|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]干潇露.价格歧视抑或价格挤压 ——辨析中国电信、联通滥用市场支配地位行为之认定[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2012,14(02):101-108.
　GAN Xiao-lu.Price discrimination or price squeeze —identification of China telecom and unicom's dominant position abuse[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2012,14(02):101-108.
点击复制

价格歧视抑或价格挤压 ——辨析中国电信、联通滥用市场支配地位行为之认定(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第14卷
期数:
2012年02期
页码:
101-108
栏目:
法学
出版日期:
2012-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Price discrimination or price squeeze —identification of China telecom and unicom's dominant position abuse
作者:
干潇露
华东政法大学 研究生教育院,上海 200042
Author(s):
GAN Xiao-lu
School of Graduate, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
关键词:
价格歧视;  价格挤压;  互联网接入;  市场支配地位
Keywords:
price discrimination;  price squeeze;  internet access;  dominant market position
分类号:
D922.231
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为辨析价格歧视与价格挤压这2种滥用市场支配地位行为之区别,完善《中国人民共和国反垄断法》立法和执法制度,分析了中国电信行业的现状、电信市场的结构、电信业垄断运营商的定价行为、价格挤压与价格歧视的概念比较、价格挤压的构成要件,并介绍了互联网接入市场价格挤压之国际案件。分析认为:电信、联通对与其有直接竞争关系的运营商和没有竞争关系的经营者、终端用户实行不同接入价格之行为应当被认定为价格挤压行为,而非价格歧视行为。
Abstract:
In order to classify the differences of price discrimination and price squeeze, which are two category of dominant position abuse, and to make contribution to the promotion of China's Anti-mon-opoly Law litigation and enforcement system, this paper analyzed the status quo of Chinese telecommunication industry, its structure, the pricing act of monopolistic operator, the definition comparison of price discrimination and price squeeze, the factors contributed to price squeeze and relevant international cases in this area. The result indicates that China telecom's and unicom's act should be taken as prize squeeze rather than price discrimination when they enact higher price of internet access for other ISPs who directly compete with China telecom and unicom in retail market.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中国电信与联通遭反垄断调查[EB/OL].(2011-11-09)
[2011-12-08].http://tech.ifeng.com/telecom/special/fanlongduan/.
[2]曼昆.经济学原理:微观经济学分册[M].梁小民,译.北京:北京大学出版社, 2006.
[3]OECD.Working Party No.2 on competition and regulation:margin squeeze the United States [EB/OL].(2009-10-19)
[2011-12-08].http://www.ftc.gov/bc/international/docs/marginsqueezeus.pdf.
[4]杨 东.国际上电信公司反垄断典型案例精选[EB/OL].(2011-11-12)
[2011-12-08].http://www.antimon-opolylaw.org/article/default.asp?id=3491.
[5]崇 鲁.论电信联通是否在互联网市场滥用市场支配力和价格歧视[EB/OL].(2011-11-18)
[2011-12-08].http://tech.ifeng.com/telecom/detail_2011_11/18/10754536_0.shtml.
[6]唐雄燕.中国宽带网络发展展望[EB/OL].(2010-12-10)
[2011-12-09].http://wenku.baidu.com/view/6c183c6825c52cc58bd6be62.html?from=rec&pos=0&weight=14&lastweight=5&count=5.
[7]郑奇宝.从垄断到竞争:电信行业规制理论与实证研究[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2005.
[8]Buigues P A,Klotz R.Margin squeeze in regulated industries:the CFI judgment in the Deutsche telekom case[EB/OL].(2008-07-21)
[2011-12-10].http://www.hunton.com/files/Publication/f796af5f-220c-4c0b-8f15-26bb328c3e05/Pr-sentation/PublicationAttachment/059 811dd-888c-46f3-b 0e4-1d85b5a704ee/klotz_margin_squeeze.PDF.
[9]工业与信息化部.互联网交换中心网间结算办法附录[EB/OL].(2008-01-10)
[2011-12-10].http://news.xinhuanet.com/newmedia/2008-01/11/content_74058 55.htm.
[10]李治国.价格挤压风吹响电信业:谈欧盟电信业价格挤压认定新趋势[J].中国电信业,2009(12):69-71.
[11]Official Journal of the European Committee.Commission guidelines on market analysis and the asessment of significant market power under the community regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services [EB/OL].(2002-11-10)
[2011-12-10].http://www.fub.it/files/COMMIS～1.PDF.
[12]Crocioni P,Veljanovski C.Price squeezes,foreclosure and competition law:principles and guidelines [EB/OL].(2003-04-02)
[2011-12-10].http://ssrn.com/abstract=1963659.
[13]ERG.Report on the discussion on the application of margin squeeze tests to bundles [EB/OL].(2009-03-01)
[2011-12-11].http://erg.eu.int/doc/publications/2009/erg_09_07_report_on_the_ discussion_of_the_application_of_margin_squeeze_tests_to_bundles.pdf.
[14]Faella G,Pardolesi R.Squeezing price squeeze under EC antitrust law [EB/OL].(2009-09-26)
[2011-12-11].http://ssrn.com/abstract=1478937.
[15]Damien G,O'Donoghue R.The concurrent application of competition law and regulation:the case of margin squeeze abuses in the telecommunications sector [EB/OL].(2005-02-01)
[2011-12-11].http://ssrn.com/abstract=671804.
[16]Deutsche Telekom AG.Commission of the European communities [EB/OL].(2008-03-10)
[2011-12-11].http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf; jsessionid=9ea7d0f130ded86df8f8e8494aa5a 992abdbd 04f2c9e.e34KaxiLc3eQc40LaxqMbN4NchqL e0? text=&docid=71055&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN &mode=doc&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=463001.
[17]Judgment of the Court of First Instance.BPB industrie des poudres Sphériques SA v.commission [EB/OL].(2000-11-30)
[2011-12-11].http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:61997TJ 0005:EN:PDF.
[18]Commission of the European Committees.Relating to a proceedings under article 82 of the EC treaty(case comp/38.784 - wanadoo Espa?a vs.Telefónica)[EB/OL].(2007-07-04)
[2011-12-12].http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/38784/ 38784_311_10.pdf.
[19]Diez F,Regulation T.Antitrust and margin squeeze:widen-ing the already wide gap between US and EU competition policy [EB/OL].(2011-01-09)
[2011-12-12].http://ssrn.com/abstract=1828723.
[20]Legal Information Institute.Verizon communications inc.v.law offices of curtis v.trinko LLP [EB/OL].(2004-01-13)
[2011-12-13].http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/02-682/#writing-ZS.
[21]Legal Information Institute.Pacific bell telephone company,dba AT&T California,et al.,petitioners v.linkline communications,INC.,et al [EB/OL].(2009-02-25)
[2011-12-13].http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/ 07-512.ZO.html.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2011-12-01 基金项目:华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养科研项目(103035); 华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养研究项目(20113022) 作者简介:干潇露(1987-),女,浙江上虞人,法学硕士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-06-20