|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张磊,刘桢. 新兴传播模式兴起背景下《中华人民共和国著作权法》相关条款重构研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):104-110.
　ZHANG Lei,LIU Zhen. Study on relevant provisions reconstruction of Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China based on the rise of emerging communication mode[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):104-110.
点击复制

 新兴传播模式兴起背景下《中华人民共和国著作权法》相关条款重构研究(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
104-110
栏目:
法学
出版日期:
2017-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Study on relevant provisions reconstruction of Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China based on the rise of emerging communication mode
文章编号:
1671-6248(2017)02-0104-07
作者:
 张磊; 刘桢
 西安交通大学 法学院，陕西 西安 710049
Author(s):
 ZHANG Lei; LIU Zhen
 School of Law，Xi’an Jiaotong University，Xi’an 710049， Shaanxi, China
关键词:
 ; 新兴传播模式; 信息网络传播权; 向公众传播; 立法路径; 个性化推荐系统
Keywords:
 ; Emerging communication mode;  information network spreading right;  spreading to the public;  legislative path;  personalized recommendation system
分类号:
D923.41
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 三网融合带动了传播技术上的多重变革，推动了新兴传播模式迅速兴起，“交互式”与“非交互式”传播的技术主义立法路径划分已经不能完全涵盖日益涌现的传输手段，介于两者之间的新兴传播模式在信息大爆炸的当下日臻成熟，需要立法层面予以回应，《中华人民共和国著作权法（修订草案送审稿）》（以下称《著作权法》送审稿）仍将“交互式”与“非交互式”作为立法的重要指导，通过分析“交互式”与“非交互式”的特征及其区别，考察介于“交互式”与“非交互式”之间的、以个性化推荐系统为代表的新兴传播模式，参考国外相关的立法例，对中国的立法路径与具体实践进行研究。研究认为，网络与移动等新技术通过采集用户历史数据和分析用户偏好从而推送相应的信息，形成介于“交互式”与“非交互式”之间的新兴传播模式；美国、欧盟及国际上的相关法律条约通过“向公众传播”概念的解释补充，以及技术中立的立法路径对新兴传播模式进行规制；中国的“信息网络传播权”定义仅规范“交互式”传播行为，忽略了对新兴传播模式的规制，应在原有“交互式”与“非交互式”条款保持现状的基础上，增加“其他向公众传播的行为”的规定，进而实现既有法律规定向“向公众传播权”的过渡，为新兴传播模式的可持续性发展提供法理支持。
Abstract:
 The Three Networks Convergence has led to multiple changes in communication technology, which has promoted the rapid rise of the emerging communication mode. The division of the technological legislative path of "interaction" and "non-interaction" communication cannot completely cover the increasingly emerging means of transmission. The new mode of communication between the two is becoming more and more mature at the moment of the big bang of the information, and it is necessary to respond to the legislative level, so the " Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China (Revised Draft)" (hereinafter referred to as the "Copyright Law") will continue to regard "interaction" and "non-interaction" as an important guide to legislation. This paper analyzed the features and the differences between "interaction" and "non-interaction", examined the emerging communication mode which is between "interaction" and "non-interaction" and is represented by the personalized recommendation system, and studied the legislative path and concrete practice of China with reference to the relevant foreign legislation. The results show that new technologies such as network and mobile can form the new communication mode between "interaction" and "non-interaction" by collecting historical data and analyzing preferences of users to push the corresponding information. The United States, the European Union and the international relevant laws and regulations regulate the emerging mode of transmission through interpreting and supplementing the concept of "spreading to the public" as well as the technology-neutral legislative path; the definition of "information network communication rights" in China only standards "interaction" communication behavior, ignoring the regulation of emerging communication mode. It should increase provisions about "other acts of communication to the public" to keep status quo on the basis of the original provision of "interaction" and "non-interaction", and then achieve the transition from the existing legal provisions to the "spreading to the public right", which will provide legal support for the sustainable development of the emerging communication mode.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]孙董霞.周人之“德”为“明德”论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2015,17(02):1.
　SUN Dong xia.Research on “light De” of Zhou — the differences between the Shang’s “De” and Zhou’s “De”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(02):1.
[2]李江辉.刘师培的黄帝明堂研究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):12.
　LI Jiang-hui.LIU Shipei’s research on Huang Emperors Mingtang classi[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(02):12.
[3]刘固盛.中国传统文化中的自由精神与现代启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):16.
　LIU Gu-sheng.Spirit of freedom and modern enlightenment in Chinese traditional culture[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(02):16.
[4]许门友. 文化自信的学理与增强路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):13.
　XU Men-you.Several issues on cultural self-confidence[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):13.
[5]潘小慧.“安”可否作为儒家伦理实践的判准？——从“女安则为之”谈起[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):7.
　Pan Xiaohui.Can “Feeling at ease” be regarded as Confucian ethical practice?——from the perspective of “doing it with feeling at ease”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):7.
[6]周建高. 共享单车爆棚与中国城市空间结构问题[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):20.
　ZHOU Jian-gao.The boom of sharing bicycles and Chinese urban spatial structure[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):20.
[7]王光荣.共享单车发展问题系统探究[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):30.
　Wang Guang-rong. Systematic research on Bicycle-sharing development[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):30.
[8]丁诺舟. 日本共享单车的历史、现状与启示[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):36.
　Ding Nuozhou. History, current situation and enlightenment of Japanese bicycle-sharing[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):36.
[9]杜向民,赵成威. 社会转型期公共部门行政伦理失范及其矫正路径[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):44.
　DU Xiang-min,ZHAO Cheng-wei. Administrative ethical anomie and rectification approach of public sectors in social transformation period[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):44.
[10]王平,孙豪,余文砚. 微信投票乱局与治道变革[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):50.
　WANG Ping,SUN Hao,YU Wen-yan. WeChat voting chaos and governance transform[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):50.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 收稿日期：2017-02-07
基金项目：陕西省软科学项目（2016KRZ01）
作者简介：张磊（1987-），男，山东梁山人，西安交通大学法学博士研究生，新加坡国立大学法学院亚洲法律研究中心访问学者。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-23