|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈峰,杨晓,陈晓江. 科研评价体系中学术论文评价实证分析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):58-63.
　CHEN Feng,CHEN Xiao jiang,YANG Xiao. An Empirical Study on Appraisal of the Academic Paper in Scientific Research Evaluation System[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):58-63.
点击复制

 科研评价体系中学术论文评价实证分析(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
58-63
栏目:
经济与管理
出版日期:
2017-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 An Empirical Study on Appraisal of the Academic Paper in Scientific Research Evaluation System
文章编号:
1671-6248(2017)02-0058-06
作者:
 陈峰1; 杨晓2; 陈晓江3
 1.西北大学科技处，陕西西安710127；2.西北大学经济管理学院科技处，陕西西安710127；3.西北大学信息学院科技处，陕西西安710127
Author(s):
 CHEN Feng1;  CHEN Xiaojiang2;  YANG Xiao3
 Northwest University
关键词:
 ; 科研评价; 顶级会议论文; SCI期刊论文; 计算机学科
Keywords:
 ; Research Evaluation;  Top Conferences’Papers;  SCI Journal papers;  Computer Science
分类号:
G321
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 针对当前科研评价体系中中对学术论文质量的评价存在局限性的问题，以计算机学科中的学术论文评价为实证，以某大学的科研评价标准体系与考核指标为案例，地学术论文评价的相关问题进行研究。研究认为，如何定位会议论文和SCI期刊论文在科研评价体系中的价值与定位，能否坚持正确导向是科研管理评价体系面临的主要问题；在计算机学科中，国际上大部分的标志性成果都会在顶级会议上发表论文，但中国的科研评价体系仍以SCI期刊论文为主，中国学者在国际计算机学会的权威会议上参与与发文量均较低；中国的科研评价体系中应重视顶级会议论文的重要性，平衡不同评价指标的权重，平衡不同学科领域之间的差异，提高会议论文认定的等级，发挥评价体系的导向作用，制定科学的评价指标，完善科研评价管理制度；某高校制定了分学科科研评价标准体系和差异化的考核指标，依据不同的专业领域拟定了同行专家评价认可的期刊与会议列表，规范了期刊文章和会议文章的量化指标来综合衡量学术论文的学术和文献价值，在学术科研的国际化方面取得了显著成绩。
Abstract:
 To solve the problem that there are certain limitations to the appraisal of the academic paper in scientific research evaluation system, this paper took the appraisal of academic papers concerned with computer science as example and chose one university’s scientific research evaluation criteria and indicators for performance appraisal as case to study relevant issues of academic papers appraisal. The results show that the key point of determining the value and orientation of top conference papers and SCI journal papers lies in whether to insist on correct guidance in scientific management evaluation system. In computer science, most symbolic achievements are published on the papers of international top conferences while Chinese scientific research evaluation system still puts focus on SCI journal papers, which leads to the low participation and quality of Chinese scholars’ published papers at international computer science conferences. It puts forward some suggestions, such as top conference papers should be stressed in Chinese scientific research evaluation system, the weight of different evaluation indicators should be balanced, the difference between different disciplines should be considered, quality evaluation grade of conference papers should be raised, the guidance role of evaluation system should be played, a new scientific evaluation indicators should be formulated, and the management system of scientific research evaluation should be improved. A university formulated a scientific research evaluation system which considered the difference of disciplines and specified different evaluation indicators. It also listed the journals and conferences for different disciplines, which are recognized by experts and professionals, and gave specification for quantitative indicators of journal papers and conference papers to comprehensively determine the academic and documentary values of academic papers, which made great achievements in the internationalization of academic research.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]孙董霞.周人之“德”为“明德”论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(02):1.
　SUN Dong xia.Research on “light De” of Zhou — the differences between the Shang’s “De” and Zhou’s “De”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(02):1.
[2]李江辉.刘师培的黄帝明堂研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):12.
　LI Jiang-hui.LIU Shipei’s research on Huang Emperors Mingtang classi[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(02):12.
[3]刘固盛.中国传统文化中的自由精神与现代启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):16.
　LIU Gu-sheng.Spirit of freedom and modern enlightenment in Chinese traditional culture[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(02):16.
[4]许门友. 文化自信的学理与增强路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):13.
　XU Men-you.Several issues on cultural self-confidence[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):13.
[5]潘小慧.“安”可否作为儒家伦理实践的判准？——从“女安则为之”谈起[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):7.
　Pan Xiaohui.Can “Feeling at ease” be regarded as Confucian ethical practice?——from the perspective of “doing it with feeling at ease”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):7.
[6]周建高. 共享单车爆棚与中国城市空间结构问题[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):20.
　ZHOU Jian-gao.The boom of sharing bicycles and Chinese urban spatial structure[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):20.
[7]王光荣.共享单车发展问题系统探究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):30.
　Wang Guang-rong. Systematic research on Bicycle-sharing development[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):30.
[8]丁诺舟. 日本共享单车的历史、现状与启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):36.
　Ding Nuozhou. History, current situation and enlightenment of Japanese bicycle-sharing[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):36.
[9]杜向民,赵成威. 社会转型期公共部门行政伦理失范及其矫正路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):44.
　DU Xiang-min,ZHAO Cheng-wei. Administrative ethical anomie and rectification approach of public sectors in social transformation period[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):44.
[10]王平,孙豪,余文砚. 微信投票乱局与治道变革[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):50.
　WANG Ping,SUN Hao,YU Wen-yan. WeChat voting chaos and governance transform[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):50.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 收稿日期：2017-01-07
基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目（61373177）；陕西省科技计划（自然基金）项目（2012JQ8049）
作者简介：陈峰（1978-），男，安徽天长人，工学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-23