|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]余淼杰,金洋,刘亚琳.中美贸易摩擦的缘起与对策——一个文献综述[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(05):42-47.
　YU Miaojie,JIN Yang,LIU Yalin.Origin and countermeasure for SinoUS trade friction——a literature review[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(05):42-47.
点击复制

中美贸易摩擦的缘起与对策——一个文献综述
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
42-47
栏目:
经济学
出版日期:
2018-11-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Origin and countermeasure for SinoUS trade friction——a literature review
文章编号:
1671-6248(2018)05-0042-06
作者:
余淼杰; 金洋; 刘亚琳
北京大学 国家发展研究院中国经济研究中心，北京100871
Author(s):
YU Miaojie;  JIN Yang;  LIU Yalin
China Center for Economic Research & National School of Development， Peking University， Beijing 100871， China
关键词:
贸易摩擦; 贸易保护; 就业; 收入分配; 全球化
Keywords:
trade friction;  trade protection;  employment;  income distribution;  globalization
分类号:
F752.7；F757.12
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
结合中美贸易摩擦的新形势，回顾2018年以来该领域最前沿的研究成果，着重分析美国民粹主义思想的兴起、中美贸易对两国劳动力市场冲击以及中美两国政策的选择。研究结果显示，中美贸易对美国劳动力市场冲击是多维度和多方面的，美国制造业就业的下降不能只归咎于中美贸易；相比于提高税率、挑起贸易争端的保护主义政策，美国政府更合理的政策是从国内的收入分配机制出发，构建更合理的税收体系；大规模的贸易保护主义措施对美国只会造成更大的福利损失；中国政府在合理选择应对策略的前提下，完全能够有效降低此次贸易摩擦带来的负面影响。
Abstract:
This article reviews the most advanced research results in terms of SinoUS trade friction since the beginning of 2018 combining uptodate conditions， with a focus on the emerging trend of populism in US， the impact of trade war on the labor markets in both countries as well as policy decisions of both countries. The result shows that the impact of SinoUS trade on American labor market is multidimensional and manifested in various aspects. The decline of employment rate in American manufacturing industry cannot be entirely attributed to trade with China. Compared with trade protectionism policies that raise tax rate and cause trade war， it is more sensible for the US government to take actions from improving its income distribution regime and build a better structured tax system. The largescale trade protection measures will only make US lose more benefits. The Chinese government is capable of effectively easing the negative effects of the trade war when choosing the right coping strategies.

参考文献/References:

［1］余淼杰.余淼杰谈中美贸易——全球经贸新格局下的大国博弈［M］.北京：北京大学出版社，2018.
［2］Pastor L，Veronesi P. Inequality aversion， populism， and the backlash against globalization ［EB/OL］.（2018-08-01）［2018-08-28］.http://www.nber.org/papers/w24900.pdf.
［3］Autor D， Dorn D， Hanson G， et al. Importing political polarization? the electoral consequences of rising trade exposure［EB/OL］.（2016-09-01）［2018-08-28］.http://www.nber.org/papers/w22637.pdf.
［4］Costinot A， RodríguezClare A. The US gains from trade: valuation using the demand for foreign factor services［J］. Cepr Discussion Papers， 2018， 32(2):3-24.
［5］Feenstra R C. Alternative sources of the gains from international trade: variety， creative destruction， and markups［J］. Journal of Economic Perspectives， 2018， 32(2):25-46.
［6］Autor D， Dorn D， Hanson G. The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States［J］.American Economic Review，2013，103(6):2121-2168.
［7］Pierce J R， Schott P K. The surprisingly swift decline of US manufacturing employment ［J］. American Economic Review，2016，106(7): 1632-1662.
［8］Wang Z， Wei S J， Yu X D，et al. Reexamining the effects of trading with China on local labor markets: a supply chain perspective［EB/OL］.（2018-08-01）［2018-08-28］.http://www.nber.org/papers/w24886.pdf.
［9］Fort T C， Pierce J R， Schott P K. New perspectives on the decline of us manufacturing employment ［J］. Journal of Economic Perspectives，2018，32(2): 47-72.
［10］Lee E， Yi K M. Global value chains and inequality with endogenous labor supply［EB/OL］.（2018-08-01）［2018-08-28］.http://www.nber.org/papers/w24884.pdf.
［11］Rodriguezlopez A， Yu M J. Allaround table liberalization and firmlevel employment: theory and evidence from China［EB/OL］.（2017-10-09）［2018-08-28］. http://img.bimba.pku.edu.cn/resources/file/9/2017/10/09/20171009165233853.pdf.
［12］Lyon S G， Waugh M E. Redistributing the gains from trade through progressive taxation［EB/OL］.（2018-06-01）［2018-08-28］. http://www.nber.org/papers/w24784.pdf.
［13］Barattieri A， Cacciatore M， Ghironi F. Protectionism and the business cycle［EB/OL］.（2018-02-01）［2018-08-28］.http://www.nber.org/papers/w24353.pdf.
 ［14］Guo M， Lu L， Sheng L， et al. The day after tomorrow: evaluating the burden of Trump’s trade war［J］. Asian Economic Papers， 2018， 17(1):101-120.

相似文献/References:

[1]余淼杰,金洋.产能过剩的现状、前因后果与应对[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(05):48.
　YU Miaojie,JIN Yang.Current condition， causal relations and solution for overcapacity[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(05):48.
[2]龚秀国.从中美贸易摩擦透视中国与世界经济变革[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2019,21(05):10.
　GONG Xiuguo.China’s and global economic reform from the perspective of SinoUS trade conflicts[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2019,21(05):10.
[3]黄有光.如何正确评估中美贸易摩擦的影响[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2020,22(01):1.
　HUANG Youguang.How to correctly evaluate the influence of Sino-US trade friction[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2020,22(05):1.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金管理科学部面上项目(71573006)；教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目（15JJD780001）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-15