«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:

第23卷

期数:

2021年05期

页码:

31-40

栏目:

RCEP研究专题

出版日期:

2021-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:

RCEP and China's participation in the reform of global economic governance system: plight, opportunities and paths

文章编号:

1671-6248(2021)05-0031-10

作者:

韩永辉¹; 麦靖华²; 张帆¹

(1. 广东外语外贸大学 广东国际战略研究院,广东 广州 510420; 2. 广东外语外贸大学 经济贸易学院,广东 广州 510006)

Author(s):

HAN Yonghui¹;  MAI Jinghua²;  ZHANG Fan¹

(1. Guangdong Institute for International Strategies, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510420, Guangdong, China; 2. School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China)

关键词:

全球经济治理;  《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP);  经济全球化;  区域经济一体化;  治理体系改革;  逆全球化;  世界贸易组织(WTO)

Keywords:

global economic governance;  Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP);  economic globalization;  regional economic integration;  governance system reform;  reverse globalization;  World Trade Organization(WTO)

分类号:

F125; F744; F114.46

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

为识别中国参与全球经济治理体系改革面临的挑战,探索《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP)的签署为中国参与全球经济治理体系改革带来的机遇,对中国借力RCEP推动全球经济治理体系改革的路径进行研究。研究发现,既有全球经济治理体系机制建设滞后,个别国家蓄意设置治理障碍,逆全球化浪潮削弱了改革共识; RCEP能够为中国参与全球经济治理体系改革带来新的契机,有助于重构合理高效的全球经济治理机制,消弭单边和霸权主义障碍,弥合全球多边政治互信; 中国亟需紧抓RCEP签署的机遇,加快构建开放型经济新体制,凝聚区域经贸合作伙伴力量妥善处理中美竞合新关系,积极探索全球投资贸易治理机制创新,推动“一带一路”倡议与RCEP框架良好对接,守护多边主义,巩固政治互信。

Abstract:

In order to identify the challenges faced by China in its participation in the reform of global economic governance system, this paper explores the opportunities brought by the signing of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP), and studies the paths in which China promotes the reform of global economic governance system by employing RCEP. This paper finds that the existing institutions of global economic governance are obsolete, certain countries have deliberately set up governance barriers, and the wave of reverse globalization has weakened the multilateral consensus of reform worldwide. The signing of the RCEP can bring China new opportunities in its participation in the reform of global economic governance system, facilitate the reconstruction of a rational and efficient global economic governance mechanism, eliminate unilateral and hegemonic barriers, and promote political mutual trust among sovereign nations. It is suggested that China should seize this opportunity of signing the RCEP, accelerate the construction of institutionally open economy, utilize the joint efforts of all regional economic and trade partners to properly handle the Sino-US co-opetition relationship, actively explore the innovations in global investment and trade governance, boost the linkup between the "Belt and Road" initiative and the RCEP framework, and safeguard as well as consolidate the multilateral political mutual trust.

参考文献/References:

[1] Bown C P.Mega-regional trade agreements and the future of the WTO[J].Global Policy,2017,8(1):107-112.
[2]隋广军,查婷俊.贸易摩擦冲击下的全球经济治理体系变革——基于治理规则的视角[J].天津社会科学,2019(3):106-112.
[3]陈伟光,刘彬.全球经济治理的困境与出路:基于构建人类命运共同体的分析视阈[J].天津社会科学,2019(2):74-80.
[4]郝立新,周康林.构建人类命运共同体——全球治理的中国方案[J].马克思主义与现实,2017(6):1-7.
[5]林跃勤.全球经济治理变革与新兴国家制度性话语权提升研究[J].社会科学,2020(11):16-28.
[6]Menegazzi S.Rising powers and the reform of global economic governance:the BRICS and the normative challenge ahead[J].Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences,2020,13(1):135-150.
[7]Heldt E C,Mahrenbach L C.Rising powers in global economic governance:mapping the flexibility-empowerment nexus[J].Global Policy,2018,9(1):19-28.
[8]詹晓宁.全球投资治理新路径——解读《G20全球投资政策指导原则》[J].世界经济与政治,2016(10):4-18.
[9]沈铭辉,郭明英.大变局下的《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》:特征、影响与机遇[J].当代世界,2021(1):44-51.
[10]Stephen M D,Parízek M.New powers and the distribution of preferences in global trade governance:from deadlock and drift to fragmentation[J].New Political Economy,2019,24(6):735-758.
[11]Gruin J,Knaack P,Xu J.Tailoring for development:China's post-crisis influence in global financial governance[J].Global Policy,2018,9(4):467-478.
[12]韩永辉,李子文,张帆,等.中国双向FDI的环境效应[J].资源科学,2019,41(11):2043-2058.
[13]裴长洪.全球经济治理、公共品与中国扩大开放[J].经济研究,2014,49(3):4-19.
[14]Kahler M.Global governance:three futures[J].International Studies Review,2018,20(2):239-246.
[15]Hopewell K.Multilateral trade governance as social field:global civil society and the WTO[J].Review of International Political Economy,2015,22(6):1128-1158.
[16]卢静.全球经济治理体系变革与中国的角色[J].当代世界,2019(4):12-17.
[17]杨娜.全球经济治理机制的革新与探索——以RCEP的构建为例[J].国际经贸探索,2020,36(12):67-81.
[18]Nasr Y.Is the RCEP a cornerstone or just collaboration? regional general equilibrium model based on GAMS[J].Journal of Korea Trade,2020,24(1):171-207.
[19]Wu C.ASEAN at the crossroads:trap and track between CPTPP and RCEP[J].Journal of International Economic Law,2020,23(1):97-117.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈寰琦,何宇航.《中欧全面投资协定》数字金融核心规则解析 ——基于和RCEP/CETA比较[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2021,23(04):67.
　CHEN Huanqi,HE Yuhang.Analysis on the core rules of digital finance in the China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment:based on the comparison with RCEP/CETA[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2021,23(05):67.
[2]周方银,马宋若文.“印太经济框架”的内涵、走向及其面临的制约[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2023,25(01):88.
　ZHOU Fangyin,MA Songruowen.Connotation, direction and constraints of the “Indo-Pacific Economic Framework”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2023,25(05):88.
[3]施锦芳,隋霄.日本数字贸易规则制定方式、模板应用及启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2023,25(06):18.
　SHI Jinfang,SUI Xiao.Methods, template application and implications of Japan's formulation of digital trade rules[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2023,25(05):18.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2021-03-17
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(71603060; 71873041; 72073037); 广东省自然科学基金项目(2021A1515011814); 广东省软科学研究计划项目(2019A101002100)
作者简介:韩永辉(1986-),男,广东佛山人,教授,博士研究生导师,经济学博士。
通讯作者:麦靖华(1997-),女,广东广州人,产业经济学硕士研究生。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-10