|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]吴从祥.谶纬与汉代迁都思潮之关系[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2011,13(02):23-27.
　WU Cong-xiang.Relationship between Chen wei and thoughts in moving capital in Han Dynasty[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2011,13(02):23-27.
点击复制

谶纬与汉代迁都思潮之关系(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第13卷
期数:
2011年02期
页码:
23-27
栏目:
长安学研究暨黄帝文化会议专题
出版日期:
2011-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relationship between Chen wei and thoughts in moving capital in Han Dynasty
作者:
吴从祥
绍兴文理学院 人文学院,浙江 绍兴 312000
Author(s):
WU Cong-xiang
School of Humanities, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China
关键词:
汉代;  谶纬;  迁都;  政治神话
Keywords:
Han Dynasty;  Chen wei;  moving capital;  political mythology
分类号:
K234.1/G112
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
依据文献史料,分析了谶纬与汉代迁都思潮之间的关系、谶纬对汉代都城文化的影响。分析认为,西汉末士人欲以迁都解“更命”之危机,王莽欲迁都以应谶纬; 光武修旧都以证其承“尧后火德”之正统,却导致了人们的迁都之念; 明帝时人们怀疑都洛不应天命,于是迁都之议再起; 董卓以图谶为由迁都长安,曹操迎天子于许昌,曹丕应图谶而代汉。分析还认为,迁都思潮往往是国家信仰危机的产物,往往与权力之争和政权变迁密切相关; 受谶纬天命思想影响,都城不再仅仅是行政区域的代称,往往成为天命的象征。
Abstract:
Based on historical documents, the close relationship between Chen wei and thoughts in moving capital in Han Dynasty is analyzed in the paper. Some people advocate that moving capital to Chang'an could save Han Empire. WANG Mang moved capital to Chang'an for Chen wei; and the Em-peror Guangwu repaired the old capital in order to demonstrate the legitimism of his power, which led to the thought of moving capital for someone. Some people suspected that building capital in Chang'an was unfit to God's will, which led to the thought of moving capital again. DONG Zhuo moved capital to Chang'an for Chen wei, then CAO Cao moved the Empire of Han Dynasty to Xuchang. As a result, the Empire of Han Dynasty was replaced by CAO Pi. The auther finds that the crisis of belief was the important reason of the appearance of Chen wei, because politics became more mystical and unreasonable under the influence of Chen wei. The capital, at that time, was already the symbol of God's will and the city of central authorities.

参考文献/References:

[1] 班 固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
[2]范 晔.后汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
[3]刘 珍,吴树平.东观汉记校注[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[4]王树民.廿二史札记校证[M].订补本.北京:中华书局,1984.
[5]杨 权.新五德理论与两汉政治:“尧后火德”说考论[M].北京:中华书局,2006.
[6]安居香山,中村璋八.纬书集成[M].吕宗力,栾保群,译.石家庄:河北人民出版社,1994.
[7]陈 寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
[8]恩斯特·卡西尔.国家的神话[M].张国忠,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,1988.

相似文献/References:

[1]王双怀.西安国际化大都市建设之我见[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2011,13(01):7.
　WANG Shuang-huai.My suggestions for constructing Xi'an into an internationally metropolitan city[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2011,13(02):7.
[2]贾俊侠.汉代长安的酒业与饮酒风尚[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2011,13(04):22.
　JIA Jun-xia.Wine industry and drinking fashion of Chang'an in Han Dynasty[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2011,13(02):22.
[3]崔建华.河东地区在汉代青铜文化中的历史表现[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(04):133.
　CUI Jian-hua.Performance of Hedong in bronze culture of Han dynasty[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(02):133.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2011-03-25 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目(09YJC751061) 作者简介:吴从祥(1973-),男,江西九江人,副教授,博士后。
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-06-20