|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]何红娟.逻辑的历史与现实的历史 ——波普尔与库恩科学观之比较[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(02):86-89.
　HE Hong-juan.Logical history and reality history —comparative analysis of Popper and Kuhn scientific view[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(02):86-89.
点击复制

逻辑的历史与现实的历史 ——波普尔与库恩科学观之比较(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2013年02期
页码:
86-89
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2013-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Logical history and reality history —comparative analysis of Popper and Kuhn scientific view
作者:
何红娟
长安大学 材料科学与工程学院,陕西 西安 710061
Author(s):
HE Hong-juan
School of Material Science and Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
波普尔;  库恩;  证伪;  范式
Keywords:
Popper;  Kuhn;  falsfication;  paradigm
分类号:
N02
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
关于科学知识的增长,波普尔从静态的论证逻辑扩展到动态的发现逻辑之内,但把它限制在逻辑的范围之内,他的科学发展图式是一个纯粹逻辑的抽象形态,是科学发展的理性模型,这是抽象了一切人类感情的理性的自我展开,是一个波普尔自称没有认识主体的认识过程。库恩的历史学派在对科学史的深入介入后,从范式和不可通约性等核心概念出发,在把科学分为常规科学和革命科学的阶段性基础上,刻画并描述了科学发展的真实历史性过程,还科学真实面目,以现实的历史代替抽象的逻辑的历史。
Abstract:
About the scientific knowledge growth, Popper expands from static demonstration logic to dynamic discovery logic, but confines it within logic range. His science development schema is a pure and logic abstract shape. Which is a rational model of science development. This is an abstract self-expansion of reason of emotion for human beings, and Popper claims it's a process of cognition without subject. Kuhn's historical school proceeds from normal form and incommensurability key concept after getting involved thoroughly with history of science. Based on division of regular science and revolution science, it portrays and describes the true historical course of science development, returns the true appearance of science, logic history that is abstract is substituted by realistic history.

参考文献/References:

[1] 佟 立.西方后现代主义哲学思潮研究[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2003.
[2]K.R.波珀.科学发现的逻辑[M].查汝强,邱仁宗,译.北京:科学出版社,1986.
[3]托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构[M].金吾伦,胡新和,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[4]波普尔.猜想与反驳[M].傅季重,纪树立,周昌忠,等,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1986.
[5]Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolution[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1962.
[6]波普尔.科学知识进化论[M].纪树立,译.北京:三联书店,1992.

相似文献/References:

[1]曾宪平,陈 宇.知识理性、自由与极权主义的批判: 波普尔与哈耶克之比较[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2010,12(04):77.
　ZENG Xian-ping,CHEN Yu.Cognitive reason,freedom and critique of totalitarianism: comparison of Hayek and Popper's ideology[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2010,12(02):77.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2012-12-28 作者简介:何红娟(1978-),女,陕西渭南人,讲师。
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-06-20