«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:

第23卷

期数:

2021年05期

页码:

73-84

栏目:

交通运输

出版日期:

2021-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:

Study on the transmission effect of consumption subsidies on the supply chain R&D of the new energy vehicle industry

文章编号:

1671-6248(2021)05-0073-12

作者:

何琳¹; 宋文卉²

(1. 北京交通大学 经济管理学院,北京 100044; 2. 广东财经大学 会计学院,广东 广州 510000)

Author(s):

HE Lin¹;  SONG Wenhui²

(1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. School of Accounting, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics,Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China)

关键词:

消费补贴;  政府补贴;  传导效应;  倾向得分匹配法;  新能源汽车;  供应链;  汽车产业;  技术创新

Keywords:

consumption subsidy;  government subsidy;  transmission effect;  propensity score matching(PSM);  new energy vehicle;  supply chain;  automobile industry;  technological innovation

分类号:

F426

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

各级政府投入千亿资金对新能源汽车产业进行的消费补贴,培育了消费市场,但是否促进了新能源汽车产业链的技术进步需要进一步研究。以2010～2020年间A股上市的汽车供应链238家企业为样本,采用倾向得分匹配法和多元回归方法,实证研究新能源汽车消费补贴对新能源整车上游零部件制造企业研发投入和研发产出的传导和激励效应。研究发现,设定技术门槛的消费补贴能够推动新能源供应链的技术创新行为,专利增长率和研发投入未跟随技术创新难度增大而呈现规律性波动,消费补贴促进了上游供应链企业持续加大研发投入,提高研发产出,在补贴退坡之后,企业的研发强度依然能够保持。研究表明,为扶持新能源汽车产业发展,政府需要继续重视新兴产业的消费补贴,利用资金传导传递市场预期的积极信息,激励企业技术研发行为; 当产业发展趋向稳定,政府的消费补贴可以逐渐退坡,通过非货币补贴政策、加大相关基础设施建设等继续传递政策支持信号,激励企业持续进行技术创新,从而促进新能源汽车产业持续高质量发展。

Abstract:

Governments at all levels have invested hundreds of billions of RMB in the form of consumption subsidies in the new energy vehicle industry, and cultivated the consumer market, but whether these measures have promoted the technological progress of the new energy vehicle industrial chain still requires further research. Based on the samples of 238 A-share listed vehicle supply chain enterprises from 2010 to 2020, this paper empirically studies the transmission and incentive effects of the Chinese government's new energy vehicle consumption subsidies on the R&D input and output of new energy vehicle upstream parts manufacturing enterprises by using the propensity score matching method(PSM)and multiple regression method. The results show that the consumption subsidies with established technology thresholds can promote the technological innovation behaviors of new energy vehicle supply chain enterprises, while patent growth rate and R&D investment did not follow the increasing difficulty of technological innovation and showed regular fluctuations, thus promoting the upstream supply chain enterprises to increase R&D investment and improve R&D output. After the decline in the amount of subsidies, the R&D intensity of enterprises can still remain in the same level. The research suggests that the government should continue to pay attention to consumption subsidies of emerging industries, transmit the positive message of market expectations with capital, and stimulate the technological R&D behaviors of enterprises so as to support the development of the new energy vehicle industry. When the industrial development tends to stabilize, the government can gradually reduce the consumption subsidies, continue to send signals of policy support through non-monetary subsidy policies and stepping up relevant infrastructure construction, encourage enterprises to continue technological innovation, so as to promote the sustainable and high-quality development of the emerging new energy vehicle industry.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈麟瓒,王保林.新能源汽车“需求侧”创新政策有效性的评估——基于全寿命周期成本理论[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(11):15-23.
[2]熊勇清,徐文.新能源汽车产业培育:“选择性”抑或“功能性”政策?[J].科研管理,2021,42(6):58-64.
[3]李磊.政府研发补贴对新能源汽车产业技术创新产出的影响研究[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(17):160-166.
[4]Shao W,Yang K,Bai X.Impact of financial subsidies on the R&D intensity of new energy vehicles:a case study of 88 listed enterprises in China[J].Energy Strategy Reviews,2021,33(4):1-8.
[5]Lach S.Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? evidence from Israel[J].Journal of Industrial Economics,2002,50(4):369-390.
[6]González X,Pazó C.Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?[J].Research Policy,2008,37(3):371-389.
[7]Lee E Y,Cin B C.The effect of risk-sharing government subsidy on corporate R&D investment:empirical evidence from Korea[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2010,77(6):881-890.
[8]曾繁荣,方玉,张雪笛.政府补助对企业技术创新的影响路径分析[J].财会通讯,2019(9):103-107.
[9]谷丽静,王星星.政府补助能促进企业技术创新吗?[J].中国注册会计师,2017(5):62-68.
[10]梅吟晨,宋良荣.财税政策对新能源汽车制造企业研发投入影响的实证分析[J].生产力研究,2017(11):25-29.
[11]Shrieves R E.Market structure and innovation:a new perspective[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1978,26(4):329-347.
[12]Higgins R S.Federal support of technological Gr in industry:some evidence of crowding out[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,1981,EM-28(4):86-88.
[13]Wallsten S J.Do government-industry R&D programs increase private R&D? the case of the small business innovation research program[R].Palo Alto:Stanford University Press,1999:82-100.
[14]吕久琴,郁丹丹.政府科研创新补助与企业研发投入:挤出、替代还是激励?[J].中国科技论坛,2011(8):21-27.
[15]刘虹,肖美凤,唐清泉.R&D补贴对企业R&D激励与挤出效应:基于中国上市公司数据的实证分析[J].经济管理,2012(4):19-27.
[16]侯世英,宋良荣.财政激励、融资激励与企业研发创新[J].中国流通经济,2019,33(7):85-94.
[17]Kang K N,Park H.Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs[J].Technovation,2012,32(1):68-78.
[18]郑春美,李佩.政府补助与税收优惠对企业创新绩效的影响——基于创业板高新技术企业的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015(16):89-93.
[19]谢海娟,金灿.内部控制影响政府科技创新补助使用效果研究[J].会计之友,2018(3):124-129.
[20]陈威,周友.负债融资、政府补助与企业创新——基于战略性新兴企业数据[J].会计之友,2019(15):48-54.
[21]熊维勤.税收和补贴政策对R&D效率和规模的影响——理论与实证研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(5):698-706.
[22]逯东,林高,杨丹.政府补助、研发支出与市场价值——来自创业板高新技术企业的经验证据[J].投资研究,2012,31(9):67-81.
[23]白旭云,王砚羽,苏欣.研发补贴还是税收激励——政府干预对企业创新绩效和创新质量的影响[J].科研管理,2019,40(6):9-18.
[24]任跃文.政府补贴有利于企业创新效率提升吗——基于门槛模型的实证检验[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(24):18-26.
[25]Minjeong K,Sam Y L.The effects of government financial support on business innovation in South Korea[J].Asian Journal of Technology Innovation,2011,19(1):67-83.
[26]李爽.R&D强度、政府支持度与新能源企业的技术创新效率[J].软科学,2016(30):11-14.
[27]余英,张丹丹.财政补贴、金融发展对技术创新两阶段影响——基于高新技术企业的研究[J].地方财政研究,2018(7):65-73.
[28]彭若弘,苏玉苗.创新补贴、税收优惠与高新技术产业研发产出[J].北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2019,21(6):77-89.
[29]彭鸿广,骆建文.激励供应商R&D努力的最优补贴策略研究[J].工业工程与管理,2011,16(5):41-47.
[30]Huang J,Leng M M,Liang L P,et al.Promoting electric automobiles:supply chain analysis under a government's subsidy incentive scheme[J].IIE Transactions,2013,45(8):826-844.
[31]罗春林.基于政府补贴的电动汽车供应链策略研究[J].管理评论,2014,26(12):198-205.
[32]张正,孟庆春,张文姬.技术创新情形下考虑政府补贴的供应链价值创造研究[J].软科学,2019,33(1):39-44.
[33]Zhang Y,Guo C,Wang L.Supply chain strategy analysis of low carbon subsidy policies based on carbon trading[J].Sustainability,2020,12(9):1-20.
[34]李柏洲,王雪,苏屹,等.我国战略性新兴产业间供应链企业协同创新演化博弈研究[J].中国管理科学,2021,29(8):136-147.
[35]孙菁,周红根,李启佳.股权激励与企业研发投入——基于PSM的实证分析[J].南方经济,2016(4):63-79.
[36]康志勇.政府补贴促进了企业专利质量提升吗?[J].科学学研究,2018,36(1):69-80.
[37]Rosenbaum P R,Rubin D B.The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J].Biometrika,1983,70(1):41-55.
[38]Lian Y,Su Z,Gu Y.Evaluating the effects of equity incentives using PSM:evidence from China[J].Frontiers of Business Research in China,2011,5(2):266-290.
[39]Rosenbaum P R,Rubin D B.Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score[J].American Statistician,1985,39(1):33-38.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2021-07-11
基金项目:北京市社会科学基金研究基地项目(18JDGLB001)
作者简介:何琳(1973-),女,江西南昌人,副教授,管理学博士。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-10