|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]宋玉波.孟子思想与儒家伦理的思考[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(03):15-23.
　SONG Yu-bo. Reflection on Mencius’ thoughts and Confucian ethics[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):15-23.
点击复制

孟子思想与儒家伦理的思考(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
15-23
栏目:
长安学
出版日期:
2017-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Reflection on Mencius’ thoughts and Confucian ethics
文章编号:
1671-6248(2017)03-0015-09
作者:
 宋玉波
 西北大学中国思想文化研究所
Author(s):
 SONG Yu-bo
 Institute of Chinese Ideological Culture, Northwest University
关键词:
 ; 人性; 人文; 自然; 优先原则; 道德本能
Keywords:
 ; human nature;  humanity;  nature;  priority principle;  moral instinct
分类号:
B222.5
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对人性问题，告子与孟子进行了多次论辩，对论辩内容所涉及的儒家伦理进行分析论证，来探索孟子学说在具体的生活实践中所具有的原则和策略。研究认为，孟子从仁义内在的立场出发，对告子人性论观念提出批评，其主要凸显的是意向关联性与非观察者姿态的人之存在的本质，这一看法是儒家学说的人文内核；孟子用道德本能将自然与人文有机地统一在一起，否定告子认为的人性无确然的定体观点，王夫之将孟子这一思想进一步阐释为“天命自然之理”，孟子对自然观念的深度改造与汲取，奠定了中华文化中强调态势、关系性的发展基调；孟子用仁义礼智表示人性固有的道德本能，以“嫂溺援之以手”表达恻隐之心优先原则，用道德情感优先能够给予人的良知良能以一以贯之的实现，这与西方哲学中特殊情境下注重优先原则有同样深远的考虑。告子与孟子等历史时期的儒家伦理争鸣表明，儒家学说强调人文化成的意义，在更高的层面上对自然观念加以升华悉收，这是中国文化能够稳定平衡发展的关键所在，当前需要对儒家思想进行更为深刻全面的把握，对孟子以及儒家思想加以契合时代要求的反思与改进。
Abstract:
 Gaozi and Mencius debated a lot of times on human nature. This paper analyzed Confucian ethics involved in the content they debated, aiming to explore the principles and strategies of Mencius’ thoughts in specific life practice. The results show that Mencius’ criticism on Gaozi’s thought of human nature from the perspective of righteousness highlights intention relevance and the nature of existence as a nonobserver, which is the humanity core of Confucianism. Mencius uses moral instinct to unify nature and humanity organically, and negates Gaozi’s idea that human nature is uncertain. This point of view is interpreted by WANG Fuzhi as the natural principle of the mandate of heaven. Mencius’ improvement on the idea of nature set the keynote for Chinese culture on the emphasis of development situation and connectivity. Mencius uses four cardinal virtues to interpret the moral instinct in human nature, including humanity, justice, propriety and wisdom, expresses the priority principle of compassion by use of “lending a helping hand”, and gives priority to moral sentiment to realize the innate goodness and ability instinct of human beings. Such profound consideration is consistent with the principle of priority in special situation in western philosophy. The debate on Confucian ethics between Gaozi and Mencius suggests that Confucianism emphasizes the significance of humanization, sublimates the idea of nature in a higher level, which is the key to ensure that Chinese culture develops stably and evenly. Currently, there is a great need to grasp the core of Confucianism more comprehensively and profoundly, and to reflect on and improve Mencius’ thought and Confucianism, making them satisfy the requirement of the time.

参考文献/References:

［1］本杰明·史华兹.古代中国的思想世界［M］.程钢，译.南京：江苏人民出版社，2004.

［2］王夫之.四书训义［C］//船山全书：第八册.长沙：岳麓书社，1996.

［3］阿尔文·普兰丁格.基督教信念的知识地位［M］.邢滔滔，译.北京：北京大学出版社，2004.

［4］王守仁.王阳明全集［M］.吴光，编.上海：上海古籍出版社，1992.

［5］王夫之.读四书大全说［C］//船山全书：第六册.长沙：岳麓书院，1996.

［6］刘易斯·贝克.《实践理性批判》通释［M］.黄涛，译.上海：华东师范大学出版社，2011.

［7］朱熹.四书或问［C］//朱子全书：第六册.上海：上海古籍出版社，2002.

［8］陈荣捷.中国哲学文献选编［M］.杨儒宾，吴有能，朱荣贵，等，译.黄俊杰，校阅.南京：江苏教育出版社，2006.

［9］王夫之.老子衍［C］//船山全书：第十三册.长沙：岳麓书社，1996.

［10］郭齐勇.儒家伦理争鸣集［M］.武汉：湖北教育出版社，2004.

［11］谢阳举.道家文化对自然和文化相互异化问题的诊治［J］.暨南学报：哲学社会科学版，2012，34（10）：11-18

相似文献/References:

[1]孙董霞.周人之“德”为“明德”论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(02):1.
　SUN Dong xia.Research on “light De” of Zhou — the differences between the Shang’s “De” and Zhou’s “De”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(03):1.
[2]李江辉.刘师培的黄帝明堂研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):12.
　LI Jiang-hui.LIU Shipei’s research on Huang Emperors Mingtang classi[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(03):12.
[3]刘固盛.中国传统文化中的自由精神与现代启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):16.
　LIU Gu-sheng.Spirit of freedom and modern enlightenment in Chinese traditional culture[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(03):16.
[4]刘志.倾听人性真实的声音 ———极端艺术情境中的人性姿态[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2004,6(02):63.
　LIU Zhi.Listening to the true voice of human nature ——— Poses of human nature in the extreme art condition[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2004,6(03):63.
[5]许门友. 文化自信的学理与增强路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):13.
　XU Men-you.Several issues on cultural self-confidence[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):13.
[6]潘小慧.“安”可否作为儒家伦理实践的判准？——从“女安则为之”谈起[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):7.
　Pan Xiaohui.Can “Feeling at ease” be regarded as Confucian ethical practice?——from the perspective of “doing it with feeling at ease”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):7.
[7]周建高. 共享单车爆棚与中国城市空间结构问题[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):20.
　ZHOU Jian-gao.The boom of sharing bicycles and Chinese urban spatial structure[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):20.
[8]王光荣.共享单车发展问题系统探究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):30.
　Wang Guang-rong. Systematic research on Bicycle-sharing development[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):30.
[9]丁诺舟. 日本共享单车的历史、现状与启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):36.
　Ding Nuozhou. History, current situation and enlightenment of Japanese bicycle-sharing[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):36.
[10]杜向民,赵成威. 社会转型期公共部门行政伦理失范及其矫正路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):44.
　DU Xiang-min,ZHAO Cheng-wei. Administrative ethical anomie and rectification approach of public sectors in social transformation period[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):44.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：陕西省教育厅项目（16JZ076）
作者简介：宋玉波（1975-），男，山东沂水人，副教授，硕士研究生导师，历史学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-11