310813160639）
作者简介：史澎海（1962-），男，陕西咸阳人，教授，硕士研究生导师，历史学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-23