|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李晓峰,郑秉坤.“一带一路”背景下中国与美国金融生产性服务业产业关联问题研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(03):68-75.
　LI Xiao-feng,ZHENG Bing-kun.Correlation of the financial producer services industrybetween China and the United States under the background of “the Belt and Road”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(03):68-75.
点击复制

“一带一路”背景下中国与美国金融生产性服务业产业关联问题研究(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
68-75
栏目:
经济管理
出版日期:
2018-08-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
Correlation of the financial producer services industrybetween China and the United States under the background of “the Belt and Road”
作者:
李晓峰; 郑秉坤
广东外语外贸大学 经济贸易学院,广东 广州 510006
Author(s):
LI Xiao-feng; ZHENG Bing-kun 
Economics and Trade College，Guangdong University of Foreign Studies，Guangzhou 510006，Guangdong，China
关键词:
产性服务业; 金融业; 产业关联系数; 投入产出表
Keywords:
producer services industry;  financial industry;  industrial correlation coefficient;  inputoutput table
分类号:
F719
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了比较研究中美两国金融服务业的发展差异，理清中国在加入世界贸易组织（WTO）后金融服务业的演进趋势，探究中国金融服务业与其他国民产业部门的关联关系，通过对比分析中美两国金融服务业的中间投入率以及产业关联系数，在当前中国处于新常态下的经济结构转型时期下，尝试从比较结果中得出如何深层次地深化金融改革、如何进一步研究金融生产性服务业与实体经济关联关系并探索其如何更好地服务于实体经济的经验。鉴于金融业的发展对于促进和稳定国民经济发展的作用，采用WIOD数据库中中美两国2007～2014年的9个行业部门投入产出数据，对两国金融服务业以及整体服务业的中间投入率、产业关联系数进行横向和纵向的比较研究。研究表明：中国金融服务业近年来发展迅速，但是我国服务业的整体发展水平还不及美国；美国金融生产性服务业的产业关联系数均大于中国，反映了中国金融生产性服务业与世界发达国家的差距和不足。随着“一带一路”的深入实施，中国应推进深层次金融改革、加大服务业投入占比等，以让金融业更好服务实体经济。
Abstract:
In order to compare the development differences in the financial services industry between China and the United States,clarify the evolution trend of China’s financial services industry after joining the World Trade Organization (WTO),and explore the relationship between China’s financial services industry and other national industrial sectors,how to deepen financial reforms in depth,how to further study the relationship between financial producer services and the real economy and explore how they can better serve the real economy were draw from the comparison results in the current economic restructuring period under the new normal of China through comparative analysis of the intermediate investment rate and industrial correlation coefficient of the financial services industry in China and the United States.In view of the role of the financial industry development in promoting and stabilizing the national economy development,the input and output data of the nine industry sectors of China and the United States from 2007 to 2014 in the WIOD database were used,and then horizontal and vertical comparative studies on the intermediate input rate and industrial correlation coefficient between the financial services industry and the overall service industry in the two countries were carried out.The research shows that China’s financial services industry has developed rapidly in recent years,but the overall development level of service industry is not as good as that of the United States; the industrial correlation coefficient of financial producer services in the United States is greater than that in China,reflecting the gap and deficiency between China’s financial producer services and developed countries.With the indepth implementation of “the Belt and Road”,China should promote deep financial reforms and increase the investment ratio of the service industry,so that the financial industry can better serve the real economy.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-03