|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周晓唯,李莉,杨爽.中国民事诉讼费用负担制度的法经济学思考[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(01):72-75，94.
　ZHOU Xiao-wei,LI Li,YANG Shuang.Some Thought of Law and Economics on Measures to Perfect the Civil Legal Cost System[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(01):72-75，94.
点击复制

中国民事诉讼费用负担制度的法经济学思考 (PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第8卷
期数:
2006年01期
页码:
72-75，94
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2006-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Some Thought of Law and Economics on Measures to Perfect the Civil Legal Cost System
作者:
周晓唯1; 李莉2; 3; 杨爽1
1.陕西师范大学国际商学院,陕西西安　710062; 2.西北大学法学院,陕西西安　710069; 3.西北工业大学365研究所,陕西西安　710072
Author(s):
ZHOU Xiao-wei1;  LI Li2; 3;  YANG Shuang1
1. School of International Businesses, Shaanxi Normal University, Xian 710062, Shaanxi, China; 2. School of Law, Northwest University, Xian 710069, Shaanxi, China; 3. 365 Institute, Northwest Polytechnical University, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
法学; 民事诉讼; 诉讼费用; 审判成本; 法经济学; 救济渠道
Keywords:
science of law;  civil procedure;  legal cost;  judgment cost;  law and economics;  relief channel
分类号:
D925. 1
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
当事人之间诉讼费用负担和国家对审判成本负担的划分影响着当事人诉讼行为的选择。 目前中国民事诉讼费用负担制度存在着制度供给不足、缺少救济措施、权利分布不均衡和国家承担 公共成本太低等问题,因此健全中国民事诉讼费用负担制度,制定可行的救济措施,并对民事诉讼 费用负担判决实行监督,实施法院独立预算等措施,才是解决民事诉讼费用负担问题的根本途径。
Abstract:
How much legal cost should the litigants undertake and how much legal cost should the government undertake are the two important factors, which weigh greatly on two parties when they are deciding whether to take civil procedure. In order to perfect the legal cost system, it is necessary to formulate effective relief channels, build a thorough supervisory system and carry out independent financial budget.

参考文献/References:

[1]　李祖军,蔡维力.民事诉讼法学[M].重庆:重庆大学出 版社,2003.
[2]　杨松才.民事诉讼法教程[M].北京:中国财政经济出 版社,1999.
[3]　方流芳.民事诉讼收费考[J].中国社会科学,1999,20 (3):130-144.
[4]　廖永安,王　春.论我国民事诉讼费用负担的立法缺陷 与完善[J].湘潭大学学报:社会科学版,2003,27(3): 61-65.
[5]　罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦.法和经济学[M].施少 华,姜建强,译.上海:上海三联出版社,2002.
[6]　廖永安.论民事诉讼费用的性质与征收依据[J].政法 论坛,2003,21(5):63-70.

相似文献/References:

[1]贺桂华.仲裁协议及其形式探析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(03):65.
　HE Gui-hua.Discussion on arbitration agreement and its forms[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(01):65.
[2]王延川,马宁.交易风险的分配与外观主义法理[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(03):69.
　WANG Yan-chuan,MA Ning.Assignment of exchange risk and rechtsscheintheorie jurisprudence[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(01):69.
[3]郑颖慧.朱熹的司法思想与和谐社会[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(03):73.
　ZHENG Ying-hui.ZHU Xis judicial thinking and harmonious society[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(01):73.
[4]刘庆法,贺秀风.“乘人之危”行为的构成要件及效力[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(01):76.
　LIU Qing-fa,HE Xiu-feng.Elements and Their Potency for the Behavior Taking Advantage of Somebodys Precarious Position[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(01):76.
[5]贺宏斌,蔚丽.交通产业知识产权保护[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(03):70.
　HE Hong-bin,YU Li.Protection for intellectual property right in transportation industry[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(01):70.
[6]杨心明,徐莹.行政许可与城市建设[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(03):74.
　YANG Xin-ming,XU Ying.Administrative license and urban construction[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(01):74.
[7]申萍,张宏民,张莉.市场经济对合同自由原则的限制[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(03):78.
　SHEN Ping,ZHANG Hong-min,ZHANG Li.Restriction on free principle of the contract in modern market economy[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(01):78.
[8]陶信平.物业经营权的法律属性和担保方式[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2006,8(04):82.
　TAO Xin-ping.Legal attributes and guarantee mode of property management right[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2006,8(01):82.
[9]滕丽.中国高等法学教育改革探索[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2005,7(02):92.
　TENG Li.Research on higher law education reformation in China[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2005,7(01):92.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2005-09-14
基金项目:陕西师范大学重点科研课题(05XJZ19)
作者简介:周晓唯(1963-),男,四川乐山人,教授,经济学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2006-03-20