|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]胡再勇.中国与“一带一路”六大经济走廊基础设施的双边贸易成本效应研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2021,23(02):48-60.
　HU Zaiyong.Research on the bilateral trade cost effects of the infrastructures ofChina and the Six Economic Corridors under "The Belt and Road"[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2021,23(02):48-60.
点击复制

中国与“一带一路”六大经济走廊基础设施的双边贸易成本效应研究(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
48-60
栏目:
国际经济与贸易
出版日期:
2021-03-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the bilateral trade cost effects of the infrastructures ofChina and the Six Economic Corridors under "The Belt and Road"
文章编号:
1671-6248(2021)02-0048-13
作者:
胡再勇
外交学院 国际经济学院,北京 100037
Author(s):
HU Zaiyong
School of International Economics, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing 100037, China
关键词:
“一带一路”;  六大经济走廊;  基础设施;  双边贸易成本;  自由贸易协定;  运输时间
Keywords:
The Belt and Road;  Six Economic Corridors;  infrastructure;  bilateral trade cost;  free trade agreement;  transportation time
分类号:
F740
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在测算中国与“一带一路”六大经济走廊沿线国家双边贸易成本的基础上,基于引力方程和广义矩估计法,分析基础设施及其交互作用对双边贸易成本的影响。研究表明,随着时间推移,中国与六大经济走廊沿线国家的平均双边贸易成本虽然波折起伏,且与各经济走廊沿线国家的平均双边贸易成本的水平、下降幅度存在较大差异,但整体呈下降趋势。在控制人均收入差额、距离、贸易开放度、是否签署自由贸易协定、两国是否有共同边界等显著性影响因素后,研究发现,海运基础设施、陆空运基础设施以及二者的交互作用均能显著降低双边贸易成本,其中海运基础设施和陆空运基础设施交互作用的双边贸易成本效应较基础设施本身的双边贸易成本效应要低。
Abstract:
Based on the measuring and calculating the bilateral trade costs between China and the countries along the Six Economic Corridors under "The Belt and Road", this paper analyzes the impact of infrastructures and their interactions on the bilateral trade costs based on gravity equation and the Generalized Method of Moments(GMM). The research shows that the average bilateral trade costs between China and the countries along the Six Economic Corridors fluctuated over time, but the overall downward trend is very significant; the average level and the descend range of the bilateral trade costs between China and each country along the economic corridors are quite diverse, but the overall trends are also downward. After putting the significant impactors under control, such as the gap of per capita income, distance, trade openness, whether or not having signed a free trade agreement, whether or not sharing a border, etc., the study finds that the maritime infrastructure, land and air transport infrastructure and their interaction can significantly reduce the bilateral trade costs, in which the effect of infrastructure interaction on reducing bilateral trade costs is lower than that of infrastructures themselves.

参考文献/References:

[1] Soyres D F,Mulabdic A,Murray S,et al.How much will the Belt and Road Initiative reduce trade costs?[EB/OL].(2018-10-15)[2020-10-27].http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/592771539630482582/pdf/WPS8614.pdf.
[2]Bouet A,Mishra S,Roy D.Does Africa trade less than it should,and if so,why?: the role of market access and domestic factors[EB/OL].(2008-03-15)[2020-10-27].http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/42320/2/ifpridp00770.pdf.
[3]Gelbis M G,Nijkamp P,Poot J.Infrastructure and trade: a meta-analysis [J].Region,2014,1(1):25-65.
[4]Obstfeld M,Rogoff K.The six puzzles in international macroeconomics: is there a common cause?[EB/OL].(2020-07-15)[2020-10-27].https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w7777/w7777.pdf.
[5]Limao N,Venables A J.Infrastructure,geographical disadvantage,transport costs,and trade [J].The World Bank Economic Review,2001(3):451-479.
[6]UNCTAD.Review of maritime transport 2019[EB/OL].(2019-10-30)[2020-10-27].https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2019_en.pdf.
[7]Hummels D.Toward a geography of trade costs[EB/OL].(2001-09-15)[2020-10-27].https://krannert.purdue.edu/faculty/hummelsd/research/toward/TGTC.pdf.
[8]Andeson J E,Neary J P.The trade restrictiveness of the Multi-Fibre Arrangement[J].World Bank Economic Review,1994,8(2):171-189.
[9]Anderson J E,Wincoop E V.Trade costs[J].Journal of Economic Literature,2004,42(3): 691-751.
[10]McCallum J.National borders matter:Canada-U.S.regional trade patterns[J].American Economic Review,1995,85(3):615-623.
[11]WEI S J.Intra-national versus international trade: how stubborn are nations in global integration?[EB/OL].(1996-04-01)[2020-10-21].https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6716039.pdf.
[12]Evans C L.The economic significance of national border effects[J].American Economic Review,2003,93(4):1291-1312.
[13]Anderson J E,Wincoop E V.Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle[J].American Economic Review,2003,93(1): 170-192.
[14]Novy D.Is the iceberg melting less quickly? International trade costs after World War II[EB/OL].(2006-07-10)[2020-10-21].http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1436/1/WRAP_Novy_twerp_764.pdf.
[15]Rose A K,Wincoop E V.National money as a barrier to international trade: the real case for currency union[J].American Economic Review,2001,91(2): 386-390.
[16]Eaton J,Kortum S.Technology,geography,and trade[J].Econometrica,2002,70(5): 1741-1779.
[17]CHEN N,Novy D.International trade integration: a disaggregated approach[EB/OL].(2008-02-22)[2020-10-21].https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/gep/documents/seminars/2008/dennis-novy.pdf.
[18]Novy D.Gravity redux: measuring international trade costs with panel data[J].Economic Inquiry,2012,51(1):101-121.
[19]Deardorff A V,Stern R M.Measurement of nontariff barriers[M].Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,1998.
[20]Laird S,Yeats A.Quantitative methods for trade-barrier analysis[M].New York:New York University Press,1990.
[21]Goldberg P K,Verboven F.The evolution of price dispersion in European car markets[J].The Review of Economic Studies,2001,68(4):811-848.
[22]Engel C,Rogers J H.How wide is the border?[J].American Economic Review,1996,86(5):1112-1125.
[23]Engel C,Rogers J H.Deviations from purchasing power parity: causes and welfare costs[J].Journal of International Economics,2001,55(1):29-57.
[24]Obstfeld M,Taylor A M.Nonlinear aspects of goods-market arbitrage and adjustment:Heckscher’s commodity points revisited[J].Journal of Japan International Economics,1997,11(4): 441-479.
[25]Crucini M J,Telmer C I,Zachariadis M.Dispersion in real exchange rates[EB/OL].(1998-06-15)[2020-10-21].http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/VUECON/vu00-w13.pdf.
[26]Parsley D C,WEI S J.Limiting currency volatility to stimulate goods market integration: a price based approachs[EB/OL].(2001-09-15)[2020-10-21].https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6715784.pdf.
[27]方虹,彭博,冯哲,等.国际贸易中双边贸易成本的测度研究——基于改进的引力模型[J].财贸经济,2010(5):71-76.
[28]钱学锋,梁琦.测度中国与G7的双边贸易成本——一个改进引力模型方法的应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008(2):53-62.
[29]王领,桑梦倩.中国与新兴市场的贸易成本及其影响因素研究[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(4):75-82.
[30]张毓卿,周才云.中国对外贸易成本的测度及其影响因素——基于面板数据模型的实证分析[J].经济学家,2015(9):11-20.
[31]康晓玲,张莹.我国与“一带一路”沿线国家双边贸易成本的测算和影响因素分析[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016(7):77-86.
[32]冯宗宪,米嘉伟,张军.中国与“一带一路”国家双边贸易成本测度及其影响因素研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2017,37(4):36-44.
[33]刘洪铎,蔡晓珊.中国与“一带一路”沿线国家的双边贸易成本研究[J].经济学家,2016(7):92-100.
[34]孙瑾,杨英俊.中国与“一带一路”主要国家贸易成本的测度与影响因素研究[J].国际贸易问题,2016(5):94-103.
[35]张静,武拉平.中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易成本弹性测度与分析:基于超对数引力模型[J].世界经济研究,2018(3):69-80.
[36]王筱欣,刘秋萍.中国与“一带一路”沿线主要国家贸易成本及影响因素测度——基于改进的引力模型[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学),2019,33(4):38-47.
[37]胡再勇,付韶军,张璐超.“一带一路”基础设施的国际贸易效应研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2019(2):24-44.
[38]Evenett S,Keller W.On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation[J].Journal of Political Economy,2002,110(2): 281-316.
[39]OECD.ITF transport outlook 2017[M].Paris: OECD Publishing,2017.

相似文献/References:

[1]李晓峰,宋亚奇.“一带一路”背景下中国服务贸易发展机遇与问题分析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(02):55.
　LI Xiao-feng,SONG Ya-qi.Opportunities and problems of Chinese service trade in the context of “OBOR”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(02):55.
[2]程中兴.“一带一路”的战略理念与空间生产[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(04):44.
　CHENG Zhong-xing.Strategic concept and spatial production of “One Belt and One Road”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(02):44.
[3]王建伟,马姣姣.中国与“一带一路”沿线东南亚国家跨境物流协作 ——基于物流绩效指数(LPI)[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(04):56.
　WANG Jian wei,MA Jiao jiao.Study of crossborder logistics collaboration between China and Southeast Asian countries along the Belt and Road ——based on LPI[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):56.
[4]岳鹰.“一带一路”沿线国家海外投资间接转股的外资法风险[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(04):71.
　YUE Ying.Countries along the Belt and Road indirect sharetransfer legal risk from foreign investment law[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):71.
[5]白艳.“一带一路”背景下中国企业海外投资合规风险控制策略[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(04):79.
　BAI Yan.Compliance risk control strategies of overseas investment for Chinese enterprises under the background of the Belt and Road[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):79.
[6]王建伟,杜逸芸,张诗青.基于可达性与经济联系的“一带一路”经济带引力格局划分[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(04):64.
　WANG Jian-wei,DU Yi-yun,ZHANG Shi-qing.Study on the distribution pattern of gravity in the Belt and Road based on accessibility and economic ties[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):64.
[7]王建伟,马姣姣,张诗青,等.“一带一路”倡议下广西区域通道[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(06):62.
　WANG Jian-wei,MA Jiao-jiao,ZHANG Shi-qing,et al.Construction of logistics network in regional channel of Guangxi under “the belt and road” initiative[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):62.
[8]刘明德,王梦.全球影响力分析框架下的中尼能源关系[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(06):69.
　LIU Ming-de,WANG Meng.Energy relationship between China and Nigeria under analysis framework of global influence[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):69.
[9]余淼杰,金洋.产能过剩的现状、前因后果与应对[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(05):48.
　YU Miaojie,JIN Yang.Current condition， causal relations and solution for overcapacity[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(02):48.
[10]王跻崭.“一带一路”沿线东南亚国家林业资源开发[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2019,21(05):35.
　WANG Jizhan.Exploitation of forestry resources in Southeast Asian countries along “the Belt and Road”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2019,21(02):35.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-11-03
基金项目:北京市社会科学基金项目(18ZGB003); 中央高校基本科研业务费重大创新项目(3162019ZYKA03)
作者简介:胡再勇(1976-),男,湖北浠水人,教授,经济学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-10