|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙乾博.读解春秋早期的齐鲁两国关系[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(01):104-110.
　SUN Qian-bo.Interpretating the relationship between the Qi and the Lu in the early period of Spring and Autumn[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(01):104-110.
点击复制

读解春秋早期的齐鲁两国关系(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2013年01期
页码:
104-110
栏目:
历史学
出版日期:
2013-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Interpretating the relationship between the Qi and the Lu in the early period of Spring and Autumn
作者:
孙乾博
北京师范大学 历史学院,北京 100875
Author(s):
SUN Qian-bo
School of History, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
关键词:
齐国;  鲁国;  郑国;  争霸
Keywords:
the Qi;  the Lu;  the Zheng;  contend for hegemony
分类号:
K225
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以先秦史文献为基础,对春秋早期齐鲁两国间的博弈及其相互关系进行了梳理,揭示了齐国能够称霸和之所以没有吞并鲁国及各国臣服的内在与外在原因。分析认为:尽管齐鲁之间并没有拼出个你死我活的结局,但“主客”间已经易位,周王室宗主国鲁国的“王权”已经彻底让位给一个新兴大国齐国的“霸权”,因此也就直接反映出一个新时代的来临。
Abstract:
Based on pre-Qin historical materials, the game and correlation between the Qi and the Lu in the early period of Spring and Autumn were analyzed. This paper reveals the reasons that the Qi can contend for hegemony and the Lu could not be annexed. Although the Qi and the Lu did not lead to a life-and-death ending, but the situation had changed, the Lu had already been subject to the Qi.

参考文献/References:

[1] 晁福林.春秋战国的社会变迁[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011.
[2]童书业.春秋史[M].北京:中华书局,2006.
[3]杨伯峻.春秋左传注[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
[4]顾德融,朱顺龙.春秋史[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
[5]高士奇.左传纪事本末[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
[6]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1999.
[7]陈 涛.晏子春秋译注[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[8]杨伯峻.孟子译注[M].北京:中华书局,1960.
[9]尚学锋,夏德靠.国语译注[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[10]李 山.管子译注[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
[11]孙希旦.礼记集解[M].北京:中华书局,1989.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2012-09-15 作者简介:孙乾博(1987-),男,吉林长春人,历史学硕士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-03-20