|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]董银果,丰利锋.中国农产品SPS保护水平评估的实证研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2018,20(01):45-54.
　DONG Yin-guo,FENG Li-feng.Empirical study on the assessment of SPS protection level of agricultural products in China[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2018,20(01):45-54.
点击复制

中国农产品SPS保护水平评估的实证研究(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
45-54
栏目:
农村问题研究
出版日期:
2018-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Empirical study on the assessment of SPS protection level of agricultural products in China
作者:
董银果; 丰利锋
华东理工大学商学院，上海 200273
Author(s):
DONG Yin-guo; FENG Li-feng
School of Business,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237，China
关键词:
SPS保护水平; 卫生与植物检疫; 大豆; AHP灰色模糊评价方法; 国际法典委员会
Keywords:
SPS protection level;  Sanitary and Phytosanitary;  soybean;  AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and gray fuzzy evaluation;  International Code Council
分类号:
F744
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
随着农产品进口增多，外来疫病、虫害和危险物进入的概率加大，导致的经济损失大幅提升，考验着中国卫生与植物检疫（Sanitary and Phytosanitary, SPS）“防火墙”的安全性。采用科学方法评估中国农产品SPS措施的保护水平，探寻并强化中国SPS保护的薄弱环节，为构建科学有效的防御系统，保护消费者食品安全和国家生态安全提供理论和实证依据。以中国进口量最大的农产品大豆为例，采用层次分析和灰色模糊评价方法，选取转基因大豆谨慎程度、大豆农药最大残留限量、土壤重金属最大残留限量以及SPS规制数量4个方面87个评价指标，通过主成分分析和降维处理，最终组成23个评价指标，以国际法典委员会标准和国际平均水平为参照体系，评估中国大豆的安全保护水平。研究认为：中国大豆SPS措施处于中等保护水平，与国际水平持平；转基因大豆谨慎程度、农药和重金属残留均处于中等保护，而SPS规制数量则处于较低保护水平，应重点强化；中国SPS保护水平受国情历史、经济水平、科技实力及管理机构的效率等因素影响。
Abstract:
With the increase of imports of agricultural products, the probability of entry of exotic diseases, pests and dangerous substances increased, resulting in a significant increase in economic losses, which tested the safety of China’s Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS). The scientific methods were used to assess the protection level of SPS measures of agricultural products in China, and to explore and strengthen the weak links of SPS protection in China, which provided theoretical and empirical evidence for building a scientific and effective defense system and protecting consumer food safety and national ecological security. Taking soybean which is the most import of agricultural products in China as an example, 87 indexes that include the degree of prudence of genetically modified soybeans, the maximum residue limit of soybean pesticide, the maximum residue limit of soil heavy metals and the regulated quantity of SPS, were selected by adopting the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and gray fuzzy evaluation. In the end, 23 indexes were formed though principal component analysis and dimensionality reduction. The standard of International Code Council (ICC) and the international average level were used as the reference system to assess the security protection level of soybean in China. The results show that the SPS measures of soybean in China are in middle level of protection and at the same level as the international standards. The degree of prudence in genetically modified soybeans, the residues of pesticide and heavy metal are all in middle level of protection, while the regulation quantity of SPS is in the low level of protection, and it needs to be strengthened; Chinese SPS protection level is affected by some factors such as national conditions and history, economic level, scientific and technological strength and efficiency of regulatory agencies and so on.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目（71373154,71673087）；上海市浦江人才基金项目（15PJC048）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-06