|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]苏礼和.公共行政道德化：新公共行政社会公平观的现代价值[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(04):95-100.
　SU Li-he.Public administration moralization: modern value of social equality in the new public administration[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(04):95-100.
点击复制

公共行政道德化：新公共行政社会公平观的现代价值(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2015年04期
页码:
95-100
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2015-10-19

文章信息/Info

Title:
Public administration moralization: modern value of social equality in the new public administration
文章编号:
1671-6248(2015)04-0095-06
作者:
苏礼和1; 2
1.闽江学院法律系，福建福州350121；2.福建师范大学马克思主义学院，福建福州350117
Author(s):
SU Li-he1; 2
1.Department of Law， Minjiang University， Fuzhou 350121, Fujian, China; 2.School of Marxism, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, Fujian, China
关键词:
效率; 经济; 社会公平; 公共行政道德化; 公共行政
Keywords:
efficiency;  economy;  social equality;  public administration moralization;  public administration
分类号:
D523
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以政治与行政二分法和官僚制为基础的传统公共行政以效率和经济为核心价值。新公共行政学派强烈批判了传统公共行政的效率和经济观，认为必须把社会公平引入公共行政中去，并作为其基石和核心，才能体现公共行政的精神。公共行政道德化是社会公平的现代启示，它包括公共行政体制的道德化和行政人员的道德化两个维度，包括从行政人到公共人、从顾客到公民、从管理到服务、追求公共性4个基本意涵。
Abstract:
The traditional public administration takes the efficiency and economy as its the core value based on the dichotomy of politic administration and the bureaucracy. The new school of public administration strongly criticizes the theory of efficiency and economy in the traditional public administration, emphasizes the importance of introducing the social equality to public administration， and takes social equality as its cornerstone and core, Only then it can reflect the spirit of public administration. Public administration moralization is the modern enlightenment of social equality, including public administration system moralization and administrative personnel moralization with its four basic contents containing from administration person to the public person, from the customer to the citizen, from management to service, the pursuit of publicity.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]罗群,朱强.２０世纪以来“南方丝绸之路”研究述评[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(03):121.
　LUO Qun,ZHU Qiang.Research review of “Southern Silk Road” since the 20th century[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(04):121.
[2]强以华.经济伦理与分配正义[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(04):101.
　QIANG Yi-hua.Economic ethics and distributive justice[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(04):101.
[3]王宇.试论效率优先兼顾公平原则[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2002,4(02):34.
　WANG Yu.Study on the Priority in Efficiency and Gire Consideration to Fair Principle[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2002,4(04):34.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2014-11-29 作者简介：苏礼和（1985-），男，福建闽清人，讲师，法学博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-10-19