|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郭大水.狭义社会学的两个基础学理[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):51-58.
 GUO Da-shui.Two foundational theories of narrow sociology[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(03):51-58.
点击复制

狭义社会学的两个基础学理(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2016年03期
页码:
51-58
栏目:
共生社会学
出版日期:
2016-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Two foundational theories of narrow sociology
作者:
郭大水
南开大学 周恩来政府管理学院,天津 300350
Author(s):
GUO Da-shui
School of Public Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China
关键词:
狭义社会学理论融合社会事实社会行动社会学视角“社会的”
Keywords:
risk society individualization social symbiosis community
分类号:
C91-0
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从迪尔凯姆的“社会事实理论”和韦伯的“社会行动理论”中提取“社会的”共有要素,即“社会的”是对个人、群体、社会3个层次社会现象的“惯例”“指向他人的行为动机”侧面的抽象,构成社会学概念体系的内核;将“社会的”作为投影视角,建构对社会现象的“投影世界”,构成一个认识上的整体,形成社会学学科体系。研究认为,以“社会的”为理论对象的社会学必然有专业性且平等于其他社会科学学科,可称为狭义社会学。
Abstract:
To solve the problem that the loss of traditional authority increased personal insecurity, this paper proposed that overcoming personal risks to realize social symbiosis is an important solution. For the implementation of social symbiosis in individualized risks, its essential to clarify the concept and guidance of social symbiosis, which means that social symbiosis includes individualization and individualization is bounded by social symbiosis. Furthermore, reasonable symbiosis patterns needs to be actively sought for practice. Social inclusion should be strengthened from the design of top systems and new communities should be cultivated.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-14