|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]朱利民,朱昭,马妍.王国维“通人之学”与“专人之学”的尺短寸长[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2019,21(06):93-100.
　ZHU Limin,ZHU Zhao,MA Yan.Advantages and disadvantages on the studies of “wide general knowledge” and “special expertise” by WANG Guowei[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2019,21(06):93-100.
点击复制

王国维“通人之学”与“专人之学”的尺短寸长(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
93-100
栏目:
历史学
出版日期:
2020-01-06

文章信息/Info

Title:
Advantages and disadvantages on the studies of “wide general knowledge” and “special expertise” by WANG Guowei
作者:
朱利民1; 朱昭2; 马妍3
1.西安市社会科学院，陕西 西安710054；2.陕西学前师范学院 教育科学学院，陕西 西安710100；3.中国矿业大学 马克思主义学院，北京100083
Author(s):
ZHU Limin1; ZHU Zhao2; MA Yan3
1. Xi’an Academy of Social Sciences，Xi’an 710054,Shaanxi，China；2. School of Educational Science，Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University，Xi’an 710100,Shaanxi，China；3. School of Marxism，China University of Mining and Technology，Beijing 100083，China
关键词:
“静安之学”; “通人之学”; “专人之学”; 二重证据法; 敦煌
Keywords:
.Key words: “learnings by WANG Guowei”; “study of wide general knowledge”; “study of special expertise”; dual evidence method; Dunhuang
分类号:
I207;B259.9;K825.1
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
王国维“通人之学”“专人之学”等学术思想是中国学术研究转型的重大创新，通过对王国维学术成长的梳理、学术成果的分析、学术思想的论证，对“静安之学”进行了全面系统的研究。研究认为，王国维凭借厚实的知识贮备，批判地继承西方哲学理论与中国古代哲学思想，在构建中国大文科的学科体系、研究文史哲的学术体系和中国学者的学术话语体系方面做出了全面系统实践，取得重大进展和开创性成果，堪称开一代风气的大学者；王国维以创辟胜解、通方知类的学术思辨，创立二重证据方法，探索出一条由“通人之学”到“专人之学”学问研究蹊径。系统审读、反思静安之学，对我们严肃读书风气、匡正学问研究态度、提倡学术争鸣、甄别解决知识产权争端、清除学术造假现象、规范学术研究流程，能够起到见贤思齐、弃旧图新之作用。
Abstract:
The academic ideas of WANG Guowei, such as the “study of wide general knowledge” and the “study of special expertise”, are major innovations in the transformation of China’s academic research. By summarizing the academic growth of WANG Guowei, analyzing his academic achievements and demonstrating his academic thoughts, this paper conducts a comprehensive and systematic research on the “learnings by WANG Guowei”. Research believes that with a solid knowledge reserve, WANG Guowei critically inherited the western philosophical theoriesand ancient Chinese philosophical ideas. He implemented a comprehensive and systematic practice in terms of building a comprehensive discipline system of China’s liberal arts, the academic system of studying literature, history and philosophy, and the academic discourse system of Chinese scholars, made remarkable progress and pioneering achievements, and can be thus said to bean accomplished scholar that leads a new generation of ethos.WANG Guowei, with his academic thinking in pioneering innovation and understanding as well as wide knowledge and dedicated focus, created a dual evidence method, and explored and developed a research approach from the “study of wide general knowledge” to the “study of special expertise”. The systematic review and reflection on WANG Guowei’s learnings can help us emulate those better than ourselves and discard the old for the new, by disciplining our atmosphere of learning, rectifying our attitude of academic research, advocating academic contentions and discussions, identifying and solving intellectual property disputes, eliminating academic frauds, and standardizing the academic research processes.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介：朱利民（1963-），男，陕西西安人，教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-06