|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈寰琦,何宇航.《中欧全面投资协定》数字金融核心规则解析 ——基于和RCEP/CETA比较[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2021,23(04):67-75.
　CHEN Huanqi,HE Yuhang.Analysis on the core rules of digital finance in the China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment:based on the comparison with RCEP/CETA[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2021,23(04):67-75.
点击复制

《中欧全面投资协定》数字金融核心规则解析 ——基于和RCEP/CETA比较(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
67-75
栏目:
国际经济与贸易
出版日期:
2021-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on the core rules of digital finance in the China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment:based on the comparison with RCEP/CETA
文章编号:
1671-6248(2021)04-0067-09
作者:
陈寰琦; 何宇航
(广东外语外贸大学 经济贸易学院,广东 广州 510006)
Author(s):
CHEN Huanqi;  HE Yuhang
(School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China)
关键词:
《中欧全面投资协定》(CAI);  《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP);  《综合性经济贸易协议》(CETA);  数字金融;  新金融服务;  市场准入;  正面清单;  数据监管
Keywords:
China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment(CAI);  Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP);  Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement(CETA);  digital finance;  new financial service;  market access;  positive list;  data supervision
分类号:
F744
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《中欧全面投资协定》(CAI)给中欧的金融服务投资带来了机遇,聚焦于数字金融领域,通过比对CAI与中欧和第三方经济体签订的协议(包括RCEP和CETA),分析CAI数字金融核心规则的变化与未来走向。研究认为,CAI具有的显著特征,一是承诺内容与既有RTAs呈现相互交错的关系; 二是欧盟对金融数据跨境流通持审慎态度,而中国基于正面清单的方式对金融数据流通服务作出市场准入承诺; 三是市场准入承诺超过中国既有的自主开放水平; 四是设置较全面且详细的金融安全监管内容。CAI的承诺仍存在不少保留,未来中欧就金融贸易规则构建进程中,双方在完善数据监管维护个人隐私安全方面需要继续协商和取得共识; 欧盟需要进一步提升对数据流通服务的开放水平,以及精确金融监管“审慎措施”。
Abstract:
The China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment(CAI)has brought many opportunities for China and EU's financial services investment. Focusing on the field of digital finance, this paper analyzes the changes in and future trends of the core CAI digital finance rules based on the comparison of CAI with the agreements signed between China, EU and third parties(including RCEP and CETA). This paper argues that the CAI has distinctive characteristics. First, the rules of CAI overlap with the committed content in the existing RTAs. Second, EU is cautious about the cross-border circulation of financial data, while China has made market access commitments for financial data circulation services based on a positive list. Third, the market access commitments have exceeded China's existing level of openness. Fourth, a more comprehensive and detailed financial security supervision content has been set up. There are still many reservations to the commitments of CAI. In the future construction process of the financial trade rules between China and EU, both parties should continue to negotiate and achieve consensus in terms of improving data supervision and maintaining personal privacy and security, and EU needs to further enhance the openness level of data circulation services and refine their "cautious measures" towards financial supervision.

参考文献/References:

[1] EC.Commission publishes market access offers of the EU-China investment agreement[EB/OL].(2021-03-12)[2021-03-14].https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=2253.
[2]温树英.金融服务贸易国际法律规制的新发展与启示——以TPP/CPTPP和USMCA为视角[J].国际经济法学刊,2019(3):72-89.
[3]杨幸幸.新一代FTAs中金融服务贸易规则研究[D].北京:对外经济贸易大学,2018.
[4]James M.Rowshankish K K.Addressing the impact of data location regulation in financial servicest[EB/OL].(2015-05-01)[2021-03-14].https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/no14_web_0.pdf.
[5]Cantore C M."Parallel convergences" in free trade agreements on financial services:select issues[C]//Hoffmann R T,Krajewski M.Coherence and Divergence in Services Trade Law.Cham:Springer,2020:193-218.
[6]韩立余.全球金融危机后国际贸易制度的完善与中国的对策[J].法学家,2010(2):148-157,180.
[7]王海峰,程维荣,孙大伟,等.国际贸易投资规则重构趋势下的上海地方法制建设[C]//上海市法学会.《上海法学研究》集刊(2019年第4卷).上海:上海市法学会,2019:206-225.
[8]马兰.中国金融业深化对外开放的负面清单机制研究——基于CPTPP和GATS的比较分析[J].金融监管研究,2019(9):99-114.
[9]王远志.我国银行金融数据跨境流动的法律规制[J].金融监管研究,2020(1):51-65.

相似文献/References:

[1]余淼杰,郭兰滨.《中欧全面投资协定》:基础、前景和挑战[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2021,23(04):48.
　YU Miaojie,GUO Lanbin.China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment:basis, prospects and challenges[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2021,23(04):48.
[2]韩永辉,麦靖华,张帆.RCEP和中国参与全球经济治理体系改革:困境、机遇与路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2021,23(05):31.
　HAN Yonghui,MAI Jinghua,ZHANG Fan.RCEP and China's participation in the reform of global economic governance system: plight, opportunities and paths[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2021,23(04):31.
[3]周方银,马宋若文.“印太经济框架”的内涵、走向及其面临的制约[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2023,25(01):88.
　ZHOU Fangyin,MA Songruowen.Connotation, direction and constraints of the “Indo-Pacific Economic Framework”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2023,25(04):88.
[4]施锦芳,隋霄.日本数字贸易规则制定方式、模板应用及启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2023,25(06):18.
　SHI Jinfang,SUI Xiao.Methods, template application and implications of Japan's formulation of digital trade rules[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2023,25(04):18.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-03-14
基金项目:广州市哲学社会科学发展“十四五”规划2021年度课题项目(2021GZQN01); 广东外语外贸大学引进人才科研启动项目(299-X5221071)
作者简介:陈寰琦(1987-),女,广东广州人,讲师,硕士研究生导师,经济学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-09-20