|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]樊建强,郝国瑞,童夏.城市道路拥堵收费的理论架构、实践效果及启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(04):31-38.
　FAN Jian-qiang,HAO Guo-rui,TONG Xia.Urban road congestion charging theory, practice and enlightenment[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(04):31-38.
点击复制

城市道路拥堵收费的理论架构、实践效果及启示(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2013年04期
页码:
31-38
栏目:
交通运输
出版日期:
2013-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Urban road congestion charging theory, practice and enlightenment
作者:
樊建强; 郝国瑞; 童夏
长安大学 经济与管理学院,陕西 西安 710064
Author(s):
FAN Jian-qiang;  HAO Guo-rui;  TONG Xia
School of Economics and Management, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
城市道路;  道路拥堵收费;  交通供需矛盾;  交通需求管理;  外部成本
Keywords:
urban road;  road congestion charging;  traffic demand-supply contradiction;  traffic demand management;  external cost
分类号:
F572
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
利用文献调查法和比较分析法,系统分析了城市道路拥堵收费的理论基础,并进一步总结了伦敦和新加坡道路拥堵收费的成功经验,在此基础上提出中国实施道路拥堵收费的若干建议。分析认为:拥堵是全世界许多大城市所面临的棘手问题之一,其所带来的经济损失不容小视; 实施拥堵收费政策,有利于优化交通资源配置、增加社会福利; 在实施之前,应该做好前期准备工作、制定科学合理的实施方案,同时应该大力发展公共交通、确保收费收入的公正使用、最大限度地争取公众的理解和支持等,从而确保拥堵收费政策的顺利实施。
Abstract:
With literature review and comparative analysis, the theoretical foundation for urban road congestion charging is analyzed. The successful experiences of congestion charging in London and Singapore are summarized. Some suggestions for congestion charging in China are proposed. The analysis indicates that congestion is one of the urgent problems faced by many large cities, which will lead to economic losses; implementation of congestion charging policy will help to optimize traffic resources allocation and increase social welfare; prior to implementation, however, the govement should do some preparatory work and develop scientific and rational implementation scheme, at the same time, the govement should develop public transport, ensure a fair use of toll revenue, and try hard to get understanding and support from the public, so as to guarantee the successful implementation of congestion charging policy.

参考文献/References:

[1] Lam S H,Toan T D.Land transportpolicy and public transportin Singapore[J].Transportation,2006,33(2):171-188.
[2]Phang S Y,Toh R.Road congestion pricing in Singapore:1975-2003[J].Transportation Journal,2004(2):16-25.
[3]Knight F H.Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1924,38(8):582-606.
[4]Rouwendal J,Verhoef E T.Basic economic principles of road pricing:from theory to applications[J].Transport Policy,2006,13(2):106-114.
[5]Santos G,Fraser G.Road pricing:lessons from London [J].Economic Policy,2006,21(4):263-310.
[6]Noland R B.The effect of the London congestion charge on road casualties:anintervention analysis[J].Transportation,2008,35(1):73-91.
[7]Leape J.The London congestion charge[J].Economic Perspectives,2006,20(4):157-176.
[8]Santos G,Button K,Noll R G.London congestion Charging[J].Urban Affairs,2008(5):177-234.
[9]岳芳菲,沈映春.北京市交通拥挤收费的可行性探究[J].北京社会科学,2010(1):33-37.
[10]张晓莲.城市道路拥堵收费政策的公众接受分析[J].武汉交通职业学院学报,2012,14(3):22-25.
[11]罗朝晖,姚源果,韦增欣.基于时间价值的双准则交通拥挤收费决策模型[J].统计与决策,2013(10):30-33.
[12]江捷,刘龙胜.交通拥挤收费政策的经济影响分析[J].城市交通,2013(1):60-66.
[13]Rjesson M B,Eliasson J,Muriel B,等.斯德哥尔摩的拥挤收费政策:政策实施5年后的效果、接受度及经验启示[J].城市交通,2012(3):75-91.
[14]郭永庆,谭雪梅.拥挤收费、边际成本定价与福利[J].财经问题研究,2007(2):30-33.
[15]王莹玉,贾俊芳.交通拥挤收费措施效益分析及借鉴与建议[J].综合运输,2007(1):33-36.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2013-09-03 基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(12CJY067); 陕西省社会科学基金项目(10E229); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(CHD2009JC093) 作者简介:樊建强(1974-),男,陕西扶风人,副教授,工学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-12-20